agentleFS
kyle-chalmerskyle-chalmers/streamsnow/.claude/skills/release/SKILL.md

release

Skill17 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub

Maintainer-only release of StreamSnow, driven by scripts/release.py. One prompt ("cut the release", /release, /release X.Y.Z) runs it end to end, and publish.yml tags and publishes when the release PR merges. Also suggest, prepare <X.Y.Z>, verify <X.Y.Z>, and the by-hand fallback tag <X.Y.Z>.

  • Commits and pushes

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use create-agent-adapter, changelog-style and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    create-agent-adapter

    Technical guide for creating a new Paperclip agent adapter. Use when building a new adapter package, adding support for a new AI coding tool (e.g. a new CLI agent, API-based agent, or custom process), or when modifying the adapter system. Covers the required interfaces, module structure, registration points, and conventions derived from the existing claude-local and codex-local adapters.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • GrinvSkill

    changelog-style

    Turn a commit range into CHANGELOG.md entries following common-changelog style. Use when finishing a PR or cutting a release, to write/fix the [Unreleased] section's entries — moving [Unreleased] under a new dated version heading is a separate, automated step (see the release skill / scripts/sync-version.ts), not this skill's job.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • GrinvSkill

    docs-consistency-check

    Check README/manifest.json/server.json/CHANGELOG.md/AGENTS.md and docs/*.md for drift against the actual registered tools and source. Use after adding, renaming, or removing a tool, or as part of a live-audit pass.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    component-release

    Prepares a verifiable Agent Landing Zone UI release. Use for release branches, VERSION, changelog entries, tags, release notes, and compatibility evidence; never publish without explicit human approval.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    documentation-consistency

    Keeps AI Landing Zone contributor, user, and operator documentation aligned with shipped Bicep behavior. Use for parameters, defaults, outputs, topology, deployment flow, operations, or releases.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • rivet-devSkill

    launch-graphics

    Generate agentOS marketing/launch graphics (launch & social heroes, code-snippet cards) from the committed generators in docs-internal/graphics. Use when asked to make, update, or render an agentOS launch image, social image, "agentOS Apps" graphic, or technical code-snippet image.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from Grinv

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    The protocol: one prompt: When the maintainer asks for a release, run cut below to the end and hand nothing back.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Run the commands below exactly, in order, from the repo root.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    If a command exits non-zero, stop.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Never edit files by hand during a release.

    line 27
  5. Very specific:

    Never run git push, git commit, git tag, gh pr, gh release or uv publish yourself.

    line 28
  6. Distinctive:

    Never wait for or poll CI.

    line 30
  7. Very specific:

    Never run the by-hand tag unless the maintainer says "tag X.Y.Z" in the chat session.

    line 31
  8. Distinctive:

    Do its checklist yourself and report what you checked: read git log and git diff from the last tag to HEAD for real company, people or …

    line 42

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/release

You run exact commands and report their output. The script makes every decision. RELEASING.md is the source of truth for the procedure; this skill only drives the script. It is the maintainer-sanctioned exception to the rule in .claude/CLAUDE.md that puts tags and releases off-limits for agents.

The protocol: one prompt. When the maintainer asks for a release, run cut below to the end and hand nothing back. open-pr turns on the release PR's auto-merge, and when it merges publish.yml tags the commit (release.py tag --from-ci), publishes to PyPI and creates the GitHub Release. Merging is the publish decision; the maintainer made it by asking.

Rules

  1. Run the commands below exactly, in order, from the repo root.
  2. If a command exits non-zero, stop. Show its output verbatim, say what failed and why, and propose the fix. Never work around, skip or retry around a failing gate.
  3. Never edit files by hand during a release.
  4. Never run git push, git commit, git tag, gh pr, gh release or uv publish yourself; the script and publish.yml do those.
  5. Never wait for or poll CI. Report and stop.
  6. Never run the by-hand tag unless the maintainer says "tag X.Y.Z" in the chat session.

cut ("cut the release", /release, /release X.Y.Z)

  1. git status --porcelain. If it prints anything, stop and ask the user to commit or stash.
  2. Version: the one the maintainer named, else run uv run python scripts/release.py suggest and take its recommendation.
  3. git fetch origin, then git switch -c claude/release-X.Y.Z origin/main
  4. uv run python scripts/release.py prepare X.Y.Z. It raises the generated workflows' pin by itself when the old pin cannot install X.Y.Z. Add --pin-floor only for a patch whose generated workflows call a command added since the last release.
  5. Do its checklist yourself and report what you checked: read git log and git diff from the last tag to HEAD for real company, people or customer names, internal URLs, email addresses, ticket IDs and account locators; look at every changed image; note changes to LICENSE, README and CONTRIBUTING. If the Playwright CLI pin moved, or you find anything, stop and show it.
  6. uv run python scripts/release.py open-pr X.Y.Z --trailer "<line>", where <line> is the Co-Authored-By line from your own commit attribution instructions, copied verbatim (leave it out if you have none). With a pin floor from step 4, add --pin-floor-note "<why>".
  7. Show the output and stop: the PR merges itself when CI is green, and publish.yml takes it from there. Say /release verify X.Y.Z can confirm it later.

suggest

uv run python scripts/release.py suggest, and show the output verbatim.

prepare X.Y.Z

Steps 1, 3, 4 and 5 of cut, then stop and report.

verify X.Y.Z

uv run python scripts/release.py verify X.Y.Z; show the output verbatim. Exit 3 means still publishing (or still tagging): say so. Do not loop.

tag X.Y.Z (fallback, only after the maintainer says "tag X.Y.Z")

For when publish.yml refused to tag (verify names its run). Say: "Next you will see a permission prompt for the tag command. Approving it pushes the tag, which publishes to PyPI and cannot be undone." Then run uv run python scripts/release.py tag X.Y.Z and show the output verbatim. If it says to rerun with --release-only, say so and stop.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.