shape-up
Skill11 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Structure and stress-test a semi-cooked idea into a design-ready brief with a fixed appetite, fenced scope boundaries, and named rabbit holes. No prerequisites — works at any point in the pipeline. Use when the user says "shape this up", "turn these notes into a brief", "I have a rough pitch", "scope this down", "what should I cut", or invokes /shape-up. Emits shaped-brief.md with the shaping gate. Do NOT use to stress-test whether a concept should exist at all (/validate-idea), to research market or competitors (/explore-idea), to frame a problem you have not stated yet (/unpack-problem), or to turn research into specs (/design).
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- huntsyea/product-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 3, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- huntsyea/product-skills★ 8same name
- marcos-sponton/frameworks-as-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyze-dataSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- craft-lessonSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-skillSkill
- customize-agentSkill
- customize-skillSkill
- designSkill
- deslopSkill
- developSkill
- discovery-reportSkill
- elicitationSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- explore-ideaSkill
- grill-meSkill
- help-meSkill
- humanizeSkill
- incidentSkill
- iterateSkill
- journey-mapSkill
- jtbdSkill
- kanbanSkill
- launchSkill
- legal-safety-auditSkill
- maintenance-executeSkill
- maintenance-planSkill
- memorySkill
- motionSkill
- phaseSkill
- planSkill
- research-planSkill
- retroSkill
- reviewSkill
- root-causeSkill
- round-tableSkill
- shut-upSkill
- statusSkill
- teach-meSkill
- testSkill
- unpack-problemSkill
- validate-ideaSkill
- validation-patternsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
No explicit modes. The skill checks what artifacts exist and adapts:
- Very specific: line 47
Every assumption is marked verified / plausible / unverified, and every verified one carries the evidence it was verified against
- Distinctive: line 49
Every gap found in Step 3 is either closed with evidence or carried forward as a named open question with a disposition
- Very specific: line 50
Every decision written to active-decisions.md passes memory_check.js (written via memory_write.js, not hand-edited)
- Distinctive: line 55
Follow the step sequence exactly.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Shape Up
<!-- router-skill -->Takes a semi-cooked idea — a plan, pitch, doc, or set of notes — and shapes it into a structured, loophole-tested, design-ready brief. No prerequisites. Works whether the user skipped early phases entirely or completed them and needs a shaping checkpoint before design.
Supported flows
validate-idea → explore-idea → **shape-up** → design— post-research synthesis**shape-up** → design— standalone shaping (skip validation + research)**shape-up** → explore-idea → design— pre-research structuringunpack-problem → **shape-up** → design— problem-first: explore problem → shape solution → design- Double-run:
shape-up → explore → shape-up → design— shape, research, re-shape
Context detection
No explicit modes. The skill checks what artifacts exist and adapts:
- Nothing exists → full shaping from user input
- Validation brief exists (
01-discovery/validation-brief.md) → incorporates premises, skips re-framing - Problem brief exists (
02-research/problem-space-brief.md) → uses problem definition as intake, shapes the selected solution concept - Research artifacts exist (
02-research/*.md) → synthesizes findings into the brief - Shaped brief already exists (
01-discovery/shaped-brief.md) → re-shape mode (post-research re-run)
When to invoke
- The user has a semi-cooked idea — a plan, pitch, doc, or scattered notes — and wants it shaped into a brief that
/designcan consume /explore-ideahas returned findings that need consolidating before specs- The user says "shape this up", "turn these notes into a brief", "I have a rough pitch", or invokes
/shape-up - The user wants to re-shape an existing
shaped-brief.mdagainst new research evidence
When NOT to invoke
- There is a validated concept and market evidence already exists — go to
/explore-ideaor/designdirectly - The input is a problem rather than a proposed solution — use
/unpack-problem; shaping a solution before the problem is framed launders the assumption
Halt conditions
- Stress-test reveals the idea is fundamentally unviable -> recommend
validate-ideainstead - Gap analysis surfaces 5+ blocker-severity gaps with no path to resolution
- User abandons shaping mid-flow (decisions logged, partial brief saved)
Done when
artifacts/output/01-discovery/shaped-brief.mdexists with the shaping gate recorded in the document — plain sentence first, then the bracketed card (VERDICT: [GO] — When: <NOW|GATED|NEXT-CYCLE>/VERDICT: [RESHAPE]/VERDICT: [NO-GO]; format in.agents/references/vespyr-dna.md§Decision Gate). The chat reply carries only the plain wording.- The brief states Appetite (a timebox budget, not an estimate), Scope In / Scope Out, and Rabbit Holes explicitly fenced — a brief with non-goals but no fenced rabbit holes will get them re-litigated mid-build
- Every assumption is marked verified / plausible / unverified, and every
verifiedone carries the evidence it was verified against - The shaping gate is honest about the distinction: this skill gates shaping readiness, not concept viability.
[GO]on shaping readiness is unavailable while any assumption is unverified — that is[RESHAPE](needs evidence). Concept viability belongs to/validate-idea. - Every gap found in Step 3 is either closed with evidence or carried forward as a named open question with a disposition
- Every decision written to
active-decisions.mdpassesmemory_check.js(written viamemory_write.js, not hand-edited) - The handoff step names the next skill and the artifact it consumes
@memory-controller session-writehas run
Harness adherence (non-negotiable)
- Follow the step sequence exactly. Do NOT skip steps or reorder them.
- Each step file is a contract. Read it fully before executing.
- Context detection is automatic — adapt step depth based on existing artifacts. Do NOT ask the user which mode to use.
Prerequisites
None. This is a flexible entry point.
Step sequence
- Context Scan →
steps/step-01-context-scan.md - Intake & Structure →
steps/step-02-intake-structure.md - Gap Analysis →
steps/step-03-gap-analysis.md - Stress-Test →
steps/step-04-stress-test.md - Decision Alignment →
steps/step-05-decision-alignment.md - Handoff →
steps/step-06-handoff.md
Output artifacts
The document surface — the machine record lives here, and the gates read these files.
artifacts/output/01-discovery/shaped-brief.mdartifacts/memory/active-decisions.md(appended)
The chat reply is the human surface: plain wording and a link, never a token or card field
(.agents/references/vespyr-dna.md §Two surfaces).
State & memory integration
At start, run: node .agents/scripts/orchestrator_state.js status
At start: Load context before context scan (step-01):
@memory-controller load founder [shape-up — {idea or feature name}]At end: node .agents/scripts/orchestrator_state.js complete --agent founder --artifact 01-discovery/shaped-brief.md
Memory: Final step closes with @memory-controller session-write — mandatory per GUARDRAILS §Session Continuity.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

