poteto-help
Skill1 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Guides users through pstack setup, $poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type $poteto-help with a question.
14 other projects use a version of this, 13 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- paramcodes/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- creedants/pstack-t3edited, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- adjohn/pstackedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyoneedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- dsebban/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- DarthJonathan/guac-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ketchup-video, maintain-formal-verification-skill and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 7 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillmaintain-formal-verification-skill
Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for /maintain-formal-verification-skill, \"is the model still true to the code\", or after merges and refactors that touched verified code without rechecking it.
Also in 9 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillstatechart
Draw what an app's user sees as a Mermaid statechart from a TLA+ model. States are gray if they work, red if still wrong, and green if fixed. Each bug TLC finds is a numbered path. Use for /statechart, \"show the PM the bug\", or to turn an agreed chart into a TLA+ skeleton.
Also in 8 projects that use this
Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 13
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8k75% same
- dsebban/skills★ 7146% same
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 2175% same
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 1860% same
- mariusflorescu/pstack-t3★ 1368% same
- adjohn/pstack★ 975% same
- lucasheriques/pstack★ 355% same
- iancleary/skills★ 184% same
- PickleBoxer/pstack★ 187% same
- anhermon/pstack-claude★ 077% same
3 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 1
- DarthJonathan/guac-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- automate-meSkill
- benchmark-checklistSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- broSkill
- correctSkill
- create-formal-verification-skillSkill
- create-verification-skillSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- howSkill
- interrogateSkill
- in-your-own-wordsSkill
- ketchupSkill
- maintain-verification-skillSkill
- make-bot-uiSkill
- no-commentsSkill
- poteto-modeSkill
- principle-attack-the-premiseSkill
- principle-boundary-disciplineSkill
- principle-build-the-leverSkill
- principle-encode-lessons-in-structureSkill
- principle-exhaust-the-design-spaceSkill
- principle-experience-firstSkill
- principle-explain-the-numberSkill
- principle-fix-root-causesSkill
- principle-foundational-thinkingSkill
- principle-guard-the-context-windowSkill
- principle-laziness-protocolSkill
- principle-make-operations-idempotentSkill
- principle-migrate-callers-then-delete-legacy-apisSkill
- principle-minimize-reader-loadSkill
- principle-model-the-domainSkill
- principle-never-block-on-the-humanSkill
- principle-outcome-oriented-executionSkill
- principle-prove-it-worksSkill
- principle-redesign-from-first-principlesSkill
- principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-stateSkill
- principle-sequence-verifiable-unitsSkill
- principle-subtract-before-you-addSkill
- principle-test-behavior-not-implementationSkill
- principle-type-system-disciplineSkill
- pstack-tddSkill
- pstack-teachSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- setup-pstackSkill
- sharpenSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- swarmSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- typescript-best-practicesSkill
- unslopSkill
- whySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 1 is common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Start a task with $poteto-mode
- Common: line 24
Check the state that changes the answer, and mention it only when it does:
- Very specific: line 37
Run $setup-pstack. It asks for a reasoning budget, maps a model to each role, and writes a rule.
- Very specific: line 38
Start a real task with $poteto-mode, a goal, and a check that can pass or fail.
- Very specific: line 95
If a skill directory next to this one is missing from the table, read its frontmatter and route by its description.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Poteto help
Answer the user's question about pstack, hand them a prompt they can send, and link the file the answer came from. For a help question, don't start the work. The user asked how, and a pstack run spends real tokens, so let them send the prompt.
A message that asks for work, such as "use pstack to fix this bug", is not a help question. Read poteto-mode, do the work under it, and mention once that a Custom Mode keeps it on.
This file maps questions to the skills and guide pages that hold the answers. Those files own the details. Read the file you route to before you quote it, and trust it when it disagrees with this map. The links here point into the installed plugin, which the user may not be able to open, so give the user the file's public copy: https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/main/pstack/ followed by its path.
Find out what they need
Infer the need from the message and the conversation. A named situation, such as "which skill reviews a PR?", goes straight to its section. If the need is still unclear, ask one multiple-choice question with these options, then answer only the section they pick:
- Get set up
- Start a task with
$poteto-mode - Pick a skill for a situation
- Fix a run that went wrong
- Make pstack my own
Check the state that changes the answer, and mention it only when it does:
- No
~/.codex/pstack-models.mdmeans$setup-pstackhasn't run for this user, so every role uses its default model. - No
verify-*skill or other app harness in the project means agents have no scripted way to drive the app. Mention$create-verification-skillwhen the question is about proving a change works.
When the model rule is missing and it matters, ask whether the user wants to pick a model for each role and a reasoning budget now. It matters when the user is new, the question is about setup or cost, or the answer depends on which models run. Ask at most once per chat. If the need is also unclear, ask both questions together. Offer two choices:
- Now: give them
$setup-pstackto type, and answer their question too. - Later: answer their question, and add one line saying every role keeps its default model until they run
$setup-pstack.
Get set up
- The skills are already installed under
$CODEX_HOME/skills/pstack. Invoke one by name or let Codex match it from the description. - Run
$setup-pstack. It asks for a reasoning budget, maps a model to each role, and writes a rule. The rule applies to new chats. - Start a real task with
$poteto-mode, a goal, and a check that can pass or fail.
Installing changes nothing until the user invokes a skill. Only $setup-pstack loads from the user's words. The README and guide page 1) have the details. Offer to word their first prompt with them, per references/prompting.md.
If cost is the worry, say where the tokens go and how to spend fewer. pstack spends extra tokens on subagents and review panels. Rerun $setup-pstack and pick a smaller budget or cheaper models. A role set to auto or inherit-parent runs on the chat's model, which saves tokens when the chat runs on Auto or a cheaper model. A shorter panel list runs fewer subagents, one for each entry. Save $poteto-mode for work that needs rigor.
pstack was written for Cursor and runs here on Codex. The skills are portable, but the subagent plumbing is adapted: role models come from ~/.codex/pstack-models.md, there are no Custom Modes, and repeating audits run on the scheduler or a watcher subagent.
Start a task with $poteto-mode
$poteto-mode matches the task to a playbook, copies the playbook's steps into the todo list, and runs the other skills as the steps need them. A step it skips stays in the list as skip: <reason>. A good prompt states the goal and how to tell it's done. It doesn't list skills, because a hand-written sequence tends to drop or reorder steps the playbook would keep. Read references/prompting.md before you help word one. Guide page 2) has examples.
Whether $poteto-mode stays on depends on how the user starts it:
- Typing
$poteto-modeattaches the skill to one message. It fades as the chat moves on. - Codex has no Custom Modes. Start each new task with
$poteto-mode.
Link Codex's skills docs when this comes up. Mid-chat, "new task" makes the mode match a fresh playbook. $poteto-mode already uses poteto-agent for the subagents its playbook steps spawn. To get the same style from a subagent of your own, pass $CODEX_HOME/skills/pstack/agents/poteto-agent.md as its prompt.
Pick a skill
The default answer is $poteto-mode, which runs most of the others when its steps need them. Name a skill directly when the user wants more or less of something than the playbook gives. Read the skill before you recommend it, and give one example prompt.
| The user wants to | Skill |
| Do any non-trivial task with rigor | $poteto-mode |
| Check that the agent understood their goal and the problem before it starts | $in-your-own-words |
| Aim a task higher before starting: more expert, more outcome-focused, not overspecified | $sharpen |
| Know how code works now, or where new code should live | $how |
| Know why code is shaped this way, or where a number came from | $why |
| Understand a change or subsystem, explained plainly | $pstack-teach |
| Catch up on their own recent work on a topic | $recall |
| Catch up on what changed in this chat since their last message, in a few plain sentences and small visuals, with enough context to decide each action item | $ketchup |
| Know what a small diff could break outside itself | $blast-radius |
| Settle types and module shape before code that crosses a function boundary | $architect |
| Get several attempts at one brief, merged into the best one | $arena |
| Run parallel checks over slices, or race workers, in parallel subagents | $swarm |
| Have different models review a diff and try to break it | $interrogate |
| Fix a bug test-first when a cheap local test exists | $pstack-tdd |
Apply TypeScript rules to .ts or .tsx work | $typescript-best-practices |
| Strip comments before review, using a reviewer that didn't write them | $no-comments |
| Clean AI tells out of prose | $unslop |
| Write docs, an RFC, a README, a PR description, or a commit message to a standard | $technical-writing |
| Hear the last reply again in plain words | $bro |
| Give agents a scripted way to drive the app and prove behavior | $create-verification-skill |
| Bring a verification skill and its feature map back in line with the app | $maintain-verification-skill |
| Prove a property that tests cannot reach, such as a race, retry, parser, or state machine | $create-formal-verification-skill |
| Vet a performance number before reporting or acting on it | $benchmark-checklist |
| Run a large or cross-cutting change, or one to review after stepping away | $figure-it-out |
| Keep a decision log during a run, and review it afterward | $show-me-your-work |
| Pick a model for each role and a reasoning budget | $setup-pstack |
| Turn their own working habits into a personal mode skill | $automate-me |
| Turn what a finished task taught into skill edits | $reflect |
| Stop agents from repeating the same mistakes in this repo | $correct |
| Build a page whose buttons wake a Grok Bot over a webhook | $make-bot-ui) |
| Find their way around pstack | $poteto-help |
If a skill directory next to this one is missing from the table, read its frontmatter and route by its description. The principle-* directories are covered under principles below.
Close calls:
$howexplains what the code does.$whyexplains the reasons.$pstack-teachruns one or both and explains the result plainly.$arenagives every worker the same brief and merges the best parts.$swarmsplits work into slices or a race and returns one report.$architectimplements right after it settles the design. Add "with checkpoint" to review the design before it writes code.$interrogatereviews the diff.$blast-radiuslooks for breakage outside the diff and proves the one fact that makes the change safe.$recallrebuilds context across recent chats.$ketchupcovers only this chat since the user's last message. Resuming one specific chat or branch is the Session pickup playbook.$figure-it-outdesigns one rigorous run. The Orchestrate playbook runs a program that spans days and many PRs. The Autonomous run playbook drives one task to a finish condition.
Not in pstack:
deslop,control-cli, andcontrol-uiship in Cursor'scursor-team-kitplugin and are not installed here. Drive CLIs and TUIs through shell execution, and browser or desktop UIs through the browser and computer tools.skill-creatoris a Codex skill. A repeating audit runs on the scheduler.- pstack has no orchestrate skill. Orchestrate is a
$poteto-modeplaybook.
Playbooks and principles
Playbooks are step lists inside $poteto-mode, not skills, so they have no slash command. Inside $poteto-mode, describing the task picks one, and these phrases name one directly:
- "babysit this pr" or "check on pr 123" runs Babysit. It drives the PR to merge-ready and stops there. It doesn't merge unless the user asks to merge, land, or ship.
- "land the stack" runs Shipping.
- "take over this branch" runs Session pickup.
- "pause safely" runs Pause safely.
- "full autopilot on this queue" runs Autopilot-full. "stack them, don't ship" runs Autopilot-stack.
- "run the eval playbook" runs Eval.
Without $poteto-mode, a phrase such as "babysit this pr" may route to another skill for the same job. The Playbooks section of poteto-mode lists every playbook and when it applies. Guide page 6) covers opening, babysitting, and landing a PR.
pstack has no planning skill. Codex has no plan mode to pair with. For work that spans phases or stacked PRs, asking $poteto-mode for a plan runs the Multi-phase plan playbook, which writes the plan and doesn't implement it. For a design question, the Prototype playbook or $architect settles it in code first.
Principles are one-rule skills that $poteto-mode reads and cites in its replies. The user rarely invokes one. They steer with the names instead, as in "apply prove it works. show me the real output." Typing /principle-<name> still loads one on demand. Guide page 8) lists them.
Fix a run that went wrong
| Symptom | Fix |
| The mode stopped applying after a few turns | The skill attached to one message. Start each task with $poteto-mode. |
| A question got treated as the next step of the last task | Say "new task", or say the turn doesn't need the mode. |
| A new model choice had no effect | The rule from $setup-pstack applies to new chats. Start one. |
| Runs cost more than expected | See the cost paragraph under Get set up. |
| A skill didn't load on its own | Only $setup-pstack loads from the user's words. The others load when the user types them or when $poteto-mode runs them, and it doesn't run every skill. |
| Parallel agents overwrote each other | Give each agent its own worktree or branch. |
| An overnight run moved but finished nothing | A repeating audit needs a check that can pass or fail, not a duration. See guide page 7). |
| The reply claims success from a green build | Ask for the real command, flow, stored value, or profile. That's the prove-it-works principle. |
For a run that drifts, references/prompting.md has one-line steers. Guide page 10) has more pitfalls and the recipes worth copying.
Make pstack my own
$automate-medrafts a personal mode skill from the user's own history, to use alongside$poteto-mode.$reflectafter a session turns its lessons into skill edits the user approves.$poteto-mode write a skill for <workflow>runs the authoring playbook. The eval playbook tests a skill change blind.- Fix a misbehaving skill in its own PR, not inside the feature work where it went wrong.
Guide page 9) covers each of these.
Reply
Lead with the answer. Give at most one example prompt in a code block, adapted from references/recipes.md when one fits, then the link to that file. Keep it short unless the user asked for the whole map.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

