build-app
Skill17 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
The front door for building a Streamlit-in-Snowflake app from idea to opened PR, or resuming one mid-build. Orchestrates spec, data discovery, page design, scaffold, a parallel page build and review by subagents, and ship, with human checkpoints between them. Start here for any new app, to document an existing one, to add a page, or to act on feedback about a live app. Use when the user says "build an app", "new dashboard", "add a page", "spec this out", "pick up where we left off", "here's feedback on <app>", "the numbers look wrong" or "polish this dashboard".
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- playcanvas/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- Pdiamondz1/hma_project_foundationtheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- butterbase-ai/butterbase-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- pobsteta/aigoratheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- adventurebeast/concoursetheir own version, first seen Sep 9, 2026
- tymrtn/tomorrowkit-for-mindstheir own version, first seen Aug 30, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- butterbase-ai/butterbase-plugin★ 535same name
- butterbase-ai/butterbase-skills★ 535same name
- playcanvas/skills★ 31same name
- cm-wada-yusuke/claude-code-product-workshop-kit★ 18same name
- day-ai/gtm-brain★ 9same name
- geod/oneprompt★ 4same name
- tymrtn/tomorrowkit-for-minds★ 4same name
- adventurebeast/concourse★ 3same name
- Pdiamondz1/hma_project_foundation★ 1same name
- pobsteta/aigora★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- releaseSkill
- migrate-appSkill
- onboardSkill
- preview-appSkill
- review-appSkill
- ship-appSkill
- sql-reviewSkill
- validate-appSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 37
Follow spec.md for apps/<slug>/REQUIREMENTS.md.
- Distinctive: line 42
Follow design.md: data-scout profiles the data into §3, app-designer plans every page (forms, copy, glossary, shared data) into §4–§8.
- Very specific: line 47
Follow scaffold.md: streamsnow new <domain> <function> (runtime from §9, _shared/runtime-decision.md), then the shared layer from the …
- Distinctive: line 53
Follow pages.md § Parallel build: one page-builder per §4 page, dispatched in one message.
- Distinctive: line 60
Follow verify.md: preview, walkthrough, then perf-reviewer, viz-critic,
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/build-app
Repo overlay: if
.streamsnow/overlays/build-app.mdexists in this repo, read it first — committed, repo-specific additions/overrides (_shared/overlays.md). Outside Claude Code, also read _shared/other-agents.md.
Lifecycle: spec → discover → design → scaffold → build → preview → verify → ship → done.
It reads apps/<slug>/REQUIREMENTS.md §11 to resume and never skips a checkpoint.
Orchestrator. You run every deterministic step (CLI, merges, generation, validation) and own the shared files; subagents get fixed briefs (briefs/) naming their inputs, the only files they may write, and the result they return. The CLI and gates decide pass/fail, never a subagent. No subagents? Follow each brief yourself (_shared/other-agents.md).
Modes
- Default — a new app, or a slug to resume from §11
Current phase; never restart a build. --spec [<slug>]— write or refresh the spec only, then stop. Covers new specs, tickets and backfill from an existing app's source (automatic whenapps/<slug>/has code). spec.md.<slug> --feedback "<feedback>"— classify feedback on a live app, then fix it via feedback.md.
Phase 0 · Preflight
- Report which
streamsnowruns and its version, then runstreamsnow doctor --format json. streamsnownot on PATH, arequiredcheck failing, or nostreamsnow.config.yaml: say "This machine or repo isn't set up yet, so I'm running onboarding first", follow /onboard in full, then continue (--specmay carry on without config).optionalfailures get one line.
Phase 1 — Spec, then CHECKPOINT 1
- Follow spec.md for
apps/<slug>/REQUIREMENTS.md. CP1: confirm its one-screen summary (pages and their questions, sources, TTLs, runtime). Block until confirmed.
Phase 2 — Discover and design, then CHECKPOINT 1b
- Follow design.md: data-scout profiles the data into §3, app-designer plans every page (forms, copy, glossary, shared data) into §4–§8. CP1b: the text wireframe.
Phase 3 — Scaffold the foundation
- Follow scaffold.md:
streamsnow new <domain> <function>(runtime from §9, _shared/runtime-decision.md), then the shared layer from the design: glossary,pages/_data.pyloaders, their queries, About page; commit onbuild/<slug>.
Phase 4 — Build pages in parallel
- Follow pages.md § Parallel build: one page-builder per §4 page,
dispatched in one message; each writes only its page and its own queries and returns its nav,
index and glossary entries. Merge them, run
streamsnow sql-review generate <slug>once, and commit the round: pages and their review SQL land together.
Phase 5 — Preview, verify, then CHECKPOINT 2
- Follow verify.md: preview, walkthrough, then perf-reviewer, viz-critic, streamlit-reviewer, cold-reader in parallel; fixes go to file owners, two rounds max. CP2: the user clicks through every page. Block until they answer.
Phase 6 — Check and ship, then CHECKPOINT 3
streamsnow validate-app <slug>until PASS (/validate-appexplains each FAIL); then follow/review-app's instructions in full and present its verdict.- CP3: validation passes, review is clean → ask the user to type
/ship-app <slug>; the agent cannot start it. A first deploy may need admin DDL (deploy-setup --admin): surface, don't run.
State — §11 Build Progress
A Current phase line (the lifecycle above) plus an append-only Sessions log whose last line
names the next command. Update it on every phase change; never rewrite past lines. On resume,
jump to Current phase. done or in-production (backfilled) means the app is live: new §4
pages re-enter at design; feedback uses --feedback, review depth /review-app.
Apps started before 0.8 name the old start-app skill in that log; say /build-app instead.
Out of scope
Porting an external app → /migrate-app; review depth → /review-app; live numbers →
/sql-review; machine, repo and Snowflake setup → /onboard.
Done when
The PR is open, streamsnow validate-app <slug> passes, and §11 reads Current phase: done.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

