update-plan
Skill9 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Updates an existing implementation plan based on new information discovered during development. Merges the user's current plan with new findings (edge cases, API changes, scope changes, discovered dependencies) and outputs an updated plan, then copies it to the clipboard. Use this skill when the user says "update the plan", "revise the plan", "plan changed", "found a new edge case", "the approach needs to change", "replan", "adjust TODO", or pastes an existing plan and describes what changed. Also trigger when the user reports implementation surprises, blockers, or scope adjustments that affect the plan.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- sikbrad/spark-harness-templatetheir own version, first seen Jul 25, 2026
- kimgoetzke/coding-agent-configstheir own version, first seen Apr 30, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skills★ 60same name
- kimgoetzke/coding-agent-configs★ 2same name
- sikbrad/spark-harness-template★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- clear-command-driven-devSkill
- create-planSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
Before doing anything else, enter Plan Mode (use the EnterPlanMode tool if you are not already in it).
- Very specific: line 34
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the description of what changed.
- Distinctive: line 35
If empty, use the conversation context to understand the changes.
- Distinctive: line 36
If neither provides enough detail, ask the user what changed.
- Distinctive: line 43
If the current plan is not provided in the conversation or arguments, ask the user to choose:
- Distinctive: line 83
Before the full plan, provide a brief summary of what changed:
- Distinctive: line 107
If the script exits non-zero (no clipboard tool available), output the plan in a single fenced code block so the user can copy it manually.
- Very specific: line 115
Do not alter completed [x] items unless the user explicitly asks
- Distinctive: line 116
When splitting a TODO, preserve the original intent and add sub-tasks.
- Distinctive: line 118
If the change invalidates a decision table row, update it — don't just add rows.
- Distinctive: line 119
Keep conditions as yes/no questions and re-check that every combination is covered
- Distinctive: line 120
If the user provides only partial plan text, ask for the missing sections before generating the update (or note assumptions clearly)
- Distinctive: line 122
Keep the same format as the original plan — consistency matters for the workflow
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Update Plan
Revise an existing plan based on new information and copy the updated version to the clipboard.
IMPORTANT: Enter Plan Mode first
Before doing anything else, enter Plan Mode (use the EnterPlanMode tool if
you are not already in it). Do not write or modify any code.
Plan Mode allows you to explore the codebase read-only and revise the plan
without making changes.
Process
Step 1: Receive the Current Plan and Changes
What changed: $ARGUMENTS
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the description of what changed.
If empty, use the conversation context to understand the changes.
If neither provides enough detail, ask the user what changed.
The user provides:
- The current plan — pasted from their notes (full or partial)
- What changed — described in natural language
If the current plan is not provided in the conversation or arguments, ask the user to choose:
- Paste the current plan
- Infer from conversation context
Common types of changes:
| Change Type | Example |
| New edge case | "The API returns 404 when the resource is soft-deleted, we need to handle this" |
| Scope adjustment | "We decided not to implement restore for v1" |
| Approach change | "The ORM doesn't support bulk upsert, need to use raw SQL" |
| New dependency | "This requires a migration to add the deleted_at column first" |
| Task splitting | "The repository TODO is too large, needs to be split" (split by feature within the layer) |
| PR splitting | "PR 2 is too big to review" (split by behavior into PR 2 and PR 3, renumber later PRs) |
| Completed items | "I finished the domain and repository tasks" |
| Criteria change | "Restore should also work on items deleted by an admin" |
Step 2: Generate the Updated Plan
Apply the changes to the plan while following these rules:
- Preserve completed items — Keep
[x]items as-is for history - Mark removed items — Use
strikethroughwith a reason, don't silently delete - Add new items at the correct dependency position — not just appended at the end
- Update What — if the goal or scope fundamentally changed, revise it
- Update the decision tables — if edge cases changed, update the table in the affected TODO's "Done when" (or the shared table, if several TODOs follow it)
- Update references — add new files, PRs, or documents discovered during work
- Update requirements — if the specifications or constraints changed
- Keep "Done when" and "Verify" in sync — when a TODO's approach or scope changes, update its "Done when" and "Verify". When a shared decision table row is added, removed, or renumbered, update every open TODO that cites it. New TODOs need both fields
Output the full updated plan following the same five-section format.
The format specification is shared with create-plan; read it at
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../create-plan/references/plan-format.md.
Step 3: Show the Diff Summary
Before the full plan, provide a brief summary of what changed:
### Plan Changes
- Added: <new TODO items or sections>
- Modified: <changed approach or scope>
- Removed: <items no longer needed, with reason>
- Reordered: <dependency changes>This helps the user quickly verify the update matches their intent.
Step 4: Copy to Clipboard
Copy the updated plan (without the diff summary) to the clipboard with the clipboard script bundled in create-plan:
"${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../create-plan/scripts/copy-to-clipboard.sh" <<'PLAN_EOF'
<the updated plan>
PLAN_EOFIf the script exits non-zero (no clipboard tool available), output the plan in a single fenced code block so the user can copy it manually.
Inform the user the updated plan is on their clipboard so they can replace the old version in their notes.
Guidelines
- Do not alter completed
[x]items unless the user explicitly asks - When splitting a TODO, preserve the original intent and add sub-tasks; divide the original "Done when" between them so no criterion is lost
- If the change invalidates a decision table row, update it — don't just add rows. Keep conditions as yes/no questions and re-check that every combination is covered
- If the user provides only partial plan text, ask for the missing sections before generating the update (or note assumptions clearly)
- Keep the same format as the original plan — consistency matters for the workflow
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

