get-shit-done
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute tasks efficiently with minimal overhead — parallelize, batch, and ship
In this repository84 other files it gives its agents.
- api-design-reviewerSkill
- api-test-suite-builderSkill
- ask-mattSkill
- aws-solution-architectSkill
- captureSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- ci-cd-pipeline-builderSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- codebase-designSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- context-compressSkill
- context-modeSkill
- database-designerSkill
- database-schema-designerSkill
- dependency-auditorSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- env-secrets-managerSkill
- finish-branchSkill
- firecrawlSkill
- focused-fixSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- git-worktree-managerSkill
- git-worktreesSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- memSkill
- migration-architectSkill
- monorepo-navigatorSkill
- observability-designerSkill
- performance-profilerSkill
- playwright-testingSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-debtSkill
- ponytail-gainSkill
- ponytail-helpSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- ponytailSkill
- prompt-engineeringSkill
- prototypeSkill
- pr-review-expertSkill
- rag-architectSkill
- red-teamSkill
- reflectSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- root-cause-tracingSkill
- runbook-generatorSkill
- self-evalSkill
- senior-architectSkill
- senior-backendSkill
- senior-devopsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use subagents for parallel exploration, testing, implementation
- Distinctive: line 16
Don't wait for one thing when you can do five
- Distinctive: line 20
All edits in one pass, not one-at-a-time
- Distinctive: line 22
Run all tests together, not individually
- Distinctive: line 26
No ceremonial planning for obvious tasks
- Distinctive: line 27
No excessive documentation for self-evident code
- Distinctive: line 28
No meetings about meetings
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Get Shit Done
Speed and focus. Minimize ceremony, maximize output. Ship working code.
Core Principles
1. Parallelize Everything
- Independent tasks? Run them simultaneously
- Use subagents for parallel exploration, testing, implementation
- Don't wait for one thing when you can do five
2. Batch Similar Work
- All edits in one pass, not one-at-a-time
- Group related file changes
- Run all tests together, not individually
3. Skip Unnecessary Steps
- No ceremonial planning for obvious tasks
- No excessive documentation for self-evident code
- No meetings about meetings
- Straight to implementation when intent is clear
4. Fail Fast, Fix Fast
- Hit an error? Diagnose immediately, don't accumulate
- Wrong approach? Pivot instantly, don't sunk-cost
- Blocked? Flag it and move to next task
Execution Pattern
1. Understand the ask (30 seconds)
2. Identify the fastest path (1 minute)
3. Execute in parallel where possible
4. Verify results
5. Move onWhen to Slow Down
- Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, input validation)
- Data migration (irreversible operations)
- Public API changes (breaking changes affect others)
- User-facing UX (measure twice, cut once)
Anti-Patterns
| Pattern | Problem |
| Over-planning | Analysis paralysis |
| Perfect before working | Never ships |
| Manual when automated | Wasted time |
| Sequential when parallel | Slow for no reason |
| Discussion without action | Talk is cheap |
Decision Framework
Is this reversible?
Yes → Do it now, fix later if wrong
No → Think for 2 minutes, then decide
Is this blocking others?
Yes → Prioritize, unblock immediately
No → Queue it, work on high-impact
Is there a simpler way?
Yes → Do that instead
No → Proceed with current approachTime Boxing
- Simple task: 15 minutes max before asking for help
- Complex task: 1 hour before reassessing approach
- Stuck: 5 minutes of debugging, then search/docs/ask
Output Over Process
Working code > Perfect documentation Shipped feature > Planned feature Tested implementation > Theoretical design
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

