level-up
Skill0 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Finds the single next thing worth automating in a small business or a personal workflow. Asks five short questions one at a time, then recommends one automation, says why it beats the runner-up, and says how it should be built (a scheduled script, a reusable skill or prompt, or an existing tool). Proposes only, never builds. Use when asked "what should I automate next", "level up", "where am I wasting time", "what's next to systemise", or as a weekly or monthly operating check-in.
18 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vikneshwaran16032005-alt/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- yowpi-tech/unbubbletheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- emiljuchnikowski/ai-os-templatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- holt-os/holttheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- sameerch1b/asi-ostheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- sohaibdevv/project-templatetheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use skill-builder, explain and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
BlockSkillskill-builder
Create, edit, or inspect Berd skills stored as skill folders with SKILL.md files. Use when the user wants to build a new skill, update an existing skill, convert a workflow into a reusable skill, or decide whether instructions, scripts, references, or assets belong in a skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
sunnyclinches44Skillexplain
Explains code using real-world analogies and ASCII diagrams
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillbuild
Build the TypeSpec Rust emitter from source. Run this after cloning the repo, after pulling changes, or when TypeScript source files have been modified.
Also in 3 projects that use this
wpankSkillsession-handoff
WHAT: Create comprehensive handoff documents that enable fresh AI agents to seamlessly continue work with zero ambiguity. Solves long-running agent context exhaustion problem.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions18 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 18
- nateherkai/AIS-OS★ 1.4ksame name
- alirezarezvani/gaios★ 37same name
- holt-os/holt★ 7same name
- daveebbelaar/project-template★ 4same name
- yowpi-tech/unbubble★ 4same name
- GerardoRdz96/aios-starter-kit★ 3same name
- vikneshwaran16032005-alt/claude-skills★ 3same name
- sohaibdevv/project-template★ 2same name
- boothy1021-bot/aios-microsoft★ 1same name
- cacardinal/laila★ 1same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- meeting-notesSkill
- pushbackSkill
- setup-guideSkill
- solutions-shapeSkill
- write-playbookSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Ask them one at a time. Wait for each answer, reflect it back in one line so the person knows you heard it, then ask the next.
- Distinctive: line 37
If they skip a question or say "nothing", accept it and move on.
- Distinctive: line 40
If you already have context on how they work (earlier in the conversation, or notes they have shared), use it to sharpen the questions, and …
- Distinctive: line 90
Ask all five questions at once.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Level up
Most people know they should automate more and do not know what to automate next. The usual result is either nothing, or a clever automation of something that did not matter.
This skill finds the one next automation with the best payoff, by asking a few sharp questions and then committing to a recommendation. It does not build anything. Building is the next conversation.
The five questions
Ask them one at a time. Wait for each answer, reflect it back in one line so the person knows you heard it, then ask the next. Never send them as a list: a list gets skimmed and half-answered.
- "What did you do by hand three or more times this week?" Repetition is the clearest signal. Ask for the boring specifics: which tool, how long each time.
- "What would break if ten times as many customers turned up on Monday?" This finds the single points of failure: the step that only works because volume is low, or because one person does it.
- "Which part of the business still runs entirely by hand?" Prompt with areas if they are stuck: getting paid, answering customers, scheduling, email, tasks, meetings, keeping knowledge written down.
- "What number do you check by hand that could just be sent to you?" Revenue, sign-ups, bookings, overdue invoices, stock. A number checked by hand is usually checked late or not at all.
- "What did you put off this week because it was fiddly or boring?" Avoided work is often the most valuable to automate, because it is currently not getting done.
If they skip a question or say "nothing", accept it and move on. If an answer is vague ("emails"), ask one follow-up for the specific case, then move on.
If you already have context on how they work (earlier in the conversation, or notes they have shared), use it to sharpen the questions, and skip any question it already answers.
Pick one
List the candidates from the answers, then choose one. Prefer the candidate that is:
- Frequent. It happens often, so the time saved compounds.
- Well specified. The steps are the same each time and you could write them down. A task that needs judgement each time is a poor first automation.
- Costly when missed. Late invoices, unanswered leads, a number nobody saw.
- Small to build. A first automation should be live within a day, not a quarter.
Name the runner-up in one line, so the person can overrule you knowingly. Do not present three equal options.
Say how it should be built
Match the build to the shape of the work. Choose the simplest thing that will do it.
- Fully specified, same steps every time (send the weekly numbers, chase invoices over 30 days, back up a folder): a scheduled script or a no-code automation that runs on a timer. Do not reach for an autonomous agent when a plain scheduled job will do; it is cheaper, more predictable and easier to fix.
- Repeatable but needs a bit of judgement (draft replies to common enquiries, write up meetings, triage a support inbox): a reusable skill or saved prompt that an assistant runs on request, with a human approving anything that goes out.
- Something an existing tool already does (the accounting tool can send reminders, the booking tool can confirm appointments): turn on that feature. Name the setting.
The recommendation
End with one short block:
Next automation: <what, in one line>
Why this one: <frequency, cost of missing it, and why it beats the runner-up>
Runner-up: <one line>
How to build it: <scheduled script / skill or saved prompt / existing feature, and the
first concrete step>
Time saved: <rough estimate per week, from their own answers>Then stop. If they want to build it, that is a new task. Offer once, in one line.
What it never does
- Build, edit or switch on anything. It proposes only.
- Offer a menu of equal options. One pick, one runner-up.
- Recommend an autonomous agent where a scheduled job would do.
- Ask all five questions at once.
Example
Q1: What did you do by hand three or more times this week? A: Copied new bookings from the booking form into the spreadsheet. About ten a day.
(Reflect, then Q2 to Q5. Answers: nothing would break at 10x except that spreadsheet; invoices are chased by hand; revenue is checked by logging into the bank.)
Next automation: Send each new booking straight to the spreadsheet. Why this one: Ten times a day, identical steps, and it is the one thing that breaks at higher volume. Beats invoice chasing because that happens weekly. Runner-up: Automatic reminders for invoices over 14 days overdue. How to build it: No-code automation: booking form "new submission" to "add row". Check whether the form tool has a native spreadsheet integration first. Time saved: About 1.5 hours a week.
Configuration
None. If you run it on a schedule (weekly works well), keep the previous recommendation to hand so the next run can check whether it was built.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

