goals-review
Skill479 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review quarterly objectives, progress scores and deadlines using the configured goals file.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- aniket-meSkill
- announcement-digestSkill
- checkinSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dr-synthesizeSkill
- morning-briefSkill
- post-meetingSkill
- pre-meeting-briefSkill
- proposal-reviseSkill
- proposal-writeSkill
- schedule-querySkill
- setup-project-managementSkill
- tax-guideSkill
- tips-curateSkill
- tips-integrateSkill
- tips-scoutSkill
- todo-addSkill
- todo-queueSkill
- todo-reviewSkill
- triage-inboxSkill
- weekly-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 69
All objectives with key results and current progress scores
- Very specific: line 74
If goals.yaml is missing, prompt the user to create it from the template.
- Distinctive: line 83
Search Granola for meetings in last 2 weeks mentioning papers, manuscripts, or writing
- Distinctive: line 84
Check Gmail for recent co-author emails (sent items) to gauge feedback turnaround
- Distinctive: line 87
Check Reminders (via osascript, macOS) for grant-related items
- Distinctive: line 88
Search Gmail for "grant report" or "progress report" in last 30 days
- Distinctive: line 91
Check Gmail sent folder for team member response patterns
- Distinctive: line 92
Search Granola for recent project meetings
- Distinctive: line 96
If any source is unavailable, note it and continue — never block on a failed query
- Very specific: line 149
After the user provides updates, write the updated goals.yaml file.
- Very specific: line 153
Update next_review in goals.yaml to 14 days from today.
- Distinctive: line 155
Check if a biweekly reminder exists.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Goals Review
v1.1 — Adapted for public use. Review quarterly objectives, update progress scores, and manage deadlines.
Review quarterly objectives, update progress scores, surface deadlines, and recalibrate priorities. Run biweekly or on demand.
Prerequisites
Required:
~/.claude-assistant/config/goals.yaml— objectives file (see First-Time Setup)
Optional (for evidence gathering):
- Gmail MCP — for email activity evidence
- Google Calendar MCP — for meeting alignment evidence
- Granola MCP — for meeting transcript evidence
- Apple Reminders (macOS only) — for task-related evidence
First-Time Setup
- Create config directory:
mkdir -p ~/.claude-assistant/config mkdir -p ~/.claude-assistant/logs - Download goals template:
curl -o ~/.claude-assistant/config/goals.yaml \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/chrisblattman/claudeblattman/main/templates/goals-yaml-template.yaml - Edit goals.yaml with your objectives, weights, and key results.
- Test with status view:
/goals-review status
Customization Points
| Setting | Where to Configure | Default |
| Model | Frontmatter model: line | sonnet (remove to use default) |
| Objectives | goals.yaml → objectives | Template examples |
| Push level | goals.yaml → meta.push_level | moderate |
| Review frequency | Step 5 below | Biweekly (14 days) |
| Evidence sources | Step 2 below | All available MCPs |
| Performance log | Step 6 below | ~/.claude-assistant/logs/skill-performance.csv |
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS can include:
- (none) — full review with interactive progress updates
status— quick dashboard only (no interactive updates)deadlines— show only upcoming deadlines
Instructions
Step 1: Read Goals Config
Read ~/.claude-assistant/config/goals.yaml.
Extract:
- All objectives with key results and current progress scores
push_levelsettingupcoming_deadlineslistnext_reviewdate
If goals.yaml is missing, prompt the user to create it from the template.
Step 2: Gather Evidence (parallel where possible)
For each active objective, gather recent signals using available MCP tools:
Example patterns by objective type:
Research Output:
- Search Granola for meetings in last 2 weeks mentioning papers, manuscripts, or writing
- Check Gmail for recent co-author emails (sent items) to gauge feedback turnaround
Grant Management:
- Check Reminders (via osascript, macOS) for grant-related items
- Search Gmail for "grant report" or "progress report" in last 30 days
Team Effectiveness:
- Check Gmail sent folder for team member response patterns
- Search Granola for recent project meetings
General pattern:
- Match each objective's name and key_results against email subjects, meeting titles, and reminder names
- If any source is unavailable, note it and continue — never block on a failed query
- Cap at 3 searches per objective
Step 3: Compute Progress Dashboard
For each objective, determine status:
- On track — progress scores advancing, no overdue key results
- At risk — some key results stalled or behind expected pace
- Behind — multiple key results with no progress, approaching deadlines missed
Display:
# Goals Review — [Date]
Quarter: [quarter] | Push level: [level] | Next review: [date]
────────────────────
## 1. [Objective name] (weight: [N]%)
Status: [ON TRACK / AT RISK / BEHIND]
Key Results:
a) [description] ............ [progress] → [suggested update]
Evidence: [1-line summary of what was found]
b) [description] ............ [progress] → [suggested update]
Evidence: [1-line summary]
────────────────────
## 2. [Next objective...]
...
────────────────────
## Upcoming Deadlines (next 30 days)
- [date]: [description] (objective: [name])
- ...
[If none: "No deadlines in the next 30 days"]
## Stalled Areas
- [Any key result with 0.0 progress for 2+ review cycles]
## Recommendation
[1-2 sentences on what to focus on this fortnight]Step 4: Interactive Update (skip if status or deadlines argument)
For each objective, ask:
- "Update progress for [key result]? Current: [score]. Enter new score (0.0-1.0) or press Enter to keep."
- "Any deadlines to add for the next 30 days?"
- "Should push_level change? Current: [level]"
After the user provides updates, write the updated goals.yaml file.
Step 5: Set Next Review
Update next_review in goals.yaml to 14 days from today.
Check if a biweekly reminder exists. If not, suggest: "Create a recurring biweekly reminder 'Run /goals-review with Claude'?"
Step 6: Log Performance
echo "$(date +%Y-%m-%d),goals-review,TOOL_CALLS,NOTES" >> ~/.claude-assistant/logs/skill-performance.csvReplace TOOL_CALLS with approximate count and NOTES with brief summary.
Error Handling
- Granola unavailable: Skip meeting evidence, note "Granola unavailable"
- Gmail unavailable: Skip email evidence, note "Gmail unavailable"
- osascript fails: Skip reminder evidence
- goals.yaml missing: Prompt user to create from template
Integration Notes
- Manages the
goals.yamlfile that/checkinand/morning-briefread for goal alignment. Keep it updated here, and those skills automatically benefit. - Run biweekly to keep progress scores current. Set up a recurring reminder.
- Push level affects how aggressively
/checkinand/morning-briefnudge about calendar alignment and deep work time.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

