weekly-review
Skill479 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Prepare a weekly project review from configured sources. Reference workflow requiring external helper scripts that are not bundled here.
92 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nicolas-diez/personal-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- totorototo/ledgertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TalkToHumans/pull-labtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Castan-AI/founder-commandstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jwm-axoni/claude-workbenchtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ArchitektApx/cursor-skills-for-claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use quarterly-review, daily-plan and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Phoenixrr2113Skillquarterly-review
Quarterly review — strategic look at the last 3 months. Career trajectory, project health, life balance, big decisions ahead. Runs 1st of Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct.
Also in 3 projects that use this
steptianSkilldaily-plan
每日待办计划与日程管理。触发词:'今天要做'、'今日计划'、'今日待办'、'今天安排'、'安排一下'、'加个任务'、'记个任务'、'今日复盘'、'今日回顾'、'今天总结'、'本周计划'、'周总结'、'开始工作'、'上班了'、'完成了'、'加个日程'、'记个日程'、'改一下时间'、'日程调整'、'面试'、'开会'、'约了'。支持四象限优先级、时段分配、固定日程管理、智能时间估算、每日/每周复盘。当用户提到有明确时间的安排(如'下午两点面试'、'10点开会'),自动识别为日程并写入日程表。
Also in 3 projects that use this
seedprodSkilldaily-brief
Send a morning briefing via Telegram with weather, news, and a motivational quote. Designed to run via launchd for automated daily delivery.
Also in 5 projects that use this
claude-office-skillsSkillmeeting-notes
>
Also in 8 projects that use this
zephyrwang6Skilldaily-review
每日工作回顾与洞察分析,对用户前一天的对话历史和使用数据进行总结与建议
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheCraigHewittSkillresearch-brief
Produces a one-page research brief on a topic, person, or company — what they do, what matters, what's changed recently, sources. Use when the user asks to research, look into, brief me on, or get context on a specific topic, company, competitor, or person. Pulls from the web, any project context, and recent emails involving the subject.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions92 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 92
- QuixiAI/agi-memory★ 623same name
- QuixiAI/Hexis★ 623same name
- andreaskelm/pm-brain★ 235same name
- duncan-buildroom/freeskills★ 65same name
- andrehuang/researcher-pack★ 50same name
- seandavi/lifeos-template★ 46same name
- chacosoldier/compabob★ 34same name
- cookyman74/llmwiki-harness★ 34same name
- jexchan/dailyup-second-brain-starter★ 33same name
- charlie947/life-automation-skills★ 25same name
82 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- aniket-meSkill
- announcement-digestSkill
- checkinSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dr-synthesizeSkill
- goals-reviewSkill
- morning-briefSkill
- post-meetingSkill
- pre-meeting-briefSkill
- proposal-reviseSkill
- proposal-writeSkill
- schedule-querySkill
- setup-project-managementSkill
- tax-guideSkill
- tips-curateSkill
- tips-integrateSkill
- tips-scoutSkill
- todo-addSkill
- todo-queueSkill
- todo-reviewSkill
- triage-inboxSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
42 rules. 0 are common, 23 are distinctive, and 19 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 80 edited versions we read keep these.
23
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
19
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 31
If GOOGLE_WORKSPACE_MCP_USER_EMAIL is unset on a machine that has only one credentials file, scripts fall back to the legacy default.
- Very specific: line 38
Read .claude/CLAUDE.md from the current project folder
- Distinctive: line 44
If config is missing required fields, stop and surface the errors — do not fall back to legacy mode silently
- Very specific: line 47
Check 10_AI_Collaboration/Weekly_Reviews/ for most recent weekly-review-*.md or whatsapp-summary-*.md file
- Distinctive: line 48
Use that date as start_date (or 7 days ago if none exists)
- Very specific: line 54
If you have a transcript export tool (e.g., granola-fetch, Otter export):
- Distinctive: line 56
Check the project's configured transcripts folder for existing files
- Very specific: line 58
If config has
granola_folders(list): Run your fetcher once per folder, letting your routing config dispatch destinations - Very specific: line 59
If config has
granola_folder(single string): Run with that folder name - Very specific: line 62
Normalize transcripts (v1.9 — fixes RTF/PDF handling): Run the bundled normalize-transcripts.py:
- Distinctive: line 68
Do NOT prompt for confirmation — transcript fetching and normalization are non-destructive.
- Very specific: line 74
Search for group using WhatsApp MCP (list_chats)
- Very specific: line 75
Do NOT rely on list_chats metadata for last-message dates — metadata is often stale
- Very specific: line 76
ALWAYS fetch actual messages using list_messages regardless of metadata
- Distinctive: line 78
If WhatsApp MCP fails: retry once.
- Very specific: line 83
Read all transcript files from the configured transcripts folder.
- Distinctive: line 87
After reading each transcript, classify it before using it:
- Distinctive: line 93
Do NOT include hollow transcripts in Detailed Meeting Records.
- Very specific: line 103
Gmail Retrieval Strategy: Use individual get_gmail_message_content calls (avoid batch size limits).
- Distinctive: line 105
If Gmail MCP unavailable: Note "Gmail unavailable - skipped" and continue
- Distinctive: line 118
When in doubt: Omit specific sensitive content and note "[Some content omitted — PI review recommended]"
- Distinctive: line 137
Read the current dashboard content from the Google Doc (Tab 1)
- Distinctive: line 144
Read unresolved comments and apply corrections before synthesis.
- Very specific: line 146
Call mcp__google_workspace__read_document_comments on the project's Google Doc
- Distinctive: line 155
If classification is ambiguous, default to question (surface to user rather than misapply)
- Very specific: line 156
If read_document_comments fails: note "Comments unavailable — skipped" and continue
- Distinctive: line 157
If zero unresolved comments: no output, no additional calls — move on
- Distinctive: line 173
No markdown tables — use bullet/sub-bullet format for all structured data
- Very specific: line 177
ASCII emoji placeholders: Use [RED], [GREEN], [YELLOW] instead of real emoji (red/green/yellow circles) in generated text.
- Distinctive: line 185
Generate Tab 1 (Dashboard): Start from previous dashboard, update with this week's info.
- Very specific: line 213
If
tab1only: Only execute the Dashboard Replacement phase. - Very specific: line 214
If
tab2only: Only execute the Weekly Log Prepend phase. - Distinctive: line 249
If corrections were applied from comments: list them briefly
- Distinctive: line 250
If any comments were classified as questions/ambiguous: list them with anchor text so the user can address manually
- Distinctive: line 255
After the weekly review is complete:
- Very specific: line 257
Create archive folder if needed: [project]/10_AI_Collaboration/Transcripts/archive/
- Very specific: line 303
If project config missing: "No .claude/CLAUDE.md found.
- Distinctive: line 304
If config has malformed YAML: stop and surface the errors.
- Distinctive: line 305
If WhatsApp unavailable: Continue with other sources, note in output
- Distinctive: line 306
If no transcripts folder: Create it, note "No transcripts folder found - created"
- Distinctive: line 307
If Google Doc update fails: Save Tab 1 content locally, provide manual instructions
- Distinctive: line 312
After completing all steps above:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 80 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Weekly Project Review
v1.9.1 — Stricter YAML config parsing (loud failure on malformed .claude/CLAUDE.md); helper scripts for multi-tab Google Doc writes (replace-dashboard.py, insert-weekly-log.py); RTF/PDF transcript normalization (normalize-transcripts.py); hollow-transcript handling per-meeting; document-comment processing (read, apply corrections, reply, resolve).
Generate a comprehensive weekly summary for the current research project, pulling from multiple sources.
Public reference, not a complete install. This file describes a workflow that uses three external Python helpers:
normalize-transcripts.py,replace-dashboard.py, andinsert-weekly-log.py. Those helpers are not included in this public repository. Set up and review suitable helpers and account connections before running this workflow.
Overview
This skill collects data from WhatsApp, meeting transcripts, and Gmail, then generates:
- Tab 1 content: High-level project dashboard (updated directly in Google Doc)
- Tab 2 content: Detailed weekly log with thematic synthesis across all sources
Prerequisites
Before fetching, normalizing, archiving or writing anything, verify the three helper files at the configured WEEKLY_REVIEW_HELPERS path and the intended account/project configuration. If any helper is missing, stop and report the missing dependency. Do not invent a bundled scripts directory, silently skip that work, or substitute a different account. The public file alone does not provide those dependencies.
The skill expects three env vars on each machine (set in ~/.zprofile or equivalent):
export GOOGLE_WORKSPACE_MCP_USER_EMAIL="<your@email>" # account to authenticate as
export GOOGLE_WORKSPACE_MCP_CREDENTIALS_FILE="<path>" # optional; defaults to ~/.google_workspace_mcp/credentials/<email>.json
export WEEKLY_REVIEW_HELPERS="<path>" # required for a public adaptation; point to reviewed local helpersIf GOOGLE_WORKSPACE_MCP_USER_EMAIL is unset on a machine that has only one credentials file, scripts fall back to the legacy default. Multi-account machines must set the env var explicitly — the helper scripts do NOT silently glob-pick the first credentials file (this prevents silent wrong-account writes).
The skill also requires every project .claude/CLAUDE.md to carry a single ```yaml block under ## Structured Config (machine-readable). The prefetch parser only reads fenced blocks; loose top-level YAML in prose is ignored.
Instructions
Step 0: Read Project Configuration
- Read
.claude/CLAUDE.mdfrom the current project folder - Extract ALL of: project name, Google Doc ID (
google_doc_id), team roster, WhatsApp groups (with JIDs), folder paths,granola_folderorgranola_folders,project_keywords,exclude_keywords - Fields must appear inside
```yamlcode blocks; loose top-level YAML is ignored - Strip surrounding quotes from extracted values
- Extract
project_type(default: "quantitative"). Ifproject_type: qualitative, use the qualitative dashboard template - Extract
skip_meeting_log(boolean, default false). Iftrue, Tab 2 generation is skipped entirely - If config is missing required fields, stop and surface the errors — do not fall back to legacy mode silently
Step 1: Determine Date Range
- Check
10_AI_Collaboration/Weekly_Reviews/for most recentweekly-review-*.mdorwhatsapp-summary-*.mdfile - Use that date as start_date (or 7 days ago if none exists)
- end_date = today
- Tell user: "Generating weekly review for [start_date] to [end_date]"
Step 1.5: Populate Transcripts (Optional)
If you have a transcript export tool (e.g., granola-fetch, Otter export):
- Check the project's configured transcripts folder for existing files
- Fetch transcripts based on config:
- If config has
granola_folders(list): Run your fetcher once per folder, letting your routing config dispatch destinations - If config has
granola_folder(single string): Run with that folder name - If neither field exists: Skip and continue with existing transcripts
- Strip surrounding quotes from folder names before passing to CLI
- If config has
- Normalize transcripts (v1.9 — fixes RTF/PDF handling). Run the bundled
normalize-transcripts.py:
This converts anypython3 "$WEEKLY_REVIEW_HELPERS/normalize-transcripts.py" \ --folder "[transcripts_folder]" --json-output --apply.rtf(viatextutil) or.pdf(viapdftotext) for which there's no full.txtsibling, archives the originals, and replaces hollow.txtstubs when a converted sidecar is available. The script is idempotent and a no-op when there's nothing to do. - Do NOT prompt for confirmation — transcript fetching and normalization are non-destructive.
Step 2: Collect Data (with graceful degradation)
2a. WhatsApp Messages
- For each group in
whatsapp_groups:- Search for group using WhatsApp MCP (
list_chats) - Do NOT rely on
list_chatsmetadata for last-message dates — metadata is often stale - ALWAYS fetch actual messages using
list_messagesregardless of metadata - Filter to messages within date range
- Search for group using WhatsApp MCP (
- If WhatsApp MCP fails: retry once. If still unavailable: Note "WhatsApp unavailable - skipped" and continue
- Save raw messages to
10_AI_Collaboration/Weekly_Reviews/whatsapp-summary-[date].md
2b. Meeting Transcripts
Read all transcript files from the configured transcripts folder. Support multiple formats: Granola export, manual markdown, Zoom .vtt files.
Hollow transcript check (apply per-transcript):
After reading each transcript, classify it before using it:
- FULL: ≥5,000 characters AND contains conversational speaker content (dialogue lines, speaker labels, or
.vttZoom format) - HOLLOW: <5,000 characters OR content starts with
###markdown headers OR primary structure is bullet points with no speaker attribution
For each hollow transcript:
- Note it in Data Source Alerts: "[Meeting name] ([date]): AI notes only — full transcript not yet processed. Detailed meeting record omitted."
- Do NOT include hollow transcripts in Detailed Meeting Records. Use only for background context.
If ALL transcripts in the period are hollow AND there are no other substantive sources: Stop and ask the user whether to retry later or proceed without detailed meeting records.
2c. Gmail Threads
- Date range: Same as other sources
- Filter criteria (emails must match at least one):
- Sender OR recipient matches any team member email in roster
- Subject or body contains project keywords from
project_keywords
- Exclusions: Automated emails, calendar invites (
.ics), newsletters, bulk mail; threads matchingexclude_keywords - Gmail Retrieval Strategy: Use individual
get_gmail_message_contentcalls (avoid batch size limits). If batch fails: fall back to individual fetches - Feedback loop: At end of Gmail section, list included/excluded counts for noise control
- If Gmail MCP unavailable: Note "Gmail unavailable - skipped" and continue
2d. Sensitive Content Filtering
The weekly summary may be shared with the full team. Screen for and exclude sensitive content from ALL sources:
Exclude: Critical performance comments, hiring/firing discussions, pay/compensation, personnel-specific funding decisions, anything inappropriate for full team.
Screening by source type:
- General team meetings: Low sensitivity — include freely
- PI-only or PI + Research Manager threads: Screen MORE AGGRESSIVELY but include non-sensitive content
- 1-on-1 transcripts: Review for sensitive topics before including
When in doubt: Omit specific sensitive content and note "[Some content omitted — PI review recommended]"
Include freely: Funding strategy, project decisions, action items, research design, logistics, strategic direction.
Step 2e: Verify Key Metrics Against Authoritative Sources
Verify all quantitative claims against authoritative sources before generating content.
Priority order for factual claims:
- Research Design and Progress document (if maintained) — check for verified figures
- Earlier weekly summaries — if they post-date the research design doc
- Current week's sources — only if #1 and #2 unavailable; FLAG if uncertain
Watch for red flags: round numbers, hedged statements, conflicting numbers, numbers without context.
Step 2f: Read Previous Dashboard as Baseline
The Project Status Dashboard is a living document — read current state before writing.
- Read the current dashboard content from the Google Doc (Tab 1)
- This is your BASELINE — not a blank slate
- PRESERVE previous content unless explicitly superseded, factually outdated, or explicitly removed by user
- MODIFY existing sections with new information; ADD new items; REMOVE only when completed/superseded
Step 2g: Process Google Doc Comments
Read unresolved comments and apply corrections before synthesis.
- Call
mcp__google_workspace__read_document_commentson the project's Google Doc - Filter to unresolved comments only (skip any marked
[RESOLVED]) - For each unresolved comment, classify based on content:
- Correction: contains "should be", a number, "wrong", "change to", "actually", "not X but Y", or a clear factual fix. Apply it.
- Question/ambiguous: contains "?", "should we", "is this right", or intent is unclear. Surface in Step 7 output.
- Apply corrections:
- Tab 1 comments: incorporate into the dashboard baseline (modify before synthesis)
- Tab 2 comments: apply as direct edits to the Google Doc during Step 6
- Reply + resolve each applied correction: reply with "Applied in weekly review [DATE]. [Brief description of change]." then resolve via
resolve_document_comment - If classification is ambiguous, default to question (surface to user rather than misapply)
- If
read_document_commentsfails: note "Comments unavailable — skipped" and continue - If zero unresolved comments: no output, no additional calls — move on
Note: The API returns comments across all tabs. Use the comment's anchor text to determine which tab/section it belongs to.
Step 3: Synthesize
Detail and Length Requirements: Scale to meeting length:
- Brief check-ins (under 20 min): 0.5-1 page
- Standard meetings (20-60 min): 1-3 pages
- Long strategy sessions (60+ min): 2-4 pages
Guiding principle: Include more detail when in doubt. A reader who wasn't at the meeting should understand WHAT was decided, WHY, WHO said it, and the context.
Priority-Related Content Detection: Watch for "strategic priority", "operational", "critical path", "green/yellow/red", "urgent", "success factor" language. Note status changes.
FORMATTING RULES:
- No markdown tables — use bullet/sub-bullet format for all structured data
- Bold labels followed by content on same line or as sub-bullets
- Bold team member names throughout both Tab 1 and Tab 2 (track bold ranges separately; do not embed
**markdown markers in the text — formatting is applied via API) - Paraphrase rather than quoting. Do not include direct quotes or "Key Quotes" sections.
- ASCII emoji placeholders: Use
[RED],[GREEN],[YELLOW]instead of real emoji (red/green/yellow circles) in generated text. Real emoji break Google Docs index calculations. They are swapped to real emoji in Phase 5.
Visual Separators:
- Between weekly summaries: heavy double-line separator
- Within weekly summaries: medium single-line separator
Language Guidelines: Plain, accessible language. Avoid jargon. Use "challenges" not "blockers", "unclear" not "TBD". Prefer concrete descriptions over abstract terms.
Generate Tab 1 (Dashboard): Start from previous dashboard, update with this week's info. Structure:
- Project overview and status
- Strategic objectives and progress
- Operational objectives serving each strategic goal
- Team member to-do items
- Critical success factors with status (green/yellow/red)
- Funding pipeline
If skip_meeting_log: true: Skip Tab 2 generation entirely. Proceed to Step 4. Still use transcripts and WhatsApp data for Tab 1 dashboard content.
Generate Tab 2 (Weekly Log) (skip if skip_meeting_log: true): New entry prepended (reverse chronological). Structure:
- Date range header
- Weekly Activity Summary (thematic synthesis across all sources)
- Detailed Meeting Records (full summaries of each meeting)
Step 4: Save Local Copies
Skip if nosave argument.
- Weekly Summary: Save to
10_AI_Collaboration/Weekly_Reviews/weekly-review-[date].md
Step 5: Write to Google Doc (No Review Gate)
Proceed directly to Step 6 — do NOT display content in terminal for review. User reviews formatted content in the Google Doc.
Step 6: Update Google Doc
If skip_meeting_log: true: Skip the Weekly Log Prepend phase entirely.
If tab1only: Only execute the Dashboard Replacement phase. Skip Weekly Log Prepend.
If tab2only: Only execute the Weekly Log Prepend phase. Skip Dashboard Replacement.
Precondition: The Google Doc must have all 3 markers (=== PROJECT STATUS DASHBOARD ===, === DASHBOARD END ===, === WEEKLY SUMMARIES START ===). If DASHBOARD END is missing, STOP and report — do not fall back to the old 2-marker approach.
6-Phase Protocol:
- Preparation — Generate text with
[RED]/[GREEN]/[YELLOW]ASCII placeholders; strip**markdown bold markers (bold is applied via API, not text) - Dashboard Replacement — v1.9 — call the bundled
replace-dashboard.py. Handles multi-tabtabIdcorrectly (the MCP'sbatch_update_docdoes not):
Parse the JSON output:python3 "$WEEKLY_REVIEW_HELPERS/replace-dashboard.py" \ --document-id "$GOOGLE_DOC_ID" --tab-id "t.0" \ --start-marker "=== PROJECT STATUS DASHBOARD ===" \ --end-marker "=== DASHBOARD END ===" \ --content-file /tmp/dashboard-replacement-$(date +%s).txt \ --json-output --applystatusisapplied,noop, orerror. Stop on error. - Verification — Confirm all 3 markers intact after dashboard write
- Weekly Log Prepend — v1.9 — call the bundled
insert-weekly-log.py:python3 "$WEEKLY_REVIEW_HELPERS/insert-weekly-log.py" \ --document-id "$GOOGLE_DOC_ID" --tab-id "t.0" \ --marker "=== WEEKLY SUMMARIES START ===" \ --content-file /tmp/weekly-log-$(date +%s).txt \ --json-output --apply - Emoji Swap — Use
find_and_replace_doc(this MCP tool DOES correctly accepttab_id) to replace[RED]/[GREEN]/[YELLOW]with the real circle emoji - Formatting — Apply heading sizes and team-name bolding using API-reported indices (from
inspect_doc_structure), not calculated offsets
Phase 6 is required. The document is unreadable without proper header sizes and bold formatting. After Phases 1-5, proceed to Phase 6 and apply at minimum: (a) Tier 2 baseline format reset (11pt non-bold on full range), then (b) Tier 1 section header formatting (16pt/14pt/12pt bold).
Formatting scope: FULL DOCUMENT. Even when running tab1only or tab2only, Phase 6 formats the entire document. Formatting is idempotent.
Step 7: Final Confirmation
- Confirm: "Weekly review complete. Google Doc updated."
- Provide link: "Check Google Doc: [link]"
- If corrections were applied from comments: list them briefly
- If any comments were classified as questions/ambiguous: list them with anchor text so the user can address manually
- Note any other issues or manual fixes needed
Step 8: Archive Processed Transcripts
After the weekly review is complete:
- Create archive folder if needed:
[project]/10_AI_Collaboration/Transcripts/archive/ - Move all processed transcript files to archive (both Granola and Zoom for same meeting)
- Confirm: "Archived X transcript(s) to Transcripts/archive/"
- Note any files left behind (outside date range, unparseable)
Legacy-format files are archived as-is. No automatic renaming.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS can include:
nosave— Don't save intermediate filestab1only— Only generate Tab 1 dashboardtab2only— Only generate Tab 2 detailed logdays:N— Override date range to last N dayssince:YYYY-MM-DD— Override start dateskipwhatsapp— Skip WhatsApp even if availableskipemail— Skip email even if configuredskiparchive— Don't archive transcripts after processing
Examples
/weekly-review # Full review, default date range
/weekly-review days:14 # Last 14 days
/weekly-review tab1only # Quick dashboard update
/weekly-review skipwhatsapp # Skip WhatsApp if it's being flakyCustomization Points
To set up this skill for your workflow:
- Folder paths: The default
10_AI_Collaboration/Weekly_Reviews/path reflects one project structure. Update to match your own — e.g.,~/Research/Project/reviews/ordocs/weekly-reviews/. - Data sources: The skill pulls from WhatsApp, meeting transcripts, and Gmail by default. Remove or add sources in the data collection steps to match your available integrations.
- Google Doc format: The 3-marker system requires markers in your Google Doc. See Step 6 for setup.
- Dashboard template: The default is quantitative. Set
project_type: qualitativein your project config for a qualitative dashboard. - Transcript formats: Support for Granola, Zoom
.vtt, manual markdown, RTF/PDF normalization. Add new format parsers as needed. - Helper scripts location: The original workflow expects
normalize-transcripts.py,replace-dashboard.py, andinsert-weekly-log.py. This public repository does not include them. SetWEEKLY_REVIEW_HELPERSto the directory containing your reviewed local helpers and verify all three files before use.
Error Handling
- If project config missing: "No .claude/CLAUDE.md found. Please run from a configured project folder."
- If config has malformed YAML: stop and surface the errors. Do not fall back silently.
- If WhatsApp unavailable: Continue with other sources, note in output
- If no transcripts folder: Create it, note "No transcripts folder found - created"
- If Google Doc update fails: Save Tab 1 content locally, provide manual instructions
- Flag any ambiguities: "Unclear who said X - please clarify"
Performance Logging
After completing all steps above:
echo "$(date +%Y-%m-%d),weekly-review,TOOL_CALLS,NOTES" >> ~/.claude-assistant/logs/skill-performance.csvReplace TOOL_CALLS with your exact count. No ~ prefix. Replace NOTES with brief volume info (e.g., "3 transcripts 12 emails 2 whatsapp"). Do not skip this step.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

