triage-validate-finding
Skill2 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
Dynamically reproduces finding candidates with authorization and writes validated findings for the Defense Factory Dynamic validation phase. Static-only results stay candidates; refuse unauthorized Red testing.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Never use to attack unauthorized systems
- Very specific: line 33
Cannot reproduce: leave as candidate; document attempts in a sibling .md file—do not mark validated
- Very specific: line 34
Write validated file to .defense-factory/findings/validated/<id>.json.
- Distinctive: line 52
Do not expand into unrelated offensive tooling development.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
triage-validate-finding
Phase: Dynamic validation
Style: Blue triage + authorized Red reproduction only
When to use
- Candidates exist under
.defense-factory/findings/candidates/ - User requests confirmation before ownership or fix work
- Never use to attack unauthorized systems
Preconditions
- Explicit ownership or written authorization referenced in SECURITY.md or a ticket id.
- Safe environment for reproduction (prefer staging/lab over production).
- Candidate JSON files present and schema-valid.
Procedure
- Load candidate; confirm
asset_idis in-scope. - Record
authorization_ref(SECURITY.md section + ticket/email id). - Attempt minimal dynamic reproduction sufficient to prove impact:
- Authorized requests, config checks, or controlled exploit replay against owned/authorized targets only
- Capture redacted request/response or logs under
.defense-factory/findings/validated/<id>/
- Decision:
- Validated: set
statustovalidated,evidence.dynamictotrue, includereproduction_steps,observed_behavior,expected_behavior,proof_artifacts,authorization_ref - False positive: set
statustofalse_positivewith short rationale; keep under candidates or move tofindings/duplicates/with note - Cannot reproduce: leave as candidate; document attempts in a sibling
.mdfile—do not mark validated
- Validated: set
- Write validated file to
.defense-factory/findings/validated/<id>.json. - Validate:
python <skills-repo>\scripts\validate_artifacts.py .defense-factory\findings\validated\<id>.json --schema findingRequired outputs
| Path | Rule |
.defense-factory/findings/validated/<id>.json | Must include dynamic evidence |
.defense-factory/findings/validated/<id>/* | Redacted proof artifacts |
Stop / refuse
- Refuse reproduction against systems lacking ownership or written authorization.
- Refuse to mark validated when only static analyzer output exists.
- Do not expand into unrelated offensive tooling development.
Next phase
dedupe-findings, then route-ownership.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- build-inventorySkill
- dedupe-findingsSkill
- define-security-policySkill
- fix-findingSkill
- route-ownershipSkill
- security-diff-scanSkill
- security-scanSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- verify-fixSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

