elixir-pro
Skill9 starsChanged 46 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Create and review idiomatic Elixir code with OTP patterns, supervision trees, and Phoenix LiveView. Use when building or debugging Elixir services that need reliable concurrency and fault tolerance.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xfstudio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ai4brands-design/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 22, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- xfstudio/skills★ 9same name
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository93 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- artifacts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Infrastructure/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- logs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Plugins/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills-system/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- Wiki/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- SKILL.mdSkill
- agents-mdSkill
- alignment-checkpointSkill
- autofixSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- autoreviewSkill
- bash-hygieneSkill
- biome-lintingSkill
- bootstrapSkill
- code-fixes-triageSkill
- codex-agent-creatorSkill
- codex-automation-architectSkill
- codex-environment-creatorSkill
- codex-hooks-builderSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- coding-harnessSkill
- context7Skill
- decide-build-primitiveSkill
- diagram-cliSkill
- evals-routerSkill
- fix-miseSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- goal-governorSkill
- goSkill
- improve-agent-nativeSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- insight-reportSkill
- javascript-proSkill
- keep-codex-fastSkill
- npm-releaseSkill
- pnpm-managerSkill
- prek-proSkill
- pr-green-sweepSkill
- production-deploymentSkill
- project-brainSkill
- rust-proSkill
- sdk-scenario-generatorSkill
- session-workflow-minerSkill
- simplifySkill
- skill-pr-deliverySkill
- technical-writerSkill
- testingSkill
- tomlSkill
- triageSkill
- typescriptSkill
- ubiquitous-languageSkill
- unslopifySkill
- user-documentationSkill
- uv-python-project-setupSkill
- valeSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈12
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Use for Elixir/OTP implementation and review work.
- Distinctive: line 22
Use when fault tolerance or process boundaries are central.
- Distinctive: line 38
Keep supervision trees explicit and shallow.
- Distinctive: line 40
Prefer pure modules for domain logic outside process boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 45
Use pattern matching to make invalid states impossible.
- Distinctive: line 46
Keep message protocols explicit and documented.
- Distinctive: line 63
If supervision strategy is unclear, hold structural changes and confirm intent.
- Distinctive: line 82
Keep guidance deterministic so repeated runs produce consistent decisions.
- Distinctive: line 92
Run the relevant local checks for touched files and workflow contracts.
- Distinctive: line 99
Do not expand scope beyond the request unless explicitly asked.
- Distinctive: line 100
Prefer safe, reversible edits over broad refactors.
- Distinctive: line 111
Read when: the task needs advanced edge cases, migration-safe patterns, or runtime-specific nuance beyond the core checklist.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Table of Contents
- When to use
- Required inputs
- Deliverables
- OTP Structure
- Reliability
- Examples
- Failure mode
- Gotchas
When to use
- Use for Elixir/OTP implementation and review work.
- Use when fault tolerance or process boundaries are central.
Required inputs
- App context and supervision tree scope.
- Expected process lifecycle behavior.
- Error and retry expectations.
Deliverables
- Idiomatic Elixir updates.
- Clear OTP process boundaries.
- Explicit reliability notes when behavior changes.
OTP Structure
- Keep supervision trees explicit and shallow.
- Model long-lived state with GenServer only when state is required.
- Prefer pure modules for domain logic outside process boundaries.
Reliability
- Let supervisors restart failed workers.
- Use pattern matching to make invalid states impossible.
- Keep message protocols explicit and documented.
Examples
defmodule PortParser do
def parse(value) do
case Integer.parse(value) do
{port, ""} when port > 0 -> {:ok, port}
_ -> {:error, :invalid_port}
end
end
endFailure mode
- If supervision strategy is unclear, hold structural changes and confirm intent.
Gotchas
- Process state mutations without clear ownership cause flaky behavior.
See Also
| Skill | When to use |
| [[rust-pro]] | Systems-level concurrency patterns that share OTP-style supervision thinking |
| [[he-fix-bugs]] | Triage distributed process failures with evidence-first diagnosis |
Topic map: [[agent-ops]]
Philosophy
- Optimize for clear, verifiable outcomes with the minimum necessary changes.
- Keep guidance deterministic so repeated runs produce consistent decisions.
Procedure
- Confirm scope, constraints, and required inputs before edits.
- Apply focused changes tied directly to the requested outcome.
- Re-run the highest-signal validations and capture concrete evidence.
Validation
- Run the relevant local checks for touched files and workflow contracts.
- Fail fast: stop at the first blocking validation failure and report exact evidence.
- Re-run checks after fixes and record residual risk if any remains.
Constraints
- Redact secrets, tokens, credentials, and sensitive data by default.
- Do not expand scope beyond the request unless explicitly asked.
- Prefer safe, reversible edits over broad refactors.
Anti-patterns
- Skipping validation after making changes.
- Applying broad refactors to solve narrow issues.
- Assuming behavior without evidence from current checks.
References and assets
- Open deep guidance:
Infrastructure/references/deep-guidance.md - Read when: the task needs advanced edge cases, migration-safe patterns, or runtime-specific nuance beyond the core checklist.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

