delegate
Skill4 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Delegate work from the current Claude Code or Codex session to other providers - Antigravity CLI, Codex CLI, and OpenRouter free models - using existing plan allowances without switching IDEs or chat apps, and picking a model that matches the task's difficulty and cost. Use when the user says delegate, orchestrate, use another provider, use a cheaper model, save tokens, run a code review, or asks for sub-agents. Also generates images for free.
78 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- brasillero/brstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- go-sphere/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- victor-falcon/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AlomoesDataScience/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lehcode/claudelegatetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewhale-hq/codewhale-plugin-marketplacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use state, preview and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillstate
Store and query a Microsoft Managed App's built-in state and file attachments with `ms project state` CLI schema commands and generated TypeScript clients. First, with the user signed in to the CLI, run `ms feature status --name state --json`; if `feature.enabled` is not `true`, recommend an alternative connector or data source.
Also in 3 projects that use this
kv0906Skillpreview
Render vault notes as styled HTML and open in browser. Turn markdown docs, decisions, progress reports into readable previews. Use for "/preview docs/project-a/checkout-flow.md", "/preview progress all", "/preview decide auth-approach", or when user wants to see a doc before sharing.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillprd
Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicolasestremSkilldocument
Create focused documentation for specific components or features
Also in 3 projects that use this
anombyte93Skilldiscover
Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillskill-authoring
Write Agent Skills that comply with the agentskills.io specification. WHEN: "create a skill", "new skill", "write a skill", "skill template", "skill structure", "review skill", "skill PR", "skill compliance", "SKILL.md format", "skill frontmatter", "skill best practices". DO NOT USE FOR: general documentation. INVOKES: vally CLI.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions78 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 78
- prassanna-ravishankar/repowire★ 270same name
- HurricaHjz/SecondSelf★ 156same name
- wlsdks/ontology-atlas★ 149same name
- HurricaHjz/second-yourself★ 105same name
- spmtitsolution/OpenBA-Kit★ 38same name
- pvjbuilds/delegate-router★ 32same name
- PyModel/claude-architect★ 31same name
- peterpme/skills★ 28same name
- jisuzzzz/haechi★ 17same name
- mhlaghari/stuntman★ 16same name
68 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 68 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 44
If a result looks confused, rerun a tier up rather than patching bad output yourself.
- Very specific: line 72
Read the diff and rerun the checks yourself.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 68 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Delegate
You are the orchestrator in the user's current agent: you own requirements, architecture and integration while delegates from other providers do work you have already specified. Keep the user in this session and bring the delegated result back here. Never accept a delegate's output unreviewed.
Quick start
delegate.sh providers [--check] # who's up; --check validates the key
delegate.sh read "<prompt>" [dir] # read/search/summarize (Gemini)
delegate.sh code "<prompt>" [dir] [--write] # ordinary implementation (Claude Sonnet)
delegate.sh hard "<prompt>" [dir] [--write] # subtle / cross-cutting (Claude Opus)
delegate.sh cheap "<prompt>" [dir] # trivial one-liners (Gemini Flash low)
delegate.sh review [dir] [--uncommitted|--base <branch>] [--by claude|codex] # cross-vendor review
delegate.sh codex "<prompt>" [dir] [--write] # the only delegate that can run shell/tests
delegate.sh or "<prompt>" [model] # free frontier model, best-first
delegate.sh image "<prompt>" out.png [--paid] # free; --paid to allow spending
delegate.sh skills [agy|codex] # what that provider actually hasThe delegating verbs (read code hard cheap codex or) also take --skill NAME or
--force-skill NAME; review does not. Run providers first.
(delegate.sh is symlinked into ~/.local/bin; source is in this skill's scripts/.)
Match the model to the difficulty
Picking by habit is the failure mode — everything to the cheap model, or everything to the strong one. Decide on the work:
| The work is… | Use |
| Subtle, cross-cutting, hard to reverse, security-sensitive | hard |
| A bounded change you could describe to a competent stranger | code |
| Reading, searching, tracing a call graph across many files | read |
| Mechanical and checkable at a glance — rename, regex, format | cheap |
If a result looks confused, rerun a tier up rather than patching bad output yourself; retries cost plan allowance, not tokens.
When two tiers both fit, split the work. Hard and needs tests is common: plan it with hard
read-only, then execute with codex --write, the only delegate that can run a build or test suite.
Provider order
- Antigravity — plan allowance, real file tools. Claude models reason best about code; Gemini is faster with the context for whole-tree reads. That split is what the verbs encode.
- OpenRouter free — when Antigravity is down, or one-shot text needing no repo context.
- Codex — adversarial review, and anything that must actually run commands.
delegate.sh review puts a different vendor's model against work you just accepted, because
reviewing code with the model that wrote it mostly confirms it. The reviewer is chosen from whichever
CLI you are running inside: in Claude Code it runs codex review (which also gets shell access to
run tests); inside Codex it reviews with Claude Opus via Antigravity. Override with
--by claude|codex. Use it after any non-trivial change, including your own.
Delegating well
A delegate has none of your context. Give paths, the exact change, the acceptance check, and "do not touch anything else".
Bad: fix the tests
Good: In /path/repo, src/board.ts:42 throws on empty input. Add a guard returning []. Run
npm test -- board. Change nothing else.
Read the diff and rerun the checks yourself. Verbs are read-only without --write; with it, the
script verifies the workspace actually changed, retries once on a model that writes reliably, and
fails loudly if nothing changed.
Skills are not picked up reliably on their own — use --force-skill when a skill matters, and
expect --skill to be ignored. Images have two free paths before anything paid; without --paid
the command fails rather than quietly spending, so ask before passing it.
Per-tier models are overridable (M_HARD M_CODE M_READ M_CHEAP M_WRITE); providers prints
the current wiring.
See REFERENCE.md for provider quirks, skill mechanics, free-model ranking, and the reasons behind each guard.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

