processize
Skill12 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a manually-validated workflow into a documented, repeatable, and partially-automatable process. Use AFTER a task has been done at least 3 times by hand and is showing signs of repetition. Inspired by Sahil Lavingia's principle "do it manually until it works, then processize." Activated when the user says "tô fazendo isso toda semana", "vamos automatizar?", "isso já cansou", or after `daily-standup` flags repeated manual work.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- scaccogatto/minimalist-entrepreneurtheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- suvimatt/agent-bootstrappertheir own version, first seen Aug 31, 2026
- kalias/OPC_starter_skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 20, 2026
- CarbeneAI/Forgetheir own version, first seen Apr 22, 2026
- keeea/minimalist-entrepreneur-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 16, 2026
- consubstantial-polistes407/skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 23, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- slavingia/skills★ 11ksame name
- keeea/minimalist-entrepreneur-skills★ 19same name
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 9same name
- kalias/OPC_starter_skills★ 1same name
- scaccogatto/minimalist-entrepreneur★ 1same name
- suvimatt/agent-bootstrapper★ 1same name
- consubstantial-polistes407/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- business-plan-impact-reviewSkill
- codemapSkill
- cost-watchdogSkill
- daily-standupSkill
- decision-logSkill
- deploy-vercel-supabaseSkill
- feature-scaffoldSkill
- first-100-usersSkill
- grow-sustainablySkill
- multi-ai-reviewSkill
- os-self-testSkill
- pitchSkill
- plain-portuguese-explainerSkill
- privacy-auditSkill
- product-briefSkill
- project-genesisSkill
- prototype-labSkill
- registry-pickSkill
- release-checkSkill
- research-wavesSkill
- rollback-safeSkill
- secrets-disciplineSkill
- secrets-scanSkill
- sprint-managementSkill
- sprint-roadmapSkill
- usage-monitorSkill
- verify-build-worksSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
Before introducing any cron, scheduled job, webhook, or AI loop that codifies a workflow.
- Distinctive: line 46
Before producing a process document, the skill MUST get answers to these.
- Distinctive: line 54
If question 5 has a P0 answer (sends emails to customers, charges cards, deletes data), the process MUST include a circuit breaker, a …
- Distinctive: line 133
NOT automatable yet: the DM body.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Processize
Codify a process AFTER you have validated it manually. Never automate a workflow that is still being discovered. Automation locks in whatever you point it at — including the bugs.
Mindset
"If you automate before validating, you scale the wrong thing. If you process-ize after validating 3+ times, you've earned the right to compress." — paraphrased from Sahil Lavingia, The Minimalist Entrepreneur
Three-stage maturity:
- Manual — first 1–3 times. Pure improvisation. Goal: learn what the process actually is.
- Documented — 3rd to ~10th time. Same human, written checklist, no automation. Goal: prove the steps are stable.
- Processized — 10th+ time. Checklist + AI assist + selective automation. Goal: compress the predictable parts, leave judgment with the human.
Skipping straight from 1 to 3 is the most expensive bug in vibe coding.
When to invoke
- User says "tô fazendo isso toda semana" / "isso já cansou" / "deve ter um jeito mais rápido".
- User says "vamos automatizar isso?" — invoke FIRST to check it has been validated 3+ times.
daily-standupskill flags the same manual task across 3+ sessions.- Post-launch operations work that is repeating: weekly user outreach, content publishing, retention checks, billing reconciliation.
- Before introducing any cron, scheduled job, webhook, or AI loop that codifies a workflow.
When NOT to invoke
- The task has been done fewer than 3 times.
- The task changes shape every time it runs (still in discovery).
- The user wants to redesign the process, not codify it — use brainstorming or
prototype-labinstead. - The task is a one-off (e.g. "set up the Stripe account") — write a session log, not a process.
The 5-question gate
Before producing a process document, the skill MUST get answers to these. Ask them one at a time if missing:
- How many times has this been done manually? (< 3 → stop, do it manually a few more times.)
- Did it produce the desired outcome the last 3 times? (no → not yet ready; debug the manual version first.)
- Which steps are identical every time? (these are the automation candidates.)
- Which steps require human judgment? (these stay manual or become AI-assisted.)
- What would happen if the automated version ran wrong for a week without anyone noticing? (defines the safety net.)
If question 5 has a P0 answer (sends emails to customers, charges cards, deletes data), the process MUST include a circuit breaker, a sample size limit, and a notification.
Output format
Generate docs/processes/<slug>.md with this structure:
# Process — <name>
**Status:** documented · partially-automated · fully-automated
**Owner:** <human name>
**Last validated manually:** <YYYY-MM-DD>
**Run frequency:** <weekly / per-customer / on-event>
**Failure blast radius:** <none / cosmetic / financial / customer-trust / P0>
## Trigger
What event or condition starts this process.
## Steps
| # | Step | Mode | Notes |
|---|------|------|-------|
| 1 | ... | manual / AI-assisted / automated | ... |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... |
## Inputs
What you need before starting.
## Outputs
What this process produces. Where it lives.
## Quality gates
What "done correctly" looks like. How to verify.
## Failure modes
The 2–3 most likely ways this breaks. Detection + recovery for each.
## Automation boundary
Which steps are safe to automate today. Which require more validation runs first. Why.
## Circuit breakers (if any step is automated)
- Daily/weekly cap on runs.
- Required notification on every Nth run or on any error.
- Manual approval gate for actions with non-trivial blast radius.
## Change log
| Date | Change | Why |
|------|--------|-----|Hand-off rules
- The skill never builds the automation itself. It produces the document. Implementation is a sprint task.
- The first automated version of any process MUST run alongside the manual version for at least 2 cycles before the manual version is retired.
- Any step with
Failure blast radius: financialor higher requires/multi-ai-reviewbefore automation. - Processes that touch personal data trigger
privacy-audit.
Examples
Example 1 — first-100-users outreach
- Manual runs: 12 times (week-over-week).
- Stable steps: pull list, write personalized DM, log response, update CRM.
- Judgment steps: choosing tone, deciding when to follow up.
- Automatable today: list pull, CRM logging.
- NOT automatable yet: the DM body. Save for v2 once tone is calibrated.
Example 2 — billing reconciliation
- Manual runs: 4 times.
- Stable steps: download Stripe CSV, match against Supabase user table, flag orphans.
- Failure blast radius:
financial— circuit breaker required if automated. - Recommended: AI-assist for the matching step, human signoff for the flag-and-resolve step.
Cross-references
- Principle:
ETHOS.mditem 13. - Pre-condition:
daily-standupflagged repetition. - Often paired with:
cost-watchdog(automation can quietly increase API spend),privacy-audit(if personal data is involved),/multi-ai-review(financial blast radius). - Inspired by:
docs/registry/packs/slavingia-skills.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

