meeting-notes
Skill0 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turns a meeting transcript or rough notes into decisions, actions with owners and dates, open questions, and a short follow-up email draft. Works with a pasted transcript, a file, or a connected notes or recording tool. Use when asked to "write up this call", "analyse this meeting", "what did we agree", "meeting notes", "action items from this", "draft the follow-up", or when a transcript or recording link is shared and the user wants it worked up.
55 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- t128n/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- desertcache/agent-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- juliomrqz/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AgnesAI-Labs/agnet-skills-cntheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Works-HQ/ai-brain-starter-packtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Rome-1/obsidian-claude-startertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use email-draft, status-report and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
yakatotechSkillemail-draft
Create business email drafts. Use when asked to draft emails
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus-report
Generate a status report with KPIs, risks, and action items. Use when writing a weekly or monthly update for leadership, summarizing project health with green/yellow/red status, surfacing risks and decisions that need stakeholder attention, or turning a pile of project tracker activity into a readable narrative.
Also in 3 projects that use this
QuixiAISkillweekly-review
Review the past week across goals, tasks, calendar, journal, and commitments, then propose the next week
Also in 8 projects that use this
vijpatel7Skillcold-outreach
Write highly effective cold emails and LinkedIn messages to recruiters, hiring managers, founders, and engineers at target companies. Based on Ben Lang's proven cold outreach framework (Next Play). Use when the user wants to: (1) write a cold email to someone at a company they want to work for, (2) craft LinkedIn messages or InMail to recruiters or hiring managers, (3) reach out about unadvertised positions, (4) follow up on outreach or applications, (5) network with founders or executives for job opportunities, (6) prepare an outreach campaign to multiple companies. Triggers on: cold email, outreach, reach out to, contact recruiter, email founder, write to hiring manager, job email, networking email, LinkedIn message, InMail.
Also in 3 projects that use this
LangChainSkillweb-research
Use this skill for requests related to web research; it provides a structured approach to conducting comprehensive web research
Also in 4 projects that use this
jacobraskSkillcalendar
Interact with Apple Calendar via AppleScript. Use when the user asks to check calendar, view events, create events, manage schedule, find free time, or list calendars. Triggers include "my calendar", "my schedule", "calendar events", "create event", "add to calendar", "what's on my calendar", "free time", "available slots", "upcoming events", "today's events". Requires macOS with Calendar.app.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions55 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 55
- mergisi/awesome-openclaw-agents★ 4.1ksame name
- shiwenwen/hope-agent★ 1.9ksame name
- claude-office-skills/skills★ 433same name
- zrosenfield/sharepoint-ai-skills★ 96same name
- duncan-buildroom/freeskills★ 65same name
- jezweb/vite-flare-starter★ 49same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- charlie947/life-automation-skills★ 25same name
- arezous/pm-pilot★ 20same name
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroup★ 18same name
45 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- level-upSkill
- pushbackSkill
- setup-guideSkill
- solutions-shapeSkill
- write-playbookSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
25 rules. 0 are common, 25 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 43 edited versions we read keep these.
25
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Use the best source available, in this order:
- Distinctive: line 16
Connected notes or recording tool: If a meeting-notes, transcription, or recording tool is connected (any tool that returns a meeting's …
- Distinctive: line 20
Calendar: If a calendar is connected, use it to fill in the attendee list, date and meeting title, and to check the spelling of names.
- Distinctive: line 24
If you have nothing but a meeting title, ask for the notes.
- Distinctive: line 31
Read the whole thing before writing anything.
- Distinctive: line 35
If a decision was implied but never said out loud ("so...
- Distinctive: line 38
The person who decides has the last word: If everyone agrees but the decision-maker says "let me sleep on it" or "let's see", nothing was …
- Distinctive: line 41
Later beats earlier: If something is agreed and then reversed, paused or reassigned later in the same meeting, record only the final state …
- Distinctive: line 44
A recorded objection makes it provisional: If the notes hint someone disagreed, mark the decision *(confirm - X may have objected)* rather …
- Distinctive: line 47
Actions: Every action has three parts.
- Distinctive: line 63
Check that weekdays match dates ("Friday the 7th" when the 7th is a Saturday) and that two people did not give different dates for the same …
- Distinctive: line 74
Names: check proper nouns (people, companies, products) against the attendee list and any context you have.
- Distinctive: line 77
Never invent: No owner, date, number or decision that is not in the material.
- Distinctive: line 79
Attribute carefully: Only say "Sam agreed to..." if Sam did.
- Distinctive: line 81
Keep personal matters out: If the conversation strayed into someone's health, family, relationships, personal finances, job hunting or …
- Distinctive: line 86
No secrets: If a password, door or alarm code, key or account number was read out, do not copy it into the notes or the email.
- Distinctive: line 91
Use this structure. Lead with the summary so the whole meeting reads at a glance.
- Distinctive: line 119
Keep it short. A 45-minute call usually produces under a page.
- Distinctive: line 133
Write it from the user's point of view ("I'll send the revised quote by Thursday").
- Distinctive: line 134
It says no more than the notes: Every owner, date and commitment in the email must be in the write-up.
- Distinctive: line 152
Create the actions as tasks or tickets in a connected task tool (with approval).
- Distinctive: line 153
Add the due dates as calendar reminders.
- Distinctive: line 156
Do not do any of these without a yes.
- Distinctive: line 161
If asked to prep for a meeting with people you have notes on, pull the previous write-ups with those attendees and give a short brief: what …
- Distinctive: line 201
Your notes source: If you use a meeting recording or transcription tool, connect it so the skill can fetch transcripts directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 43 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Meeting notes
A meeting is only worth what it changes afterwards. Most notes record what was said. This skill records what was decided, who is doing what by when, and what is still open, then drafts the follow-up so it actually gets sent.
Get the material
Use the best source available, in this order:
- Connected notes or recording tool. If a meeting-notes, transcription, or recording tool is connected (any tool that returns a meeting's transcript or summary), find the meeting by title, date or attendee and pull the full transcript, not only the tool's summary. Summaries drop the decisions that were made in passing.
- Calendar. If a calendar is connected, use it to fill in the attendee list, date and meeting title, and to check the spelling of names.
- A file or a paste. A transcript, a recording's text export, or rough bullet notes.
If you have nothing but a meeting title, ask for the notes. Do not write up a meeting you have not seen.
Rough notes are fine. Work with what is there and flag anything you had to guess.
What to extract
Read the whole thing before writing anything. Then pull out:
Decisions. Things that were agreed and now change what people do. "We'll go with the annual plan", "launch moves to the 14th". Not opinions, not ideas floated and dropped. If a decision was implied but never said out loud ("so... we're doing the annual plan then?" with no objection), list it and mark it (implied - confirm).
- The person who decides has the last word. If everyone agrees but the decision-maker says "let me sleep on it" or "let's see", nothing was decided: it is an open question for them, not an implied decision.
- Later beats earlier. If something is agreed and then reversed, paused or reassigned later in the same meeting, record only the final state ("new supplier: on hold until legal has read the contract") and drop or pause the actions that hung off the original.
- A recorded objection makes it provisional. If the notes hint someone disagreed, mark the decision (confirm - X may have objected) rather than writing it as settled.
Actions. Every action has three parts. If one is missing, say so rather than invent it.
- What: a concrete deliverable, starting with a verb. "Send the revised quote", not "pricing".
- Owner: a named person who said they would do it. "We", "the team", "someone should" and "we'll look at it" are not owners, even when one person said the words or one person is the obvious candidate. If nobody took it, write Owner: unassigned and list it under open questions. Do not assign it to the speaker, the most senior person or the person it most affects. If two people both claimed it, say so and ask for one owner.
- Commitment strength: record what was actually said. "I'll try", "no promises" or "if I get X" is a tentative action: keep the hedge and the condition next to it ("Sam, will try; depends on the venue confirming"), not a firm promise.
- Due: the date the owner committed to. Convert relative dates ("by Friday", "next week") to real dates using the meeting date, and show both if it helps. Someone else's request ("the client wants it by the 3rd") is not the owner's due date: show it as the requested date or a risk. If no date was given, write Due: not set; "ASAP" stays ASAP. Check that weekdays match dates ("Friday the 7th" when the 7th is a Saturday) and that two people did not give different dates for the same thing. If anything clashes, do not pick one: write both and raise it as an open question.
Open questions. Things raised and not resolved, and anything needed before an action can start. Name who is best placed to answer each one.
Risks or concerns raised, briefly, if any were. Skip the section if none.
Accuracy rules
- Names: check proper nouns (people, companies, products) against the attendee list and any context you have. Transcription tools mangle names. If unsure, write the name as heard and add (spelling?).
- Never invent. No owner, date, number or decision that is not in the material. A gap you flag is useful; a gap you fill with a guess is a future argument.
- Attribute carefully. Only say "Sam agreed to..." if Sam did. If it is unclear who said something, do not attach a name.
- Keep personal matters out. If the conversation strayed into someone's health, family, relationships, personal finances, job hunting or private life, leave it out of the write-up and the email unless the user asks for it. Keep the operational fact and drop the reason: "Chris is off on the 9th; Ama covers the demo", never why Chris is off. Mention in your reply that you left something out, without repeating it.
- No secrets. If a password, door or alarm code, key or account number was read out, do not copy it into the notes or the email.
The write-up
Use this structure. Lead with the summary so the whole meeting reads at a glance.
# <Meeting title> - <DD Month YYYY>
**Attendees:** <names>
**Source:** <transcript / notes / recording tool>
## Summary
<One or two sentences: why the meeting happened and what came out of it.>
## Decisions
1. <Decision>
2. <Decision> *(implied - confirm)*
## Actions
| # | Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | <Verb-first deliverable> | <Name> | <DD Mon> |
| 2 | <...> | unassigned | not set |
## Open questions
- <Question> - best placed to answer: <name>
## Risks raised
- <Risk> (delete this section if none)Keep it short. A 45-minute call usually produces under a page. Do not narrate the discussion; the transcript exists if anyone wants it.
The follow-up email
Draft a short email the meeting owner can send to attendees the same day. It confirms the decisions and the actions, so anyone who remembers it differently says so now rather than in a fortnight.
- Subject: "
<Meeting title>- decisions and next steps" - Body: a one-line thank-you, the decisions as a short list, the actions as "Owner - action - due date", the open questions, and one line asking people to reply if anything is wrong or missing.
- Under 200 words. Plain, warm, no filler.
- Write it from the user's point of view ("I'll send the revised quote by Thursday").
- It says no more than the notes. Every owner, date and commitment in the email must be in the write-up. If an action is unassigned in the notes, it is unassigned in the email ("still needs an owner"), not quietly given to the sender or a colleague.
- Never promise more than was agreed. This matters most when the email goes to a client or supplier, where it reads as a commitment. A date that depended on something stays conditional ("possible if we have your logo files by Monday"). A request someone said they would think about (a discount, an extra feature, a big order) is "I'll come back to you on", never "yes". Nothing said only among your own side goes in.
Present it as a draft. Never send it yourself unless the user explicitly asks you to and you have a connected email tool. If they ask, show the final text and confirm before sending.
After the write-up
Offer, in one line, the most useful next step you can actually do with the tools you have. Pick one, not a menu. For example:
- Create the actions as tasks or tickets in a connected task tool (with approval).
- Add the due dates as calendar reminders.
- Save the write-up where the user keeps meeting notes.
Do not do any of these without a yes. Filing tickets or sending email on someone's behalf is outward-facing.
Preparing for a follow-up meeting
If asked to prep for a meeting with people you have notes on, pull the previous write-ups with those attendees and give a short brief: what was decided last time, which actions are still open (and whose), and the open questions worth raising. Do not write a new record for a meeting that has not happened.
Example
Input: a 30-minute transcript between a founder (Alex), a designer (Priya) and a client (Tom) about a website relaunch.
Output, abridged:
# Website relaunch check-in - 14 October 2026
**Attendees:** Alex, Priya, Tom (client)
## Summary
Reviewed the homepage design. Tom approved the direction; launch moves a week to fit
the extra case-study page.
## Decisions
1. Homepage design approved as shown.
2. Launch date moves from 21 to 28 October.
3. Case-study page added to launch scope *(implied - confirm)*.
## Actions
| # | Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Send two case-study drafts | Tom | 17 Oct |
| 2 | Design case-study page template | Priya | 21 Oct |
| 3 | Update project plan and share | Alex | 15 Oct |
| 4 | Confirm hosting renewal | unassigned | not set |
## Open questions
- Does the new launch date affect the press release? - best placed to answer: TomConfiguration
- Your notes source. If you use a meeting recording or transcription tool, connect it so the skill can fetch transcripts directly. Otherwise paste or attach the notes.
- Where write-ups go. A notes folder, a wiki, a CRM record. Tell Claude once and it will offer to save there.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

