transcript-to-actions
Skill8 starsChanged 45 days agoCC-BY-SA-4.0View on GitHub
Turns one meeting transcript or recap into a DRAFT action-items document (decisions, owned and dated action items with verbatim source quotes, open questions), a task list ready for the user to enter into their task tracker, and one DRAFT follow-up email per action owner, all returned in the chat for the user to store, create or send. Use when the user shares, names or points to a meeting transcript or recap and asks to "pull the action items from this transcript", "who owns what after today's call", "draft follow-up emails to each owner" or "turn this recap into tasks". Do not use for full minutes, use meeting-minutes-writer instead; a brief before a meeting is meeting-prep-onepager. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 3 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 3
- kesslernity/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills★ 4018% same
- Yugpat1835/awesome-copilot-cowork-skills★ 618% same
- kesslernity/awesome-mistral-vibe-skills★ 1100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository136 other files it gives its agents.
- customer-feedback-theme-synthesisSkill
- escalation-summarySkill
- ticket-triage-packSkill
- commitment-catcherSkill
- custom-daily-briefSkill
- project-dashboard-builderSkill
- data-dictionary-builderSkill
- data-quality-issue-logSkill
- dataset-insight-packSkill
- kpi-definition-sheetSkill
- document-deidentification-passSkill
- dpia-draft-packSkill
- inbox-triageSkill
- interface-register-builderSkill
- management-of-change-intakeSkill
- master-document-register-checkSkill
- transmittal-drafterSkill
- instrumentation-and-control-enrichmentSkill
- pfd-intake-and-extractionSkill
- pid-tool-readiness-mappingSkill
- piping-enrichmentSkill
- process-model-checkSkill
- process-safety-flagsSkill
- tagging-and-numberingSkill
- validation-and-review-packageSkill
- architecture-decision-recordSkill
- board-paper-skeletonSkill
- decision-memo-builderSkill
- executive-briefing-packSkill
- cbo-reviewerSkill
- cdo-reviewerSkill
- cfo-reviewerSkill
- chro-reviewerSkill
- ciso-reviewerSkill
- cmo-reviewerSkill
- coo-reviewerSkill
- cpo-reviewerSkill
- cro-reviewerSkill
- cto-reviewerSkill
- customer-advocate-reviewerSkill
- frontline-skeptic-reviewerSkill
- general-counsel-reviewerSkill
- investor-reviewerSkill
- procurement-reviewerSkill
- works-council-reviewerSkill
- budget-variance-explainerSkill
- capex-request-packSkill
- cash-forecast-assumptions-sheetSkill
- expense-policy-precheckSkill
- invoice-exception-reviewSkill
- month-end-close-checklistSkill
- change-communication-planSkill
- exit-interview-synthesisSkill
- impact-log-builderSkill
- interview-scorecard-builderSkill
- job-description-drafterSkill
- onboarding-plan-builderSkill
- performance-review-drafterSkill
- policy-change-briefingSkill
- policy-question-answererSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

