agentleFS
kriscardkriscard/Skills/skills/obsidian/weekly-review/SKILL.md

weekly-review

Skill15 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Summarize a completed week's daily notes into key findings, potential atomic notes, and outstanding action items.

92 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use quarterly-review, daily-plan and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Phoenixrr2113Skill

    quarterly-review

    Quarterly review — strategic look at the last 3 months. Career trajectory, project health, life balance, big decisions ahead. Runs 1st of Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • steptianSkill

    daily-plan

    每日待办计划与日程管理。触发词:'今天要做'、'今日计划'、'今日待办'、'今天安排'、'安排一下'、'加个任务'、'记个任务'、'今日复盘'、'今日回顾'、'今天总结'、'本周计划'、'周总结'、'开始工作'、'上班了'、'完成了'、'加个日程'、'记个日程'、'改一下时间'、'日程调整'、'面试'、'开会'、'约了'。支持四象限优先级、时段分配、固定日程管理、智能时间估算、每日/每周复盘。当用户提到有明确时间的安排(如'下午两点面试'、'10点开会'),自动识别为日程并写入日程表。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • seedprodSkill

    daily-brief

    Send a morning briefing via Telegram with weather, news, and a motivational quote. Designed to run via launchd for automated daily delivery.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • claude-office-skillsSkill

    meeting-notes

    >

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Phoenixrr2113Skill

    morning-brief

    Full morning brief — calendar, email, meeting prep, execute actionable items, create follow-up tasks. Runs at 8:03 AM or when Randy asks for a morning update.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • zephyrwang6Skill

    daily-review

    每日工作回顾与洞察分析,对用户前一天的对话历史和使用数据进行总结与建议

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 80 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the vault's AGENTS.md and ../vault/SKILL.md for live paths, ownership, and safe-write rules.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    If the weekly note is missing, stop and report the gap.

    line 21
  3. Very specific:

    Read the weekly note and each existing YYYY-MM-DD.md daily note in the confirmed date range, in chronological order.

    line 30
  4. Distinctive:

    Read the active Weekly template to confirm the review headings, without changing it.

    line 50
  5. Very specific:

    Keep all three subsections.

    line 68

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 80 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Weekly Review

Summarize one calendar week's daily notes and write the result into that week's ## Weekly Review section. This is a retrospective, not a next-week planning workflow.

1. Confirm the review period

Read the vault's AGENTS.md and ../vault/SKILL.md for live paths, ownership, and safe-write rules. Resolve the requested ISO week or default to the most recently completed Monday–Sunday week. Locate its existing weekly note from the live vault convention and compute the exact seven-day range. Resolve each daily note by its own calendar date; an ISO week can cross a calendar-year folder boundary. Archived journals may be read as evidence, but archived weekly notes remain read-only.

If the weekly note is missing, stop and report the gap. Do not create or reconstruct it as a side effect. Ask when the requested period is partial or ambiguous. Confirm that the live vault contract permits weekly-review to manage only ## Weekly Review; otherwise return the draft without writing.

Completion: one existing weekly note, its exact Monday–Sunday range, and the write boundary for ## Weekly Review are confirmed.

2. Gather bounded evidence

Read the weekly note and each existing YYYY-MM-DD.md daily note in the confirmed date range, in chronological order. Follow links from those notes only when needed to understand an entry.

Extract:

CategoryEvidence to find
Key findingsInsights, learnings, realizations, decisions, and useful links
Potential atomic notesRecurring themes, surprising insights, new connections, or durable ideas
Action itemsOutstanding tasks, TODOs, and follow-ups

A potential atomic note should be worth remembering beyond the reviewed week. Deduplicate action items and exclude work already completed. Missing or sparse notes are evidence gaps, not proof that nothing happened. Use external systems only when the user explicitly requests them.

Completion: every proposed item traces to a weekly or daily note, a linked source, or an explicit user correction.

3. Draft Weekly Review

Read the active Weekly template to confirm the review headings, without changing it. If its structure differs from the one below, show the discrepancy and agree on the target before writing.

Draft this review structure:

## Weekly Review

### Key Findings
- [Finding with relevant [[wikilinks]] inline]

### Potential Atomic Notes
- **[Proposed title as insight]**: [why it deserves its own note]

### Action Items
- [ ] [Outstanding follow-up]

Keep all three subsections. Replace example bullets with the week's evidence; use - None identified. when a subsection has no supported items. Keep relevant links inline instead of adding a separate link dump. Potential atomic notes are proposals only: do not create them. Action items are outstanding follow-ups, not automatic commitments for the next week.

Completion: the draft is concise, deduplicated, and every factual statement is supported.

4. Approve, write, and verify

Show the exact proposed ## Weekly Review section and obtain explicit approval through the vault safe-write flow. If the section already exists, replace only its three review subsections. If it is absent, append the complete section. Preserve Focus for this week and every other existing section.

Reread the affected weekly note. Verify that there is exactly one ## Weekly Review section, its three subsections match the approved draft, and no other content changed. Return the written review, evidence gaps, and whether the note changed.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.