agentleFS
Sign inStart free
lee-agilee-agi/agent-os-asset/skills/kb-review/SKILL.md

kb-review

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Review historical personal knowledge assets for AI-era value, including legacy `kb-refactor` requests, and decide whether to keep, delete, archive, retain metadata, generate an Agent Asset, or deduplicate them. / 审查历史个人知识资产在 AI 时代的价值（包括旧版 `kb-refactor` 请求），并决定保留、删除、归档、仅保留元数据、生成 Agent Asset 或去重。

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use docs-loop, full-loop and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • GeiserXSkill

    docs-loop

    Use when the user asks to audit docs, check documentation for stale claims, or verify docs against the code.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GeiserXSkill

    full-loop

    Drive a repository to done with sergio-loop, then keep improving it with refine-loop at a descending theta. Use only when the user explicitly invokes full-loop.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • joris887Skill

    refine-loop

    Use when the user wants iterative self-improvement on a deliverable (document, implementation, prompt, design) until completion criteria are met.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • RandyRawgustSkill

    revive

    Scan every project in 02 - Projects/ (and follow path: frontmatter to on-disk location), check git activity, surface dormant projects with one-page resurrection plans. Use when Andy says revive, resurrect, dormant projects, what projects could I pick back up, find stalled work.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • assisjpSkill

    file-pr

    Prepare and open or update an authorized pull request with a concise problem-first description and verifiable evidence. Use when the user asks to create, file, open, or update a PR. Do not use merely to review a diff or when publication is not authorized.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +7 more from GeiserX
  • Other versions6 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 6

    1. timurgaleev/vibestack★ 8same name
    2. GeiserX/agent-skills★ 5same name
    3. GeiserX/claude-skills★ 5same name
    4. GeiserX/sstack★ 5same name
    5. Iabstergo1/pdf-to-study-kb★ 2same name
    6. Movida/okf-hub★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free