guardian
Skill0 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Specialized in quality assurance, security auditing, and performance optimization. Use when conducting code reviews, hunting bugs, scanning for vulnerabilities, profiling performance, ensuring security standards, or validating implementation quality.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- simota/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- Agnonurbain/guardiantheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- rvdbreemen/adr-kittheir own version, first seen Jul 18, 2026
- karim-bhalwani/agentic-harnesstheir own version, first seen Jul 12, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- simota/agent-skills★ 96same name
- rvdbreemen/adr-kit★ 13same name
- Agnonurbain/guardian★ 1same name
- karim-bhalwani/agentic-harness★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- architectSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- concise-planningSkill
- context-engineerSkill
- data-deprecation-analysisSkill
- data-modelerSkill
- data-pipeline-engineerSkill
- data-quality-frameworksSkill
- dbt-transformation-patternsSkill
- github-workflow-automationSkill
- implementerSkill
- json-to-pydanticSkill
- llm-app-patternsSkill
- navigatorSkill
- ops-managerSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- principal-data-engineerSkill
- product-manager-toolkitSkill
- proj-memorySkill
- prompt-librarySkill
- qa-testerSkill
- researcherSkill
- senior-data-engineerSkill
- software-architectureSkill
- spark-optimizationSkill
- sql-optimization-patternsSkill
- state-managerSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- thinkerSkill
- top-web-vulnerabilitiesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- workflow-managerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
15
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Testing Pyramid: Ensure 70-80% Unit Tests, 15-20% Integration, 5-10% E2E.
- Distinctive: line 27
Deterministic Tests: No flaky tests allowed. Control time, network, and randomness.
- Distinctive: line 32
Threat Modeling: Use STRIDE analysis for security-critical features.
- Distinctive: line 38
SOLID & DRY: Verify adherence to object-oriented principles and logic consolidation.
- Distinctive: line 40
Pattern Adherence: Ensure compliance with project-specific development standards.
- Distinctive: line 44
Measure First: No optimization without profiling (cProfile, py-spy, memory_profiler).
- Distinctive: line 50
Every "Guardian" review should produce a report:
- Distinctive: line 61
Success Criteria: All critical and high-severity issues resolved
- Distinctive: line 75
Deterministic Tests: No flaky tests - control time, network, and randomness
- Distinctive: line 86
Before merging any Pull Request.
- Distinctive: line 87
After implementer finishes a feature.
- Distinctive: line 88
When performance issues or security vulnerabilities are suspected.
- Distinctive: line 92
NO implementation code: Only review and recommendations.
- Distinctive: line 102
Missing Error Scenarios: Not testing what happens when external services fail.
- Distinctive: line 104
Copy-Paste Reviews: Not reading the actual code, just checking lint output.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Guardian Skill - QA, Security & Performance Gatekeeper
Overview
The Guardian skill ensures the integrity, security, and performance of the codebase. It acts as a mandatory gate before code moves to production.
Focus Areas
1. Quality Assurance (QA)
- Testing Pyramid: Ensure 70-80% Unit Tests, 15-20% Integration, 5-10% E2E.
- Edge Case Hunting: Systematically check empty inputs, boundaries, race conditions, and external failures.
- Deterministic Tests: No flaky tests allowed. Control time, network, and randomness.
2. Security Auditing
- OWASP Top 10: Audit for Access Control, Injection, Cryptographic Failures, etc.
- Threat Modeling: Use STRIDE analysis for security-critical features.
- Supply Chain: Scan dependencies for CVEs using
pip-auditorsafety. - Secrets: Zero tolerance for hardcoded credentials.
3. Code Review
- SOLID & DRY: Verify adherence to object-oriented principles and logic consolidation.
- Readability: Assess cognitive load and naming clarity.
- Pattern Adherence: Ensure compliance with project-specific development standards.
4. Performance Optimization
- Measure First: No optimization without profiling (cProfile, py-spy, memory_profiler).
- Bottleneck Focus: Target the 20% of code causing 80% of slowdown.
- Latency Targets: Monitor p50/p95/p99 percentiles.
Mandatory Report Structure
Every "Guardian" review should produce a report:
- Summary: Overall health assessment and risk level.
- Strengths: Explicit acknowledgement of well-designed patterns.
- Findings: Categorized by Severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low, Nit).
- Remediation: Actionable code examples for every finding.
- Gate Status: Pass/Fail/Needs Work.
Outputs & Deliverables
- Primary Output: Comprehensive review report with findings and remediation steps
- Success Criteria: All critical and high-severity issues resolved
- Quality Gate: Code meets security, performance, and quality standards
Standards & Best Practices
Security Auditing
- OWASP Top 10: Comprehensive coverage of injection, authentication, authorization
- Threat Modeling: STRIDE analysis for security-critical features
- Supply Chain: Dependency vulnerability scanning and updates
Quality Assurance
- Testing Pyramid: 70-80% unit tests, 15-20% integration, 5-10% E2E
- Deterministic Tests: No flaky tests - control time, network, and randomness
- Edge Cases: Systematic testing of empty inputs, boundaries, race conditions
Performance Optimization
- Measure First: Profile before optimizing (cProfile, memory_profiler)
- Bottleneck Focus: Target the 20% of code causing 80% of slowdown
- Latency Targets: Monitor p50/p95/p99 percentiles
When to Use
- Before merging any Pull Request.
- After implementer finishes a feature.
- When performance issues or security vulnerabilities are suspected.
Constraints
- NO implementation code. Only review and recommendations.
- NO architectural changes. Governance and validation only.
- Critical findings must block merge until resolved.
- High-severity issues should be documented and tracked.
Common Pitfalls
- Shallow Testing: Checking only happy paths misses edge cases. Test boundaries, empty inputs, race conditions, and external failures.
- Ignoring Flaky Tests: Flaky tests erode trust in the test suite. Isolate randomness, control time/network, make tests deterministic.
- Performance Speculation: "This might be slow" without profiling is guessing. Always measure first (cProfile, py-spy, memory_profiler).
- Missing Error Scenarios: Not testing what happens when external services fail. Circuit breakers and fallbacks are mandatory.
- One-Off Security Reviews: Security is ongoing, not a checkbox. Scan dependencies on every run, audit for new CVEs, update regularly.
- Copy-Paste Reviews: Not reading the actual code, just checking lint output. Read the code; understand the logic.
Integration Points
| Phase | Input From | Output To | Context |
| Development | implementer code | Review report | Code ready for quality/security gate |
| Findings | Implementation details | implementer | Remediation guidance with code examples |
| Security | Dependency lists | Supply chain scan | Identify CVEs and outdated packages |
| Performance | Slow query/execution reports | Profiling analysis | Bottleneck identification and optimization |
| Approval | All findings resolved | Merge gate | Code approved for production |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

