agentleFS
kreuzberg-devkreuzberg-dev/tree-sitter-language-pack/skills/tree-sitter-language-pack-chunking-for-llms/SKILL.md

tree-sitter-language-pack-chunking-for-llms

Skill480 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user wants to split source code into chunks for an LLM context window without breaking syntax mid-construct. Covers `ts-pack process --chunk-size`, why syntax-aware splits beat fixed-byte splits, picking a size, and the chunk JSON shape.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Leave headroom for the prompt, the surrounding messages, and the response — do not size chunks to the full context window.

    line 37

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- AI-RULEZ :: GENERATED FILE — DO NOT EDIT Content-Hash: blake3:f73428c23ccd047c1e8d74065c6be1dcc21b97f1f3e235ebc2a6779317208188 Source-Hash: blake3:e63d5809d1494bcfc9e4a67ba9975f7ed86cda4b3d2bdf85b0c483f0c5ddfcb0 Schema-Version: v1 -->

Syntax-aware chunking for LLMs

Splitting code on a fixed byte or line count cuts functions in half and strips context. ts-pack process <file> --chunk-size <bytes> splits on syntactic boundaries (whole functions, classes, blocks) so each chunk is a coherent unit, and emits them in the JSON chunks array.

Quick recipe

# ~2 KB chunks aligned to syntax boundaries
ts-pack process src/app.ts --chunk-size 2000

--chunk-size is a maximum size in bytes. The splitter packs whole syntactic units up to that bound; an oversized single construct becomes its own chunk rather than being cut. Chunks are added to the normal process JSON output under chunks.

Picking a size

  • Match the downstream model's token budget. A rough rule: bytes ÷ 4 ≈ tokens for code, so --chunk-size 4000 is on the order of ~1k tokens.
  • Larger chunks preserve more local context but fit fewer per request.
  • Leave headroom for the prompt, the surrounding messages, and the response — do not size chunks to the full context window.

Combining with extraction

Chunking composes with the other process features, so you can attach structure metadata to each request:

ts-pack process src/service.py --structure --chunk-size 3000 \
  | jq '{chunks: (.chunks | length), functions: (.structure | length)}'

Chunk output

chunks is a list of code-chunk objects in the process JSON. Each chunk carries its source text plus span information (line/byte offsets), so you can cite or re-locate a chunk back in the original file. Iterate the array to feed an LLM one coherent unit at a time:

ts-pack process big_module.py --chunk-size 2500 \
  | jq -c '.chunks[]'

SDK equivalent

The SDK exposes chunking through the process config: set the chunk_max_size field (in bytes) on ProcessConfig — the same value the CLI's --chunk-size flag sets. ProcessConfig is a frozen dataclass, so pass it to the constructor:

from tree_sitter_language_pack import process, ProcessConfig

config = ProcessConfig("python", chunk_max_size=2500)
result = process(source_code, config)
for chunk in result.chunks:          # ProcessResult is an object, not a dict
    send_to_llm(chunk.content)

When not to chunk

For a single small file that already fits the context window, skip chunking and pass the file whole. Reach for chunking when a file is large, when you are batching many files into a RAG index, or when you need stable, syntactically coherent units to cite.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.