agentleFS
katalon-labskatalon-labs/true-skills/skills/test-plan/SKILL.md

test-plan

Skill10 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Plan Katalon True Platform/TestOps testing for a release, sprint, or feature. Use when you need to translate quality goals into scope, prioritize testing by requirement coverage and risk, decide what to test first, or build the executable plan structure (folders, suites, and sprint/release association) that stands in for a formal Test Plan. Reads project/repository/iteration context and requirement coverage, then proposes and materializes a prioritized plan. For designing the actual test cases, hand off to create-test-cases; for the ship/no-ship call, hand off to release-analyze. Written for the test lead who owns the cycle and has to decide what gets tested first.

17 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Not directly available: create a Release or Build entity, create a formal Test Plan entity, or author release gates through MCP.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Read coverage and gaps: Use fetch_requirement_data for requirement coverage status and find_test_cases_by_requirement to see which …

    line 34
  3. Very specific:

    Read references/planning-workflow.md before proposing scope.

    line 53

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Katalon Test Plan

Use this skill for the planning stage of the Katalon lifecycle: turn quality goals into a scoped, risk-prioritized, executable plan. The output is a plan the team can act on plus the folder/suite/release structure that makes it runnable. Prefer Katalon MCP tools for platform data; use the human as a tool when scope, risk appetite, or release target cannot be resolved safely.

Availability Boundary

State the boundary before promising a plan:

  • Available via MCP: resolve scope (list_projects, list_repositories, find_iterations), read requirement coverage and gaps (fetch_requirement_data, find_requirements, find_test_cases_by_requirement), and build the executable plan structure (manage_test_folder, manage_test_suite, add cases to suites).
  • Not directly available: create a Release or Build entity, create a formal Test Plan entity, or author release gates through MCP. These live in the TestOps UI.
  • Workaround (the MCP-legal test plan): a named folder + test suite associated with a sprint/release is the executable plan. Create it, populate it, and report it as the plan of record.

Planning Workflow

+---------------+     +----------------------+     +----------------------+
| Resolve scope | --> | Read coverage + risk | --> | Prioritize what first|
+---------------+     +----------------------+     +----------------------+
        |                        |                             |
        v                        v                             v
+---------------+     +----------------------+     +----------------------+
| Propose plan  | --> | Build folder + suite | --> | Associate sprint/rel |
+---------------+     +----------------------+     +----------------------+

Steps and tool rules

  1. Resolve scope. list_projects -> list_repositories. If exactly one matches the user's wording or context, use it. Use find_iterations to bind the plan to a sprint/release when named.
  2. Read coverage and gaps. Use fetch_requirement_data for requirement coverage status and find_test_cases_by_requirement to see which requirements already have cases. find_requirements / read_requirement when requirement keys are supplied.
  3. Prioritize by risk and evidence. Rank scope using: requirement coverage gaps first, then high-change/high-traffic areas, then areas with historically unstable tests (defer stability detail to test-review). State the risk basis; do not invent traffic numbers the MCP does not return.
  4. Propose the plan in chat. Objectives, in-scope / out-of-scope, coverage matrix (requirement -> planned cases), risk ranking, target environments, and the suite/folder structure you will create.
  5. Materialize the executable structure. manage_test_folder for the plan folder, manage_test_suite for the runnable suite, add the selected/known cases. Reuse an existing folder/suite when one already matches instead of creating a duplicate.
  6. Verify and report. read_test_suite to confirm; report the plan of record with the suite as the executable artifact and the open gaps to fill next.

Prompt recipes

  • Plan testing for sprint 3.2 in project Cellphone Shop: show coverage gaps and build the executable suite.
  • What should we test first for release R-2026-Q3 based on requirement coverage? Propose a risk-ranked plan.
  • Create a test plan structure (folder + suite) for requirement CEL-6 and associate it with the current sprint.

Hand-offs

  • Gaps to fill -> create-test-cases.
  • Plan ready to run -> execute-test.
  • Ship decision on the planned scope -> release-analyze.
  • Traceability audit of the plan -> test-management.

Read references/planning-workflow.md before proposing scope. Read the orchestrator true-platform-testing/references/unavailable-capabilities.md when the user asks "can Katalon plan X?".

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.