agentleFS
kazemcodeskazemcodes/skill-tree/skills/get-shit-done/SKILL.md

get-shit-done

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Execute tasks efficiently with minimal overhead — parallelize, batch, and ship

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use subagents for parallel exploration, testing, implementation

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Don't wait for one thing when you can do five

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    All edits in one pass, not one-at-a-time

    line 20
  4. Distinctive:

    Run all tests together, not individually

    line 22
  5. Distinctive:

    No ceremonial planning for obvious tasks

    line 26
  6. Distinctive:

    No excessive documentation for self-evident code

    line 27
  7. Distinctive:

    No meetings about meetings

    line 28

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Get Shit Done

Speed and focus. Minimize ceremony, maximize output. Ship working code.

Core Principles

1. Parallelize Everything

  • Independent tasks? Run them simultaneously
  • Use subagents for parallel exploration, testing, implementation
  • Don't wait for one thing when you can do five

2. Batch Similar Work

  • All edits in one pass, not one-at-a-time
  • Group related file changes
  • Run all tests together, not individually

3. Skip Unnecessary Steps

  • No ceremonial planning for obvious tasks
  • No excessive documentation for self-evident code
  • No meetings about meetings
  • Straight to implementation when intent is clear

4. Fail Fast, Fix Fast

  • Hit an error? Diagnose immediately, don't accumulate
  • Wrong approach? Pivot instantly, don't sunk-cost
  • Blocked? Flag it and move to next task

Execution Pattern

1. Understand the ask (30 seconds)
2. Identify the fastest path (1 minute)
3. Execute in parallel where possible
4. Verify results
5. Move on

When to Slow Down

  • Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, input validation)
  • Data migration (irreversible operations)
  • Public API changes (breaking changes affect others)
  • User-facing UX (measure twice, cut once)

Anti-Patterns

PatternProblem
Over-planningAnalysis paralysis
Perfect before workingNever ships
Manual when automatedWasted time
Sequential when parallelSlow for no reason
Discussion without actionTalk is cheap

Decision Framework

Is this reversible?
  Yes → Do it now, fix later if wrong
  No  → Think for 2 minutes, then decide

Is this blocking others?
  Yes → Prioritize, unblock immediately
  No  → Queue it, work on high-impact

Is there a simpler way?
  Yes → Do that instead
  No  → Proceed with current approach

Time Boxing

  • Simple task: 15 minutes max before asking for help
  • Complex task: 1 hour before reassessing approach
  • Stuck: 5 minutes of debugging, then search/docs/ask

Output Over Process

Working code > Perfect documentation Shipped feature > Planned feature Tested implementation > Theoretical design

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.