ontology
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Typed knowledge graph for structured agent memory and composable skills. Use when creating/querying entities (Person, Project, Task, Event, Document), linking related objects, enforcing constraints, planning multi-step actions as graph transformations, or when skills need to share state. Trigger on "remember", "what do I know about", "link X to Y", "show dependencies", entity CRUD, or cross-skill data access.
9 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Elong-svg/business-plan-factoryedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jaccen/Awesome-Gaussian-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- modeled-information-format/mnemonictheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ForceInjection/awesome-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- osick/ctx.skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- stevemarksava/superteamtheir own version, first seen Sep 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use find-skills.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillfind-skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- ForceInjection/awesome-skills★ 87100% same
- bushuhui/skills★ 2100% same
Edited · 2
- Elong-svg/business-plan-factory★ 299% same
- zinan92/skills-repo★ 199% same
Wrote their own version · 5
- jaccen/Awesome-Gaussian-Skills★ 180same name
- 01clauding/claude-ontology-skill★ 34same name
- modeled-information-format/mnemonic★ 23same name
- stevemarksava/superteam★ 1same name
- osick/ctx.skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository79 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ad-first-marketingSkill
- afrexai-community-growth-engineSkill
- agent-fleet-statusSkill
- agentgramSkill
- ai-cold-emailSkill
- answeroverflowSkill
- answeroverflowSkill
- api-gatewaySkill
- apple-notesSkill
- autonomous-operatorSkill
- autonomous-revenueSkill
- brand-analyzerSkill
- brand-identitySkill
- brand-operatorSkill
- browser-useSkill
- byteroverSkill
- calendlySkill
- clawdcursorSkill
- clawd-provisionerSkill
- client-acquisitionSkill
- cold-email-writerSkill
- cold-outreachSkill
- Community ManagerSkill
- community-mod-packSkill
- competitive-ads-extractorSkill
- competitor-analyzerSkill
- content-engineSkill
- content-qa-scorerSkill
- content-repurposeSkill
- cron-automatorSkill
- daily-brief-generatorSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- elite-longterm-memorySkill
- email-responderSkill
- fathom-tele-tvSkill
- fleet-commanderSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gogSkill
- himalayaSkill
- imsgSkill
- internet-marketingSkill
- klaviyoSkill
- knowledge-extractorSkill
- koino-frontendSkill
- lead-research-assistantSkill
- lead-scorerSkill
- macos-calendarSkill
- marketing-drafterSkill
- marketingSkill
- marketing-strategy-pmmSkill
- master-marketingSkill
- meeting-prepSkill
- moltbookSkill
- moltguardSkill
- objection-destroyerSkill
- pipeline-autopilotSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- proactive-agentSkill
- proposal-generatorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 77
When working with existing ontology data or schema, append/merge changes instead of overwriting files.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ontology
A typed vocabulary + constraint system for representing knowledge as a verifiable graph.
Core Concept
Everything is an entity with a type, properties, and relations to other entities. Every mutation is validated against type constraints before committing.
Entity: { id, type, properties, relations, created, updated }
Relation: { from_id, relation_type, to_id, properties }When to Use
| Trigger | Action |
| "Remember that..." | Create/update entity |
| "What do I know about X?" | Query graph |
| "Link X to Y" | Create relation |
| "Show all tasks for project Z" | Graph traversal |
| "What depends on X?" | Dependency query |
| Planning multi-step work | Model as graph transformations |
| Skill needs shared state | Read/write ontology objects |
Core Types
# Agents & People
Person: { name, email?, phone?, notes? }
Organization: { name, type?, members[] }
# Work
Project: { name, status, goals[], owner? }
Task: { title, status, due?, priority?, assignee?, blockers[] }
Goal: { description, target_date?, metrics[] }
# Time & Place
Event: { title, start, end?, location?, attendees[], recurrence? }
Location: { name, address?, coordinates? }
# Information
Document: { title, path?, url?, summary? }
Message: { content, sender, recipients[], thread? }
Thread: { subject, participants[], messages[] }
Note: { content, tags[], refs[] }
# Resources
Account: { service, username, credential_ref? }
Device: { name, type, identifiers[] }
Credential: { service, secret_ref } # Never store secrets directly
# Meta
Action: { type, target, timestamp, outcome? }
Policy: { scope, rule, enforcement }Storage
Default: memory/ontology/graph.jsonl
{"op":"create","entity":{"id":"p_001","type":"Person","properties":{"name":"Alice"}}}
{"op":"create","entity":{"id":"proj_001","type":"Project","properties":{"name":"Website Redesign","status":"active"}}}
{"op":"relate","from":"proj_001","rel":"has_owner","to":"p_001"}Query via scripts or direct file ops. For complex graphs, migrate to SQLite.
Append-Only Rule
When working with existing ontology data or schema, append/merge changes instead of overwriting files. This preserves history and avoids clobbering prior definitions.
Workflows
Create Entity
python3 scripts/ontology.py create --type Person --props '{"name":"Alice","email":"alice@example.com"}'Query
python3 scripts/ontology.py query --type Task --where '{"status":"open"}'
python3 scripts/ontology.py get --id task_001
python3 scripts/ontology.py related --id proj_001 --rel has_taskLink Entities
python3 scripts/ontology.py relate --from proj_001 --rel has_task --to task_001Validate
python3 scripts/ontology.py validate # Check all constraintsConstraints
Define in memory/ontology/schema.yaml:
types:
Task:
required: [title, status]
status_enum: [open, in_progress, blocked, done]
Event:
required: [title, start]
validate: "end >= start if end exists"
Credential:
required: [service, secret_ref]
forbidden_properties: [password, secret, token] # Force indirection
relations:
has_owner:
from_types: [Project, Task]
to_types: [Person]
cardinality: many_to_one
blocks:
from_types: [Task]
to_types: [Task]
acyclic: true # No circular dependenciesSkill Contract
Skills that use ontology should declare:
# In SKILL.md frontmatter or header
ontology:
reads: [Task, Project, Person]
writes: [Task, Action]
preconditions:
- "Task.assignee must exist"
postconditions:
- "Created Task has status=open"Planning as Graph Transformation
Model multi-step plans as a sequence of graph operations:
Plan: "Schedule team meeting and create follow-up tasks"
1. CREATE Event { title: "Team Sync", attendees: [p_001, p_002] }
2. RELATE Event -> has_project -> proj_001
3. CREATE Task { title: "Prepare agenda", assignee: p_001 }
4. RELATE Task -> for_event -> event_001
5. CREATE Task { title: "Send summary", assignee: p_001, blockers: [task_001] }Each step is validated before execution. Rollback on constraint violation.
Integration Patterns
With Causal Inference
Log ontology mutations as causal actions:
# When creating/updating entities, also log to causal action log
action = {
"action": "create_entity",
"domain": "ontology",
"context": {"type": "Task", "project": "proj_001"},
"outcome": "created"
}Cross-Skill Communication
# Email skill creates commitment
commitment = ontology.create("Commitment", {
"source_message": msg_id,
"description": "Send report by Friday",
"due": "2026-01-31"
})
# Task skill picks it up
tasks = ontology.query("Commitment", {"status": "pending"})
for c in tasks:
ontology.create("Task", {
"title": c.description,
"due": c.due,
"source": c.id
})Quick Start
# Initialize ontology storage
mkdir -p memory/ontology
touch memory/ontology/graph.jsonl
# Create schema (optional but recommended)
python3 scripts/ontology.py schema-append --data '{
"types": {
"Task": { "required": ["title", "status"] },
"Project": { "required": ["name"] },
"Person": { "required": ["name"] }
}
}'
# Start using
python3 scripts/ontology.py create --type Person --props '{"name":"Alice"}'
python3 scripts/ontology.py list --type PersonReferences
references/schema.md— Full type definitions and constraint patternsreferences/queries.md— Query language and traversal examples
Instruction Scope
Runtime instructions operate on local files (memory/ontology/graph.jsonl and memory/ontology/schema.yaml) and provide CLI usage for create/query/relate/validate; this is within scope. The skill reads/writes workspace files and will create the memory/ontology directory when used. Validation includes property/enum/forbidden checks, relation type/cardinality validation, acyclicity for relations marked acyclic: true, and Event end >= start checks; other higher-level constraints may still be documentation-only unless implemented in code.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

