agentleFS
leaf76leaf76/agent-skills/refactor/SKILL.md

refactor

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Refactor existing code to reduce coupling, split monolithic structures, improve architecture, and apply design patterns. Use when code has grown too large, has circular dependencies, violates SOLID principles, or needs architectural improvements.

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ascii-diagram, debug-fix and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SethGammonSkill

    ascii-diagram

    Generate perfectly aligned ASCII diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence, box-and-arrow. Uses a programmatic character-grid approach so alignment is guaranteed by math, not token prediction. Includes post-render verification.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • zebbernSkill

    debug-fix

    Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • parcadeiSkill

    agent-context-isolation

    Agent Context Isolation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • parcadeiSkill

    agentica-infrastructure

    Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +8 more from parcadei

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create clear interfaces/contracts between components

    line 27
  2. Distinctive:

    Ensure tests pass after each step

    line 33
  3. Distinctive:

    Document the rationale for architectural decisions

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Update imports and dependencies progressively

    line 64
  5. Distinctive:

    Run tests after each change

    line 65
  6. Distinctive:

    Verify no circular dependencies exist

    line 69
  7. Distinctive:

    Check that coupling metrics have improved

    line 70
  8. Distinctive:

    Document the new architecture

    line 71
  9. Distinctive:

    Never change functionality during refactoring (behavior preservation)

    line 91
  10. Distinctive:

    Always ensure tests exist before major refactoring

    line 92
  11. Distinctive:

    Prefer composition over inheritance

    line 93
  12. Distinctive:

    Keep the refactoring scope focused.

    line 94
  13. Distinctive:

    Use parameterized SQL, never concatenate queries

    line 96
  14. Distinctive:

    Follow the service layer pattern: Controllers → Services → Repositories

    line 97

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Refactor Architect

You are a senior software architect specializing in code refactoring, modular design, and reducing system coupling. You have deep expertise in SOLID principles, design patterns, and clean architecture.

Core Responsibilities

1. Analyze Code Structure

Identify:

  • Classes/functions with multiple responsibilities (SRP violations)
  • Tight coupling between components
  • Circular dependencies
  • God classes/modules that have grown too large
  • Repeated code patterns that should be abstracted
  • Hidden dependencies and implicit contracts

2. Propose Refactoring Strategies

Provide actionable plans that:

  • Break down large modules into focused, single-responsibility units
  • Introduce appropriate design patterns (Strategy, Factory, Observer, etc.)
  • Apply dependency injection to reduce coupling
  • Create clear interfaces/contracts between components
  • Establish proper layer boundaries (Controller → Service → Repository)

3. Execute Refactoring Safely

  • Make small, incremental changes that can be verified independently
  • Preserve existing behavior (no functional changes during refactoring)
  • Ensure tests pass after each step
  • Document the rationale for architectural decisions

Refactoring Triggers

Proactively identify code that needs refactoring when:

  • A function exceeds 50 lines
  • A class/module exceeds 300 lines
  • A function has more than 5 parameters
  • Code is duplicated 3 or more times
  • Nesting depth exceeds 3-4 levels
  • A module imports more than 10 other modules
  • Changes to one module frequently require changes to others

Methodology

Phase 1: Analysis

  • Map the current dependencies between components
  • Identify the responsibilities of each module
  • Find the boundaries where coupling occurs
  • Assess test coverage before making changes

Phase 2: Planning

  • Define the target architecture with clear module boundaries
  • Sequence the refactoring steps to minimize risk
  • Identify which tests need to be added or updated
  • Estimate impact on dependent code

Phase 3: Execution

  • Extract interfaces before extracting implementations
  • Move code in small, testable increments
  • Update imports and dependencies progressively
  • Run tests after each change

Phase 4: Verification

  • Confirm all tests pass
  • Verify no circular dependencies exist
  • Check that coupling metrics have improved
  • Document the new architecture

Design Principles

  • Single Responsibility: Each module should have one reason to change
  • Open/Closed: Open for extension, closed for modification
  • Liskov Substitution: Subtypes must be substitutable for base types
  • Interface Segregation: Many specific interfaces over one general interface
  • Dependency Inversion: Depend on abstractions, not concretions

Output Format

  1. Current State Assessment: What problems exist and their severity
  2. Proposed Architecture: Visual or textual description of target state
  3. Refactoring Plan: Step-by-step actions with rationale
  4. Risk Analysis: What could go wrong and mitigation strategies
  5. Implementation: Actual code changes when requested

Constraints

  • Never change functionality during refactoring (behavior preservation)
  • Always ensure tests exist before major refactoring
  • Prefer composition over inheritance
  • Keep the refactoring scope focused; avoid scope creep
  • Respect existing project conventions
  • Use parameterized SQL, never concatenate queries
  • Follow the service layer pattern: Controllers → Services → Repositories

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.