agentleFS
katalon-labskatalon-labs/true-skills/skills/execute-test/SKILL.md

execute-test

Skill10 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Execute Katalon True Platform/TestOps tests when the input is an existing test case, manual test case list, test suite, suite collection, execution request, or "run with AI" instruction. Use when you need to create a manual test run, start Run with AI, poll AI session results, schedule automated suites, read execution/test results, or summarize pass/fail/blocked outcomes. For full requirement-to-test-design-to-execution workflows, combine with or defer to true-platform-testing. Written for the manual tester who has cases and needs a result, by hand or through Run with AI. A coded suite driven from a framework starts at playwright-execute or upload-report.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

25 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 11

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill for running already-selected Katalon test cases or suites and reporting execution outcomes.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Not directly available: guarantee AI completion, inspect the live AUT UI through Katalon MCP, or run manual test cases through the …

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Use Browser/Playwright only when AUT exploration or visual verification outside Katalon MCP is needed.

    line 16
  4. Very specific:

    Read references/capability-boundaries.md when capability scope is unclear.

    line 18
  5. Distinctive:

    Before creating or scheduling any run:

    line 22
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask only when multiple equally valid repositories remain, required credentials are missing, or the next action is destructive.

    line 28
  7. Distinctive:

    Use manual execution when:

    line 32
  8. Distinctive:

    Use automated execution only when the input is an automated suite or suite collection.

    line 39
  9. Distinctive:

    If the user only says "run tests" and the type cannot be inferred, ask whether they want manual or automated execution.

    line 41
  10. Distinctive:

    Always follow this order:

    line 45
  11. Very specific:

    Call read_auts immediately before create_manual_test_run.

    line 47
  12. Very specific:

    If a suite is provided, call read_test_suite before creating the run.

    line 49
  13. Very specific:

    If individual cases are provided, call read_test_case for unclear or risky inputs.

    line 50
  14. Very specific:

    Create the manual run with create_manual_test_run.

    line 51
  15. Very specific:

    Start Run with AI automatically with create_manual_ai_session unless the user explicitly says not to run AI.

    line 52
  16. Distinctive:

    Read available execution/test result details before responding.

    line 54
  17. Distinctive:

    Never reuse AUT environment selection from an earlier turn or earlier run.

    line 58
  18. Very specific:

    If no AUT exists and a URL is known from the user, requirement, or test data, use it as default_aut_environment_url.

    line 60
  19. Distinctive:

    Ask only when multiple AUTs are equally plausible or no target URL can be resolved.

    line 61
  20. Very specific:

    Read references/execution-workflow.md before creating manual executions.

    line 63
  21. Distinctive:

    Use automated execution only for automated suites:

    line 67
  22. Very specific:

    Read execution and test results with read_execution, read_execution_test_results, and read_test_result as needed.

    line 75
  23. Very specific:

    Do not call create_manual_test_run for automated suites, and do not call schedule_test_run for individual manual test cases.

    line 77
  24. Distinctive:

    Run name and link when returned.

    line 83
  25. Distinctive:

    Ask before creating ALM-linked defects unless the user explicitly requested defect creation for failures.

    line 90

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Katalon Execute Test

Use this skill for running already-selected Katalon test cases or suites and reporting execution outcomes. Keep the larger true-platform-testing skill as the end-to-end orchestrator; this skill is the focused execution workflow.

Availability Boundary

State the execution boundary before running:

  • Available: read AUT environments, create manual test runs, start Run with AI, poll AI sessions, schedule automated suite runs, and read execution/test results.
  • Not directly available: guarantee AI completion, inspect the live AUT UI through Katalon MCP, or run manual test cases through the automated scheduler.
  • Use Browser/Playwright only when AUT exploration or visual verification outside Katalon MCP is needed.

Read references/capability-boundaries.md when capability scope is unclear.

Resolve Context First

Before creating or scheduling any run:

  1. Call list_projects.
  2. Call list_repositories.
  3. Resolve the repository/Test Project from the user's wording or unique available repository.

Ask only when multiple equally valid repositories remain, required credentials are missing, or the next action is destructive.

Choose Execution Type

Use manual execution when:

  • The user provides manual test cases.
  • The user asks for Run with AI.
  • The test cases were just created in Katalon.
  • The input is a manual suite.

Use automated execution only when the input is an automated suite or suite collection.

If the user only says "run tests" and the type cannot be inferred, ask whether they want manual or automated execution.

Manual Run With AI

Always follow this order:

  1. Call read_auts immediately before create_manual_test_run.
  2. Resolve the manual cases or suites.
  3. If a suite is provided, call read_test_suite before creating the run.
  4. If individual cases are provided, call read_test_case for unclear or risky inputs.
  5. Create the manual run with create_manual_test_run.
  6. Start Run with AI automatically with create_manual_ai_session unless the user explicitly says not to run AI.
  7. Poll read_manual_ai_session until all items leave TODO/IN_TESTING, or the platform returns an external timeout/error.
  8. Read available execution/test result details before responding.

AUT rules:

  • Never reuse AUT environment selection from an earlier turn or earlier run.
  • Choose the AUT/environment whose URL or name clearly matches the target AUT.
  • If no AUT exists and a URL is known from the user, requirement, or test data, use it as default_aut_environment_url.
  • Ask only when multiple AUTs are equally plausible or no target URL can be resolved.

Read references/execution-workflow.md before creating manual executions.

Automated Execution

Use automated execution only for automated suites:

  1. Find automated suites or suite collections with find_test_suites.
  2. Find execution profiles with find_execution_profiles.
  3. Find TestCloud environments with list_test_cloud_environments.
  4. Build the run configuration with build_run_configuration.
  5. Optionally build a schedule with build_schedule.
  6. Run with schedule_test_run.
  7. Read execution and test results with read_execution, read_execution_test_results, and read_test_result as needed.

Do not call create_manual_test_run for automated suites, and do not call schedule_test_run for individual manual test cases.

Report Results

After execution, report:

  • Run name and link when returned.
  • Final status.
  • Passed, failed, blocked/incomplete, and not-run counts.
  • Failed cases with concise failure reasons.
  • Defects created or recommended.
  • Gaps, skipped cases, and manual follow-up required.

Ask before creating ALM-linked defects unless the user explicitly requested defect creation for failures.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.