develop
Skill11 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Core MVP workflow — spec review, architecture, planning, implementation, coverage fidelity review, QA, verification, and documentation. Use when the user says "build this", "implement the approved plan", "start development", "run the dev cycle", or invokes /develop after planning is complete.
28 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- killerseven7777777/matt-skills-relaytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chippingway/chipping-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- Blakeem/aipromptguide-workflowstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- javiarmesto/ALDC-AL-Development-Collectiontheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- ok-oldking/ok-scripttheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- raine/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use scope, sync and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
YuriNachosSkillscope
Configure claude-scope status line widgets for Claude Code. Use when user wants to customize widgets, change theme, reorder elements, or modify display style.
Also in 6 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillsync
Sync the current session branch with its upstream branch, or publish the current session branch to a remote. Use when the user asks to sync a branch, pull latest changes, rebase onto upstream, push current branch, publish branch, or set upstream.
Also in 6 projects that use this
nicolasestremSkilldocument
Create focused documentation for specific components or features
Also in 5 projects that use this
kt057Skillcheck
lint, typecheck, test を一括実行して結果をサマリーする
Also in 5 projects that use this
Harut8Skillarchitect
Also in 9 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilldebug
Structured debugging session — reproduce, isolate, diagnose, and fix. Trigger with an error message or stack trace, "this works in staging but not prod", "something broke after the deploy", or when behavior diverges from expected and the cause isn't obvious.
Also in 9 projects that use this
Other versions28 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 28
- jsmastery-pro/skills★ 1.4ksame name
- perber/leafwiki★ 1.2ksame name
- ok-oldking/ok-script★ 831same name
- quantumaikr/quant.cpp★ 403same name
- javiarmesto/ALDC-AL-Development-Collection★ 115same name
- chippingway/chipping-orchestrator★ 18same name
- alexiolan/craft-skills★ 17same name
- axiomantic/spellbook★ 11same name
- flurdy/agent-skills★ 9same name
- martinappberg/chimaera★ 7same name
18 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyze-dataSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- craft-lessonSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-skillSkill
- customize-agentSkill
- customize-skillSkill
- designSkill
- deslopSkill
- discovery-reportSkill
- elicitationSkill
- empathy-mapSkill
- explore-ideaSkill
- grill-meSkill
- help-meSkill
- humanizeSkill
- incidentSkill
- iterateSkill
- journey-mapSkill
- jtbdSkill
- kanbanSkill
- launchSkill
- legal-safety-auditSkill
- maintenance-executeSkill
- maintenance-planSkill
- memorySkill
- motionSkill
- phaseSkill
- planSkill
- research-planSkill
- retroSkill
- reviewSkill
- root-causeSkill
- round-tableSkill
- shape-upSkill
- shut-upSkill
- statusSkill
- teach-meSkill
- testSkill
- unpack-problemSkill
- validate-ideaSkill
- validation-patternsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
If a prototype is in scope, the @product-designer + @tech-lead prototype-collaboration.md record exists and prototype_collab_gate.js verify …
- Distinctive: line 26
Always "create" on first activation.
- Very specific: line 30
Read stepsCompleted array from artifacts/output/05-execution/develop-state.md (or start at []).
- Distinctive: line 36
Follow the step sequence exactly.
- Very specific: line 40
If a step halts (test failure, security finding, 2+ review cycles), stop and escalate to @tech-lead.
- Distinctive: line 59
Test failure that doesn't reproduce locally
- Distinctive: line 74
After step-06 (dev loop complete): Write key implementation decisions:
- Distinctive: line 82
At completion (step-10): Write session summary — mandatory:
- Very specific: line 108
All steps in stepsCompleted
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Develop — Multi-Step Workflow
<!-- router-skill -->This skill runs in sequential steps. Each step is a self-contained file with its own halt conditions. Load one at a time.
When to invoke
- Phase ≥ 4 (planning complete)
@tech-leadhas approvedartifacts/output/05-planning/execution-plan.md- Worktrees allocated (multi-developer mode, via step 3b) OR single-developer mode
- Implementation is executed by
@developerfrom the approved plan (via worktrees in multi-developer mode)
Prerequisites
- Spec-kernel exists at
artifacts/output/03-strategy/(see spec-kernel-template.md) - User stories in
artifacts/output/03-strategy/user-stories.md - If a prototype is in scope, the
@product-designer+@tech-leadprototype-collaboration.mdrecord exists andprototype_collab_gate.js verify --scope handoffpasses for the recorded track and prototype. Do not infer a missing collaboration record from a showcase HTML file.
Mode detection
- Always "create" on first activation.
- Resume is automatic: read
stepsCompletedfrom the output document's YAML frontmatter and jump to the first uncompleted step.
Step loader
- Read
stepsCompletedarray fromartifacts/output/05-execution/develop-state.md(or start at []). - Compute next step = first step NOT in
stepsCompleted. - Load
steps/step-{NN}-*.md. - Execute. On completion, append NN to
stepsCompletedand re-invoke loader.
Harness adherence (non-negotiable)
- Follow the step sequence exactly. Do NOT skip steps or reorder them.
- Quality gates are not optional. QA runs automatically at step 7 — do NOT ask the user whether to run tests.
- Security and performance gates are auto-decided based on spec content — do NOT ask the user which gates apply.
- Each step file is a contract. Read it fully before executing. Step files override general guidelines.
- If a step halts (test failure, security finding, 2+ review cycles), stop and escalate to
@tech-lead. Do NOT proceed past a halt condition.
Step sequence
- Scope & Decision Anchoring (non-skippable gate) →
steps/step-00-scope-and-decision-anchoring.md—step_tracker.jsexits 1 if Step 1 begins without a locked track. Intent triage at gate: Clear (C ≥ 0.85) runs the locked track; Ambiguous (0.50–0.85) halts to a 2–3 Track Fork; Trivial (C < 0.50) executes directly. Gate enforced in allstep_trackingmodes includingoff(DNA 4). - Spec Alignment & Read Check →
steps/step-01-spec-alignment.md - Architecture (conditional: if ArchitectPhase: true) →
steps/step-02-architecture.md3a. Arch Review →steps/step-03a-arch-review.md3b. Backlog Prep →steps/step-03b-backlog-prep.md - Kanban Activation →
steps/step-04-kanban-activation.md - Spike (optional) →
steps/step-05-spike.md - Dev Loop (worktrees from step 3b, multi-developer OR single) →
steps/step-06-dev-loop.md6a. Fidelity Review (coverage contract + 10-class audit before QA — 02o) →steps/step-06a-fidelity-review.md - Quality Gates (QA hard gate → security conditional → performance conditional) →
steps/step-07-quality-gates.md - PM Verification →
steps/step-08-pm-verification.md - Documentation →
steps/step-09-documentation.md - Completion →
steps/step-10-completion.md
Halt conditions (any one halts the entire flow)
- Spec gap unfilled after 2 CR cycles
- Test failure that doesn't reproduce locally
- Security finding rated Critical or High
- 2 review loops exceeded (escalate to
@tech-lead)
State machine integration
At start: node .agents/scripts/orchestrator_state.js status
At each step end: node .agents/scripts/orchestrator_state.js step --name {step-name} --status {done/blocked}
At end: node .agents/scripts/orchestrator_state.js complete --agent developer --artifact 05-execution/{feature}.md
Memory integration
At start (step-01): Load context before reading any specs:
@memory-controller load developer [develop — {feature name}]After step-06 (dev loop complete): Write key implementation decisions:
@memory-controller write active-decisions.md
### [CODE] {feature} implementation decisions [date: YYYY-MM-DD] [agent: @developer]
{key decisions: patterns chosen, libraries used, tradeoffs made}
**Status:** activeAt completion (step-10): Write session summary — mandatory:
@memory-controller session-write [agent: @developer]
Worked on: {feature name} implementation — steps 01–10 complete
Decisions: {bullet list of key decisions, max 5}
Next step: {launch, iterate, or retro}
Blockers: {any unresolved issues or "none"}Two surfaces — every step
/develop ends by telling the owner two different things, and they must not be confused:
- Document surface —
develop-state.md,test-report.md,coverage-report.mdandqa-signoff.mdcarry the machine record: the verdict, the evidence, the counts. Plain sentence first, then the table. - Chat surface — the reply carries the plain sentence, the consequence, and the next action.
Never a gate token, and never a card field (
VERDICT:,Status:,Disposition:). A reader who has never seen this engine must be able to act on the sentence alone (.agents/references/vespyr-dna.md§Two surfaces).
State the consequence, not the label. [CONDITIONAL] is not "conditional" — it is "it ships,
but the PDF export fails above 500 rows and @developer owns it, due before launch."
Done when
develop_completion_check.js check --require-signoffexits 0- All steps in
stepsCompleted qa-signoff.mdexists with a bracketedGO/CONDITIONALverdict, and every condition it names carries an owner and a date- Phase advanced to quality
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

