data-pipeline-engineer
Skill0 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Specialist in hands-on ETL/ELT design, implementation, and optimization using Airflow, Spark, Kafka, dbt, and data quality frameworks. Use when building data pipelines, orchestrating data workflows, optimizing data processing, implementing streaming solutions, or ensuring data quality throughout pipelines.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dhriyatinandu-bot/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 5, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- dhriyatinandu-bot/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- architectSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- concise-planningSkill
- context-engineerSkill
- data-deprecation-analysisSkill
- data-modelerSkill
- data-quality-frameworksSkill
- dbt-transformation-patternsSkill
- github-workflow-automationSkill
- guardianSkill
- implementerSkill
- json-to-pydanticSkill
- llm-app-patternsSkill
- navigatorSkill
- ops-managerSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- principal-data-engineerSkill
- product-manager-toolkitSkill
- proj-memorySkill
- prompt-librarySkill
- qa-testerSkill
- researcherSkill
- senior-data-engineerSkill
- software-architectureSkill
- spark-optimizationSkill
- sql-optimization-patternsSkill
- state-managerSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- thinkerSkill
- top-web-vulnerabilitiesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- workflow-managerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 53
Document partitioning and incremental processing approach
- Distinctive: line 66
Add quality checks and validation
- Distinctive: line 96
Always implement incremental processing.
- Distinctive: line 99
Use medallion architecture as default (Bronze → Silver → Gold)
- Distinctive: line 103
No top-level code; all logic inside tasks or macros
- Distinctive: line 107
Document task SLAs and alert on misses
- Very specific: line 113
Use dbt test or Great Expectations, not manual validation
- Very specific: line 119
Use appropriate file formats (Parquet/Delta/Iceberg, not CSV for large data)
- Distinctive: line 129
No hardcoded dates or environment-specific logic.
- Distinctive: line 138
All pipelines must be monitored and auditable (SLAs, alerts, lineage)
- Distinctive: line 151
Undocumented Lineage: No one knows data provenance or downstream consumers.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
- etl
- spark
- kafka
- airflow
- streaming
Data Pipeline Engineer - Implementation Specialist
Overview
The Data Pipeline Engineer skill focuses on the "How" and "Why" of building production data pipelines—from architectural choices through implementation and optimization. This is the hands-on execution role for ETL/ELT systems, complementing the architect's design and the principal engineer's strategic guidance.
This skill bridges requirements and production systems, making pragmatic architecture decisions, implementing patterns correctly, and optimizing for reliability and performance. Use this skill for:
- Designing and implementing medallion/lambda/kappa architectures
- Building Airflow DAGs with robust retry logic and monitoring
- Implementing batch and streaming pipelines at scale
- Integrating data quality frameworks into pipelines
- Optimizing pipeline performance and cost
Core Capabilities
- Architecture Decision-Making: Choose between Medallion, Lambda, Kappa based on requirements
- Airflow DAG Development: Complex orchestration with sensors, task groups, and cross-DAG dependencies
- Spark & Streaming: Batch and stream processing with proper partitioning and windowing
- dbt Integration: Orchestrate and test SQL transformations as part of pipeline workflows
- Data Quality Integration: Embed Great Expectations or dbt tests as pipeline dependencies
- Incremental Processing: Design idempotent, re-runnable transformations for cost efficiency
- Monitoring & Lineage: Implement observability for pipeline health, SLAs, and data lineage
Workflow / Process
Phase 1: Architecture Selection
- Analyze data volumes, freshness, and source characteristics
- Decide: Medallion (most common), Lambda (batch + streaming), or Kappa (streaming-only)
- Define layering strategy (Bronze/Silver/Gold or staging/intermediate/marts)
- Document partitioning and incremental processing approach
Phase 2: Pipeline Design
- Break into logical domains (not monolithic DAGs)
- Define task boundaries and dependencies
- Plan retry, alerting, and SLA strategies
- Design data quality gates at each layer
Phase 3: Implementation
- Scaffold Airflow DAG structure
- Implement data transformations (Spark, dbt, SQL)
- Add quality checks and validation
- Setup monitoring and lineage tracking
Phase 4: Optimization
- Profile and tune Spark/SQL performance
- Implement incremental processing where possible
- Optimize partitioning and indexing
- Monitor costs and adjust concurrency/parallelism
Outputs & Deliverables
- Primary Output: Production-ready Airflow DAGs, Spark/SQL transformations, dbt models, quality suites
- Secondary Output: Data lineage documentation, SLA/alerting configuration, runbooks
- Success Criteria: Pipelines run on schedule, data quality gates pass, SLAs met, incremental processing verified
- Quality Gate: Code review by
senior-data-engineer, data quality validation, monitoring dashboards active
When to Use
- Building a new ETL/ELT pipeline from scratch
- Implementing data platform features on existing infrastructure
- Optimizing pipeline performance or reducing costs
- Setting up data quality monitoring in production
- Integrating streaming or batch transformations
- Debugging pipeline failures or data anomalies
Standards & Best Practices
Pipeline Architecture
- Always implement incremental processing; avoid full table rebuilds
- Design idempotent transformations (safe to re-run without side effects)
- Separate orchestration (Airflow) from execution (Spark, dbt, Snowflake)
- Use medallion architecture as default (Bronze → Silver → Gold)
Airflow Best Practices
- No top-level code; all logic inside tasks or macros
- Atomic tasks: one clear responsibility per task
- Explicit retries (
retries=3) and backoff (retry_exponential_backoff=True) - Cross-DAG dependencies via sensors, not Airflow dependency injection
- Document task SLAs and alert on misses
Data Quality
- Quality checks are pipeline dependencies, not afterthoughts
- Tests at each layer: Schema (Bronze), Business Rules (Silver), Aggregation (Gold)
- Use
dbt testor Great Expectations, not manual validation - Block bad data from propagating downstream
Spark/SQL Optimization
- Partition strategically (date-based for time-series data)
- Use appropriate file formats (Parquet/Delta/Iceberg, not CSV for large data)
- Broadcast small tables in joins
- Monitor shuffle operations and partition counts
Constraints
Technical Constraints:
- Cannot override architect's spec. If pipeline design conflicts with spec, escalate to architect
- Data quality must pass before downstream tasks run
- No hardcoded dates or environment-specific logic; use Airflow templating and configs
Scope Constraints:
- In Scope: Airflow orchestration, Spark/SQL transforms, dbt integrations, quality frameworks
- Out of Scope: Infrastructure provisioning (use ops-manager), ML feature engineering (use ML skills)
Governance Constraints:
- All pipelines must be monitored and auditable (SLAs, alerts, lineage)
- Data retention policies must be documented and enforced
Common Pitfalls
- Full Table Refreshes: Truncating and rebuilding entire tables every run. Fix: Use incremental models with
is_incremental(), partition by date. - Monolithic DAGs: One 200-task DAG running 8 hours. Fix: Domain-specific DAGs, use ExternalTaskSensor for dependencies.
- No Data Quality Gates: Bad data reaches production before detection. Fix: Great Expectations or dbt tests at each layer, block on failures.
- Hardcoded Dates: Manual updates needed for date filters. Fix: Use Airflow templating (
{{ ds }}) or dynamic date functions. - Missing Watermarks: Unbounded state growth, OOM in streaming jobs. Fix: Add
withWatermark()in Spark Streaming to handle late-arriving data. - No Retry/Backoff: Transient failures cause DAG failures. Fix:
retries=3,retry_exponential_backoff=True,max_retry_delay - Processing Before Archiving: Losing raw data, breaking reproducibility. Fix: Always land raw in Bronze, make transforms reproducible.
- Tight Coupling to Source Schemas: Pipeline breaks when upstream adds/removes columns. Fix: Select only needed columns in staging, use source contracts.
- Undocumented Lineage: No one knows data provenance or downstream consumers. Fix: dbt docs, data catalog, OpenLineage, column-level lineage.
- Testing Only in Production: Bugs discovered by stakeholders. Fix: dbt
--target dev, sample datasets, CI/CD for models.
Integration Points
| Phase | Input From | Output To | Context |
| Requirements | architect, thinker | Pipeline design | Understanding data domain and constraints |
| Transformation | dbt models, Spark code | data-quality-frameworks | SQL/PySpark transformations with quality checks |
| Quality Validation | data-quality-frameworks | Monitoring systems | Data quality results and SLA tracking |
| Monitoring | Pipeline execution | ops-manager | Alerts, runbooks, infrastructure needs |
| Optimization | Performance issues | senior-data-engineer | Complex tuning or architectural review |
Version History:
- 1.0 (2026-01-24): Initial skill definition for hands-on pipeline implementation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

