agentleFS
kreuzberg-devkreuzberg-dev/tree-sitter-language-pack/skills/tree-sitter-language-pack-extracting-code-structure/SKILL.md

tree-sitter-language-pack-extracting-code-structure

Skill480 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user wants structured code metadata from a source file — functions, classes, imports, exports, symbols, docstrings, comments, or syntax diagnostics. Covers `ts-pack process` feature flags, the JSON result shape, and the default feature set.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When no feature flags are given, process defaults to --structure --imports --exports.

    line 33
  2. Very specific:

    If the user wants the raw syntax tree rather than extracted metadata, use ts-pack parse — see the tree-sitter-language-pack-parsing-source …

    line 133

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- AI-RULEZ :: GENERATED FILE — DO NOT EDIT Content-Hash: blake3:134c19e688f04cc2315c2ffa5fc4c6a567c9166258bc1cc5b1f19f4acfcbddb7 Source-Hash: blake3:e63d5809d1494bcfc9e4a67ba9975f7ed86cda4b3d2bdf85b0c483f0c5ddfcb0 Schema-Version: v1 -->

Extracting code structure

ts-pack process <file> runs the code-intelligence pipeline over a source file and prints JSON. Use it when the user wants structured metadata — "list the functions", "what does this file import", "find the exported symbols", "pull the docstrings" — rather than a raw syntax tree.

Quick recipe

# Default features: structure + imports + exports
ts-pack process src/app.ts

# Pick features explicitly (only what you ask for is computed)
ts-pack process src/app.ts --structure --imports --symbols --docstrings

# Everything
ts-pack process src/app.ts --all

When no feature flags are given, process defaults to --structure --imports --exports. Passing any single extraction flag (--structure --imports --exports --comments --docstrings --symbols --diagnostics) turns off that default set, so list every feature you want. --chunk-size and --language are modifiers, not extraction flags: they do not disable the defaults (e.g. --chunk-size 500 alone still emits structure+imports+exports and adds chunks).

Feature flags

FlagExtracts
--structureFunctions, classes, methods, modules (spans, nesting, visibility).
--importsImport statements and their sources.
--exportsExported symbols and their kinds.
--commentsInline and block comments.
--docstringsDocstrings attached to definitions.
--symbolsAll identifiers (for search/indexing).
--diagnosticsSyntax errors and error nodes with positions.
--allEnable every feature above.
--chunk-size <bytes>Syntax-aware chunks — see tree-sitter-language-pack-chunking-for-llms.
--language <name> (-l)Override language (auto-detected from extension otherwise).

Result shape

process always prints JSON. Top-level keys:

{
  "language": "python",
  "metrics": { "total_lines": 0, "code_lines": 0, "comment_lines": 0, "blank_lines": 0, "total_bytes": 0, "node_count": 0, "error_count": 0, "max_depth": 0 },
  "structure": [],
  "imports": [],
  "exports": [],
  "comments": [],
  "docstrings": [],
  "symbols": [],
  "diagnostics": [],
  "chunks": []
}

metrics is populated whenever any processing runs. chunks appears only when --chunk-size is set. Empty collections are omitted from the JSON (the skip_serializing_if wire contract), so absent keys mean "nothing found", not an error.

Structure items

Each structure entry has kind (a capitalized string — "Function", "Class", "Method", "Module", "Struct", "Trait", …; language-specific kinds serialize as {"Other": "<kind>"}), name, visibility, and a nested span object with start_byte/end_byte and zero-indexed start_line/start_column/end_line/end_column. Nesting is expressed via children (e.g. methods inside a class), not a parent pointer. Optional fields: decorators, doc_comment (the attached doc comment), signature, and body_span.

Examples

# Function and class names with line numbers
ts-pack process src/service.py --structure \
  | jq '.structure[] | {kind, name, line: .span.start_line}'

# Import sources only
ts-pack process src/app.ts --imports \
  | jq '.imports[].source'

# Syntax error count (also available via metrics.error_count)
ts-pack process broken.go --diagnostics \
  | jq '.diagnostics | length'

# Build a symbol index across a tree of files
for f in $(git ls-files '*.rs'); do
  ts-pack process "$f" --symbols | jq -c --arg f "$f" '{file: $f, symbols: .symbols}'
done

SDK equivalent

from tree_sitter_language_pack import process, ProcessConfig

# ProcessConfig is a frozen dataclass — set fields in the constructor.
# structure/imports/exports default to True; add the rest you want.
config = ProcessConfig("python", symbols=True, docstrings=True)
result = process(source_code, config)
for item in result.structure:                 # ProcessResult is an object, not a dict
    print(item.kind, item.name, item.span.start_line)

The SDK also exposes the parsed tree (get_parser(...) → Parser/Tree/ Node) for running your own tree-sitter queries, and a data_extraction config flag that pulls a hierarchical key/value tree from data-format files (JSON, YAML, TOML, …) into the result's data field — neither is exposed on the CLI.

When to reach for parse instead

If the user wants the raw syntax tree rather than extracted metadata, use ts-pack parse — see the tree-sitter-language-pack-parsing-source skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.