create-plan
Skill9 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Creates a structured implementation plan in Plan Mode and copies it to the clipboard. The plan follows a five-section format: What (goal/purpose), Requirements, TODO (PRs split into layer TODOs such as DDL, domain, repository, each with acceptance criteria and a verification step), References, and Verification (end-to-end check and test commands). Use this skill when the user asks to "plan a feature", "create a plan", "start planning", "break down a task", "create TODO", "plan mode output", or wants to structure implementation work before coding. After generating the plan, it is automatically copied to the clipboard so the user can paste it into their preferred note-taking app.
39 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- artberri/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Pubx-ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodaltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- fnayou/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- mhylle/claude-skills-collectiontheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use codebase-migrate, support-ticket-triage and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ComposioHQSkillcodebase-migrate
Run large codebase migrations and multi-file refactors. Uses the Composio CLI to coordinate issue tracking, batched PRs, and CI verification while the agent executes the transforms locally across hundreds of files.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ComposioHQSkillsupport-ticket-triage
Triage customer support tickets/emails/chats into categories, priority, and next action; draft responses and create reproducible steps; use for Zendesk/Intercom/Help Scout exports or pasted threads.
Also in 5 projects that use this
corticalstackSkilliterate-plan
Revise an existing implementation plan in flow/plans/ based on feedback, researching when needed. Explicit-only; run only when invoked via /iterate-plan or explicitly asked.
Also in 4 projects that use this
hebertzhuSkilldevelop-web-game
Use when building or iterating on a web game and you need a tight implement-test-observe loop; prefer the bundled Playwright client, inspect screenshots and text state, and validate every meaningful change before moving on.
Also in 3 projects that use this
petestewartSkilldatadog-logs
Query Datadog logs via the Logs Search API v2. Use when the user asks to "check the logs", "search logs", "find errors in Datadog", "look up logs for", "show me production logs", "check for errors", "search Datadog", or any request involving log search, error investigation, or production debugging that requires Datadog log data.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from ComposioHQ
Other versions39 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 39
- ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills★ 17ksame name
- composio-community/awesome-codex-skills★ 16ksame name
- netease-youdao/LobsterAI★ 6.2ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
- freestylefly/wesight★ 969same name
- gittower/git-flow-next★ 458same name
- JetBrains/youtrackdb★ 443same name
- OpenFn/lightning★ 321same name
- dannys-code-corner/incan★ 73same name
- DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skills★ 60same name
29 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- clear-command-driven-devSkill
- update-planSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
24 rules. 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 37 edited versions we read keep these.
19
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Before doing anything else, enter Plan Mode (use the EnterPlanMode tool if you are not already in it).
- Very specific: line 31
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the initial task description.
- Distinctive: line 32
If empty, ask the user what feature or task to plan.
- Distinctive: line 33
Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a clear task description.
- Very specific: line 37
Use AskUserQuestion to deepen your understanding of the task through natural conversation.
- Distinctive: line 38
Do not follow a fixed checklist — adapt your questions based on what the user has already told you and what you still need to know to …
- Distinctive: line 46
What is ambiguous?: If the task description leaves room for interpretation, ask about the intended behavior or expected output.
- Distinctive: line 51
What does the user know that you don't?: Ask about business context, prior attempts, team conventions, or constraints that aren't visible …
- Distinctive: line 59
Ask two or three questions at a time.
- Distinctive: line 63
If the user's answer reveals a new area of complexity, follow up on it before moving to the next topic.
- Distinctive: line 65
Do not move on by yourself.
- Distinctive: line 78
Create one agent per area, each with a focused responsibility
- Very specific: line 82
Use WebSearch / WebFetch in agents that need to research external documentation
- Distinctive: line 94
Always include identifying the project's layers (directories, dependency direction, where migrations live) in one agent's scope — the TODO …
- Distinctive: line 108
Wait for all agents to complete before proceeding to Phase 4.
- Distinctive: line 117
Start with What — clarify the goal and why it matters before diving into details
- Distinctive: line 122
Never mix DDL with application code in one TODO
- Distinctive: line 127
Write each "Done when" at that layer's boundary.
- Very specific: line 130
When a TODO has conditional logic, write its "Done when" as a decision table scoped to that TODO, with every condition as a yes/no question …
- Distinctive: line 139
After the user confirms the plan, pipe it to the bundled clipboard script, which detects the platform (macOS, WSL, Wayland, X11):
- Distinctive: line 148
If the script exits non-zero (no clipboard tool available), output the plan in a single fenced code block so the user can copy it manually.
- Distinctive: line 156
Write TODO items as imperative actions: "Add field X to struct Y", not "Field X should be added"
- Distinctive: line 161
Do not copy a table into several TODOs — if more than one TODO needs it, make it shared
- Distinctive: line 163
Every shared decision table row should be cited by at least one TODO's "Done when".
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 37 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Plan
Generate a structured implementation plan and copy it to the clipboard.
IMPORTANT: Enter Plan Mode first
Before doing anything else, enter Plan Mode (use the EnterPlanMode tool if
you are not already in it). Do not write or modify any code.
Plan Mode allows you to explore the codebase read-only and design the plan
without making changes.
Phase 1: Receive Task
The user's request: $ARGUMENTS
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the initial task description.
If empty, ask the user what feature or task to plan.
Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a clear task description.
Phase 2: Clarify Requirements
Use AskUserQuestion to deepen your understanding of the task through natural conversation.
Do not follow a fixed checklist — adapt your questions based on what the user has already
told you and what you still need to know to generate actionable TODO items.
What you need to know (not a script to follow)
Your goal is to gather enough context so that each TODO item you generate later is unambiguous and independently implementable. Work backward from that goal:
- What is ambiguous? If the task description leaves room for interpretation, ask about the intended behavior or expected output.
- What decisions haven't been made? Surface implicit choices the user may not have considered (e.g., "Should this be synchronous or async?", "Do we need backward compatibility?").
- What does the user know that you don't? Ask about business context, prior attempts, team conventions, or constraints that aren't visible in the codebase.
- What would block implementation? Identify unknowns that would force you to stop mid-task and ask (e.g., "Which API endpoint should this call?", "What happens when X fails?").
How to ask
- Ask two or three questions at a time. Do not overwhelm the user.
- Frame questions as concrete choices or scenarios when possible (e.g., "When the token expires, should we retry silently or show an error to the user?") rather than open-ended ("What about error handling?").
- If the user's answer reveals a new area of complexity, follow up on it before moving to the next topic.
- Do not move on by yourself. When you believe you have enough information, summarize what you understood and ask the user to confirm before proceeding: "Here is my understanding so far: ... Shall we move on to research, or is there anything else to clarify?"
Phase 3: Research (Parallel Subagents)
Based on the task and requirements clarified in Phase 1-2, design and launch subagents tailored to the specific research needs. Do not use a fixed set of agents — decide what research is needed for this particular task.
How to design agents
- Identify the distinct areas of research needed (codebase, external docs, dependencies, etc.)
- Create one agent per area, each with a focused responsibility
- Choose the appropriate subagent_type for each:
Explore— for codebase exploration (file structure, existing code, patterns)Plan— for analysis (dependencies, impact, implementation order)- Use
WebSearch/WebFetchin agents that need to research external documentation
- Launch all agents in parallel using the Agent tool
- Pass each agent a summary of the task and clarified requirements
Examples
Example: Adding a new domain to CDN via GCS
- Agent 1 (Explore): Search Terraform codebase for existing domain/bucket configurations
- Agent 2 (Explore + WebSearch): Research Fastly CDN configuration and official docs
- Agent 3 (Explore): Investigate GCS bucket setup patterns in the codebase
- Agent 4 (Plan): Analyze DNS, SSL, and deployment dependencies
Always include identifying the project's layers (directories, dependency direction, where migrations live) in one agent's scope — the TODO section is split by those layers.
Example: Adding a REST API endpoint
- Agent 1 (Explore): Find existing API endpoint patterns, conventions, and the project's layer structure
- Agent 2 (Explore): Investigate DB schema and repository layer
- Agent 3 (Explore): Search for related test patterns and fixtures
Example: Refactoring authentication middleware
- Agent 1 (Explore): Map all usage of current auth middleware across the codebase
- Agent 2 (Plan): Analyze breaking changes and migration path
- Agent 3 (Explore + WebSearch): Research the target auth library's official docs
Wait for all agents to complete before proceeding to Phase 4.
Phase 4: Present Draft Plan
Synthesize the results from all subagents and the clarified requirements to generate a draft plan. Read references/plan-format.md first — it is the complete format specification with examples.
Key points:
- Start with What — clarify the goal and why it matters before diving into details
- Group TODOs into PRs (
### PR <n>: <scope>: <one-line purpose>), each one reviewable purpose that merges and deploys on its own, numbered in dependency order - Inside each PR, split TODOs by layer, one layer per TODO, using the layers found in the codebase; order the layer headings by dependency (e.g. DDL → domain → repository → usecase → handler)
- Never mix DDL with application code in one TODO
- Order tasks by dependency (upstream tasks first)
- Each TODO must be completable in a single Claude Code session
- Give every TODO a "Done when" (observable behavior the reviewer checks) and a "Verify" (the command or check the implementing session runs)
- Write each "Done when" at that layer's boundary; if even that is impossible, merge the TODO into the one in the same layer that first uses it
- Include code examples for non-trivial logic
- When a TODO has conditional logic, write its "Done when" as a decision table
scoped to that TODO, with every condition as a yes/no question (
Y/N/-); use a shared table under Verification only for rules several TODOs must follow - List all relevant files, PRs, and documents in References
Present the draft to the user and ask for confirmation or changes.
Phase 5: Finalize and Copy to Clipboard
After the user confirms the plan, pipe it to the bundled clipboard script, which detects the platform (macOS, WSL, Wayland, X11):
"${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/copy-to-clipboard.sh" <<'PLAN_EOF'
<the confirmed plan>
PLAN_EOFIf the script exits non-zero (no clipboard tool available), output the plan in a single fenced code block so the user can copy it manually.
Inform the user that the plan has been copied to their clipboard so they can paste it into their preferred note-taking app.
Guidelines
- Write TODO items as imperative actions: "Add field X to struct Y", not "Field X should be added"
- Target file paths should be explicit:
src/repository/item_repository.ts, not "the item repository" - Code examples in TODOs should be minimal but sufficient to convey the approach
- Decision tables cover every yes/no combination exactly once, use
-for "don't care", and give each question an exact threshold (no "a few minutes") - Do not copy a table into several TODOs — if more than one TODO needs it, make it shared
- "Done when" states behavior, never "tests pass" or a restatement of the task
- Every shared decision table row should be cited by at least one TODO's "Done when"; an uncited row means a TODO is missing
- References should include the reason each resource is relevant
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

