ship-gate
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Pre-production audit that scans a codebase for security, database, deployment, code quality, AI/LLM, dependency, frontend, and observability issues. Intercepts deploy commands and blocks until critical items pass. Stack-agnostic. Use for "run ship gate", "am I ready to ship", "pre-launch audit", "can I deploy", "push to production", "go live checklist", "preflight check". Not for CI/CD setup or infra provisioning.
11 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- darkweb19/skillsword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hamidettefagh/two-gatestheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- tderoussel/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- edenbuilds/agentlooptheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- sunnybhara/claude-startertheir own version, first seen Aug 14, 2026
- Hassaan146/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Jul 25, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18100% same
- csiddhant796-blip/claude-skills-collection★ 2100% same
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1100% same
- darkweb19/skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 1
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 299% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- unlearndev/skills★ 101same name
- orkait/hyperstack★ 1same name
- tderoussel/agent-skills★ 1same name
- edenbuilds/agentloop★ 0same name
- hamidettefagh/two-gates★ 0same name
- sunnybhara/claude-starter★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository84 other files it gives its agents.
- api-design-reviewerSkill
- api-test-suite-builderSkill
- ask-mattSkill
- aws-solution-architectSkill
- captureSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- ci-cd-pipeline-builderSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- codebase-designSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- context-compressSkill
- context-modeSkill
- database-designerSkill
- database-schema-designerSkill
- dependency-auditorSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- env-secrets-managerSkill
- finish-branchSkill
- firecrawlSkill
- focused-fixSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- get-shit-doneSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- git-worktree-managerSkill
- git-worktreesSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- memSkill
- migration-architectSkill
- monorepo-navigatorSkill
- observability-designerSkill
- performance-profilerSkill
- playwright-testingSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-debtSkill
- ponytail-gainSkill
- ponytail-helpSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- ponytailSkill
- prompt-engineeringSkill
- prototypeSkill
- pr-review-expertSkill
- rag-architectSkill
- red-teamSkill
- reflectSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- root-cause-tracingSkill
- runbook-generatorSkill
- self-evalSkill
- senior-architectSkill
- senior-backendSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
When the user says "push to production", "deploy", "ship it", "go live", or similar deploy-intent phrases, do NOT proceed with deployment.
- Distinctive: line 26
Ask: "Have you run the ship gate?
- Distinctive: line 27
If yes, run the full audit below.
- Distinctive: line 28
If the user says they already ran it, ask when.
- Distinctive: line 35
Run these checks in order to identify the project stack:
- Distinctive: line 89
Run categories in this order: SEC, DB, CODE, DEP, AI, DEPLOY, FE, OBS.
- Distinctive: line 153
If zero critical items remain, verdict is: CLEAR TO SHIP.
- Distinctive: line 154
If only high items remain, verdict is: SHIP WITH CAUTION (acknowledge risks).
- Distinctive: line 183
Run after deployment (it is pre-deploy only)
- Distinctive: line 187
karpathy-coder: run ship-gate after karpathy-check passes — simplicity first, then production readiness
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ship Gate
Pre-production audit that scans a codebase and reports pass/fail/manual across 8 categories before anything ships.
Intercept Behavior
When the user says "push to production", "deploy", "ship it", "go live", or similar deploy-intent phrases, do NOT proceed with deployment. Instead:
- Ask: "Have you run the ship gate? Want me to scan now?"
- If yes, run the full audit below.
- If the user says they already ran it, ask when. If more than 24 hours ago or if code changed since, recommend re-running.
How It Works
Step 1: Detect Stack
Run these checks in order to identify the project stack:
Framework detection:
package.json exists -> Node.js project
"next" in dependencies -> Next.js
"react" in dependencies -> React (if not Next.js)
"vue" in dependencies -> Vue
"svelte" in dependencies -> Svelte
"astro" in dependencies -> Astro
"express" in dependencies -> Express
"fastify" in dependencies -> Fastify
"hono" in dependencies -> Hono
requirements.txt or pyproject.toml -> Python project
"django" present -> Django
"flask" present -> Flask
"fastapi" present -> FastAPI
go.mod exists -> Go project
Cargo.toml exists -> Rust project
Database detection:
"@supabase/supabase-js" in package.json -> Supabase
supabase/ directory exists -> Supabase
"prisma" in dependencies -> Prisma (check schema for DB type)
"mongoose" in dependencies -> MongoDB
"pg" or "postgres" in dependencies -> PostgreSQL
firebase.json or .firebaserc exists -> Firebase
Deploy target detection:
vercel.json or .vercel/ exists -> Vercel
netlify.toml exists -> Netlify
Dockerfile exists -> Docker/VPS
fly.toml exists -> Fly.io
railway.json exists -> Railway
.platform/applications.yaml -> Platform.sh
Auth detection:
"@clerk" in dependencies -> Clerk
"next-auth" in dependencies -> NextAuth
"@supabase/auth-helpers" in deps -> Supabase Auth
"firebase/auth" in imports -> Firebase Auth
AI/LLM detection:
"openai" in dependencies -> OpenAI
"@anthropic-ai/sdk" in dependencies -> Claude API
"@google/generative-ai" in deps -> GeminiReport detected stack before proceeding. This determines which checks
are relevant. Checks tagged with a specific stack in references/checks.md
are skipped if that stack is not detected.
Step 2: Run Automated Checks
Run categories in this order: SEC, DB, CODE, DEP, AI, DEPLOY, FE, OBS. Security and database first because they produce the most critical findings.
For each category, run every auto-scannable check from
references/checks.md using the patterns in references/patterns.md.
Report progress after each category completes:
[1/8] Security: 3 FAIL, 12 PASS, 3 SKIP
[2/8] Database: 1 FAIL, 5 PASS, 6 SKIP
...Report results as:
- PASS: check passed
- FAIL: issue found (with file path and line number)
- SKIP: not applicable to this stack
Step 3: Manual Confirmation
For checks that cannot be automated (backup restore tested, rollback plan exists, staging test passed), present them as a checklist and ask the user to confirm each one.
Step 4: Verdict
Classify results into three severities:
- CRITICAL: must fix before shipping (secrets exposed, no auth on routes, no HTTPS, SQL injection vectors, no RLS on Supabase tables)
- HIGH: should fix before shipping (no error boundaries, no rate limiting, console.logs in production, no pagination)
- ADVISORY: recommended but not blocking (no OG tags, no custom 404, no analytics, no SBOM)
Final output:
SHIP GATE REPORT
================
Stack: Next.js + Supabase + Vercel
Scan time: 12s
CRITICAL (3 items, must fix)
FAIL [SEC-01] API key found in src/lib/api.ts:14
FAIL [DB-07] RLS not enabled on "profiles" table
FAIL [SEC-05] No CSRF protection on /api/checkout
HIGH (5 items, should fix)
FAIL [CODE-01] 12 console.log statements in production code
FAIL [CODE-03] Empty catch block in src/utils/auth.ts:45
FAIL [DEP-04] 3 critical npm audit vulnerabilities
FAIL [DEPLOY-05] No rollback plan documented
MANUAL [DEPLOY-06] Staging test not confirmed
ADVISORY (4 items, recommended)
FAIL [FE-01] Missing OG meta tags
FAIL [FE-03] No custom 404 page
PASS [OBS-01] Error monitoring configured
SKIP [AI-01] No AI/LLM usage detected
VERDICT: DO NOT SHIP (3 critical issues)
Fix critical items and re-run.If zero critical items remain, verdict is: CLEAR TO SHIP. If only high items remain, verdict is: SHIP WITH CAUTION (acknowledge risks).
Categories
Eight categories, each with a code prefix. Full check details in
references/checks.md.
| Prefix | Category | Auto | Manual | Tool |
| SEC | Security | 15 | 3 | 0 |
| DB | Database | 7 | 5 | 0 |
| DEPLOY | Deployment | 3 | 8 | 0 |
| CODE | Code Quality | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| AI | AI/LLM Security | 5 | 3 | 0 |
| DEP | Dependencies | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| FE | Frontend Quality | 7 | 3 | 0 |
| OBS | Observability | 2 | 5 | 0 |
Scope
This skill audits. It does not fix. When it finds issues, it reports them with file locations and remediation guidance. The user or another skill (systematic-debugging, backend-patterns, shadcn-stack) handles the fix.
This skill does not:
- Set up CI/CD pipelines
- Provision infrastructure
- Configure monitoring tools
- Run after deployment (it is pre-deploy only)
Integration Points
- karpathy-coder: run ship-gate after karpathy-check passes — simplicity first, then production readiness
- adversarial-reviewer: deep security review for items ship-gate flags as critical
- security-pen-testing: penetration testing methodology for SEC-category findings
- code-reviewer: general code quality review complements ship-gate's automated checks
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

