subagent-dev
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute independent tasks in parallel using subagents — dispatch fresh agent per task with review between iterations
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anymasoft/1c-aitheir own version, first seen Jul 17, 2026
- Arman-Kudaibergenov/1c-ai-development-kittheir own version, first seen Mar 4, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- Arman-Kudaibergenov/1c-ai-development-kit★ 163same name
- anymasoft/1c-ai★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository84 other files it gives its agents.
- api-design-reviewerSkill
- api-test-suite-builderSkill
- ask-mattSkill
- aws-solution-architectSkill
- captureSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- ci-cd-pipeline-builderSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- codebase-designSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- context-compressSkill
- context-modeSkill
- database-designerSkill
- database-schema-designerSkill
- dependency-auditorSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- env-secrets-managerSkill
- finish-branchSkill
- firecrawlSkill
- focused-fixSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- get-shit-doneSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- git-worktree-managerSkill
- git-worktreesSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- memSkill
- migration-architectSkill
- monorepo-navigatorSkill
- observability-designerSkill
- performance-profilerSkill
- playwright-testingSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-debtSkill
- ponytail-gainSkill
- ponytail-helpSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- ponytailSkill
- prompt-engineeringSkill
- prototypeSkill
- pr-review-expertSkill
- rag-architectSkill
- red-teamSkill
- reflectSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- root-cause-tracingSkill
- runbook-generatorSkill
- self-evalSkill
- senior-architectSkill
- senior-backendSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Subagent-Driven Development
Dispatch fresh subagent per task for fast, isolated execution with quality gates.
When to Use
- 3+ independent issues to investigate
- Implementation plan with independent tasks
- Need parallel execution without context pollution
- Multiple test failures across different files
Sequential Execution
For tightly coupled tasks that must run in order:
For each task:
1. Dispatch implementation subagent
2. Review output
3. Fix issues if found
4. Mark complete, move to nextParallel Execution
For independent tasks (different files, subsystems):
1. Identify independent domains
2. Dispatch one agent per domain
3. Review all results
4. Verify no conflicts
5. Run full test suiteSubagent Prompt Template
You are implementing [TASK] from [PLAN].
Your job:
1. Read the requirements carefully
2. Implement exactly what's specified
3. Write tests (TDD if specified)
4. Verify implementation works
5. Commit your work
6. Report back
Constraints:
- Don't change code outside your scope
- Follow existing patterns
- Use project's test framework
Report: What you implemented, tests run, files changed, any issues.Review After Each Agent
Review the changes from the last subagent:
- Check for correctness
- Verify tests pass
- Look for scope creep
- Check code quality
- Report issues by severity: Critical/Important/MinorRules
- Fresh subagent per task — no context pollution
- Review between tasks — catch issues early
- Don't parallelize coupled tasks — conflicts will occur
- Stop on blockers — don't guess, ask
- Verify full test suite — after all agents complete
When NOT to Use
- Tasks are tightly coupled
- Need full system context to understand
- Exploratory debugging (don't know what's broken)
- Agents would edit same files
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

