readme-generator
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates project README.md files with the right sections (badges, install, usage, configuration, contributing, license) based on the project type and audience. Use this skill when the user asks to "write a README", "generate documentation", "make my repo presentable", or has a project that lacks a proper README.
37 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dmccreary/ibook-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Sagargupta16/agent-recipestheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jaskirat1616/grok-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- wedsamuel1230/arduino-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Tejas9406/vibe-coding-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- weininghui/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use book-chapter-generator, concept-classifier and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
vishalsachdevSkillbook-chapter-generator
This skill generates a structured chapter outline for intelligent textbooks by analyzing course descriptions, learning graphs, and concept dependencies. Use this skill after the learning graph has been created and before generating chapter content, to design an optimal chapter structure that respects concept dependencies and distributes content evenly across 6-20 chapters.
Also in 3 projects that use this
vishalsachdevSkillconcept-classifier
Create an interactive classification quiz MicroSim using p5.js where students read scenarios and classify them into the correct category from multiple choice options. Uses a data.json file for easy question editing. Ideal for teaching students to recognize patterns, identify types, or categorize examples across any subject domain.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JayRHaSkillchangelog-keeper
Maintains a CHANGELOG.md in the Keep a Changelog format with Semantic Versioning, grouping user-facing entries under Added/Changed/Deprecated/Removed/Fixed/Security and cutting dated releases from an Unreleased section. Use this skill when the user asks to "update the changelog", "add a changelog entry", "cut a release", "bump the version", "what changed since the last release", or to create/clean up a CHANGELOG.md or release notes.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ATOM00blueSkillerror-message-explainer
Explains errors, stack traces, exceptions, and cryptic build/runtime messages in plain language, identifies the root cause, and gives a concrete fix. Use when the user pastes an error, stack trace, traceback, panic, compiler error, or failing log and asks what it means, why it happens, or how to fix it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
peopleforresterSkillrefactoring-guide
Safe refactoring patterns and techniques. Use when the user wants to improve code structure, reduce duplication, or make code more maintainable without changing behavior. Emphasizes incremental changes with test coverage.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from vishalsachdev
Other versions37 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 37
- serejaris/personal-corp-os★ 243same name
- serejaris/ris-claude-code★ 243same name
- dmccreary/claude-skills★ 110same name
- dmccreary/ibook-skills★ 110same name
- anchildress1/awesome-ai★ 67same name
- anchildress1/awesome-github-copilot★ 67same name
- MCDxAI/minecraft-dev-mcp★ 47same name
- geekjourneyx/readme-generator★ 44same name
- glincker/claude-code-marketplace★ 37same name
- johnqtcg/awesome-skills★ 30same name
27 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- api-designerSkill
- bug-report-formatterSkill
- changelog-writerSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- commit-message-writerSkill
- dependency-upgraderSkill
- dockerfile-doctorSkill
- env-var-auditorSkill
- error-message-improverSkill
- migration-plannerSkill
- pr-description-writerSkill
- regex-builderSkill
- sql-query-expertSkill
- test-generatorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 31 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 84
Real install command first: Don't bury the install behind 3 paragraphs of context.
- Distinctive: line 85
Working examples: Every code block should be runnable as-is.
- Distinctive: line 92
If the user just says "write a README for my project", ask for:
- Very specific: line 100
If you have access to the codebase (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, etc.), infer as much as possible before asking.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 31 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
README Generator
You write README files that get a new user from "what is this" to "I'm using it" in under two minutes.
Standard structure
# <Project Name>
<One-sentence tagline that explains what this is.>
[badges: build, version, license, downloads]
<2-3 sentence elevator pitch — problem solved + who it's for>
## Features
- Bullet 1
- Bullet 2
- Bullet 3
## Installation
\`\`\`bash
<one command if possible>
\`\`\`
## Quick start
\`\`\`<lang>
<minimal working example, 5-15 lines>
\`\`\`
## Usage
<more examples covering the main use cases>
## Configuration
<env vars / config file / CLI flags — only if applicable>
## API reference
<for libraries — link to full docs if they exist>
## Development
\`\`\`bash
git clone ...
<install deps>
<run tests>
<run dev server>
\`\`\`
## Contributing
See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md).
## License
<License name> — see [LICENSE](LICENSE).Section selection by project type
| Type | Must-have sections |
| CLI tool | Install, Usage (with command examples), Flags/options, Examples |
| Library / SDK | Install, Quick start, API reference, Examples |
| Web app | Screenshot, Features, Install/Run, Configuration, Tech stack |
| Service / API | Endpoints summary, Auth, Quick start, Deployment, Health checks |
| Framework / template | What's included, Quick start, Project structure, Customization |
Rules
- Tagline first. The first line after the title should answer "what is this" — not history, not motivation, not badges.
- Show, don't tell. Code examples beat prose. If you can demo it in 5 lines, do that instead of describing it.
- No empty sections. Skip "Roadmap" if there isn't one. No "TODO" placeholders.
- Real install command first. Don't bury the install behind 3 paragraphs of context.
- Working examples. Every code block should be runnable as-is.
- Link, don't duplicate. Long docs go in
docs/. The README is the front door, not the manual. - Badges in moderation. Build status + version + license is enough. 12 badges = noise.
- Match the tone of the project — playful for hobby projects, terse and clinical for enterprise tooling.
What to ask before writing
If the user just says "write a README for my project", ask for:
- Project name and one-line description
- Project type (CLI / library / app / service / other)
- Primary language and install method
- One usage example (or the entry-point file so you can infer it)
- License
If you have access to the codebase (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, etc.), infer as much as possible before asking.
Output
Produce the full README in a single fenced markdown code block, ready to save as README.md. Below it, list any sections you skipped and why, and any TODOs the user needs to fill in (screenshots, demo URLs, etc.).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

