rust-pro
Skill9 starsChanged 46 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Create and review Rust 1.75+ systems code with ownership-safe async patterns and production error handling. Use when building or debugging Rust services that need performance and reliability.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dmoreq/agent-grimoiretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sid-lakhani/agents-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- xfstudio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- vudovn/ag-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- vudovn/antigravity-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- 4gentic/obelustheir own version, first seen Apr 28, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use intelligent-routing, nextjs-react-expert and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SKB3002Skillintelligent-routing
Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
Also in 5 projects that use this
SKB3002Skillnextjs-react-expert
React and Next.js performance optimization from Vercel Engineering. Use when building React components, optimizing performance, eliminating waterfalls, reducing bundle size, reviewing code for performance issues, or implementing server/client-side optimizations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jornalistainclusivoSkilldesign-spec
How to author a DESIGN.md file — the machine-readable design-token + human-rationale format that must exist before any UI is built. YAML front-matter token schema (colors, typography, spacing, rounded, components), type system, token references, and canonical section order.
Also in 3 projects that use this
zzfancitizenSkillverify-changes
Verify code changes do not break the project by running tests, linter checks, and import validation. Use after making any code changes, editing Python files, modifying imports, updating dependencies, or refactoring.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- xfstudio/skills★ 9same name
- 4gentic/obelus★ 8same name
- SKB3002/agenthub★ 4same name
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2same name
- ronrefael/sonde★ 2same name
- sid-lakhani/agents-config★ 2same name
- jornalistainclusivo/jinc-skills★ 1same name
- dmoreq/agent-grimoire★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository93 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- artifacts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Infrastructure/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- logs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Plugins/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills-system/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Wiki/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- SKILL.mdSkill
- agents-mdSkill
- alignment-checkpointSkill
- autofixSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- autoreviewSkill
- bash-hygieneSkill
- biome-lintingSkill
- bootstrapSkill
- code-fixes-triageSkill
- codex-agent-creatorSkill
- codex-automation-architectSkill
- codex-environment-creatorSkill
- codex-hooks-builderSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- coding-harnessSkill
- context7Skill
- decide-build-primitiveSkill
- diagram-cliSkill
- elixir-proSkill
- evals-routerSkill
- fix-miseSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- goal-governorSkill
- goSkill
- improve-agent-nativeSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- insight-reportSkill
- javascript-proSkill
- keep-codex-fastSkill
- npm-releaseSkill
- pnpm-managerSkill
- prek-proSkill
- pr-green-sweepSkill
- production-deploymentSkill
- project-brainSkill
- sdk-scenario-generatorSkill
- session-workflow-minerSkill
- simplifySkill
- skill-pr-deliverySkill
- technical-writerSkill
- testingSkill
- tomlSkill
- triageSkill
- typescriptSkill
- ubiquitous-languageSkill
- unslopifySkill
- user-documentationSkill
- uv-python-project-setupSkill
- valeSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈12
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Use for Rust implementation or review work.
- Distinctive: line 22
Use when correctness, safety, and performance all matter.
- Distinctive: line 38
Prefer borrowing over cloning in hot paths.
- Distinctive: line 39
Use iterators before indexing loops when possible.
- Distinctive: line 40
Keep lifetimes implicit unless explicit annotations improve clarity.
- Very specific: line 44
Prefer Result<T, E> for recoverable paths.
- Distinctive: line 45
Use domain-specific error enums over stringly-typed errors.
- Distinctive: line 58
If ownership requirements conflict, favor correctness and simplify data flow.
- Distinctive: line 77
Keep guidance deterministic so repeated runs produce consistent decisions.
- Distinctive: line 87
Run the relevant local checks for touched files and workflow contracts.
- Distinctive: line 94
Do not expand scope beyond the request unless explicitly asked.
- Distinctive: line 95
Prefer safe, reversible edits over broad refactors.
- Distinctive: line 106
Read when: the task needs advanced edge cases, migration-safe patterns, or runtime-specific nuance beyond the core checklist.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Table of Contents
- When to use
- Required inputs
- Deliverables
- Ownership Rules
- Error Handling
- Examples
- Failure mode
- Gotchas
When to use
- Use for Rust implementation or review work.
- Use when correctness, safety, and performance all matter.
Required inputs
- Target crate/module.
- Borrowing/ownership constraints.
- Error semantics and runtime expectations.
Deliverables
- Safe and idiomatic Rust updates.
- Explicit error propagation.
- Notes on any performance-sensitive decisions.
Ownership Rules
- Prefer borrowing over cloning in hot paths.
- Use iterators before indexing loops when possible.
- Keep lifetimes implicit unless explicit annotations improve clarity.
Error Handling
- Prefer
Result<T, E>for recoverable paths. - Use domain-specific error enums over stringly-typed errors.
- Attach context when propagating errors.
Examples
pub fn parse_port(value: &str) -> Result<u16, String> {
value.parse::<u16>().map_err(|_| format!("invalid port: {value}"))
}Failure mode
- If ownership requirements conflict, favor correctness and simplify data flow.
Gotchas
- Overusing
clone()can hide unnecessary allocations.
See Also
| Skill | When to use |
| [[go]] | Systems programming with similar error-handling and concurrency patterns |
| [[he-fix-bugs]] | Triage Rust ownership and borrow-checker errors with evidence-first diagnosis |
Topic map: [[agent-ops]]
Philosophy
- Optimize for clear, verifiable outcomes with the minimum necessary changes.
- Keep guidance deterministic so repeated runs produce consistent decisions.
Procedure
- Confirm scope, constraints, and required inputs before edits.
- Apply focused changes tied directly to the requested outcome.
- Re-run the highest-signal validations and capture concrete evidence.
Validation
- Run the relevant local checks for touched files and workflow contracts.
- Fail fast: stop at the first blocking validation failure and report exact evidence.
- Re-run checks after fixes and record residual risk if any remains.
Constraints
- Redact secrets, tokens, credentials, and sensitive data by default.
- Do not expand scope beyond the request unless explicitly asked.
- Prefer safe, reversible edits over broad refactors.
Anti-patterns
- Skipping validation after making changes.
- Applying broad refactors to solve narrow issues.
- Assuming behavior without evidence from current checks.
References and assets
- Open deep guidance:
Infrastructure/references/deep-guidance.md - Read when: the task needs advanced edge cases, migration-safe patterns, or runtime-specific nuance beyond the core checklist.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

