using-the-harness
Skill13 starsChanged 27 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Session-start orientation for this team harness. Load first, before any work. Explains the operating contract, when each skill triggers, and how installed companion plugins supply agent-craft capabilities while this harness supplies the team contract. Trigger at the start of every session and whenever unsure which skill applies.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adk-expertSkill
- adversarial-gateSkill
- cloud-checkupSkill
- cloud-expertSkill
- cost-guardrailSkill
- cxo-oversightSkill
- delivery-orchestratorSkill
- domain-validatorSkill
- frontend-performance-auditSkill
- get-it-doneSkill
- github-managerSkill
- governance-guardrailSkill
- mcp-server-scaffoldSkill
- operating-model-bootstrapSkill
- plugin-submissionSkill
- product-ownerSkill
- pr-reviewerSkill
- release-managerSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- sitrepSkill
- spec-first-deliverySkill
- system-performance-guardrailSkill
- test-strategySkill
- the-architectSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Ground in the contract: If this project has adopted the operating model, read its project profile before anything else …
- Very specific: line 26
Route before doing: Check the routing table below.
- Distinctive: line 96
No companion installed? The baseline skills above are the fallback.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Using the Harness
This is a team operating harness: one shared contract for humans and AI agents working in the same repository — same rules, same risk tiers, same evidence, same definition of done. It exists to make a mixed human–AI team coherent, not to make one agent faster.
A skill supplies a repeatable procedure. It never supplies permission or accountability.
First actions, every session
- Ground in the contract. If this project has adopted the operating model, read its
project profile before anything else (
docs/operating-model/PROJECT-OPERATING-PROFILE.md), then the manual it binds. Load the mapped delivery workflow, current STATUS, ROADMAP and any applicable checkpoint before planning. Check dates and executable commands against current evidence; a stale profile is a finding, not a fact to silently preserve. Hooks provide orientation, not proof that these reads happened. - Classify risk before acting. Map the requested work to R0–R3. Round ambiguity upward. Confirm authority at that tier before any consequential, destructive, external, or credential-touching action.
- Route before doing. Check the routing table below. If a skill applies to the
work, use it. If you are unsure which applies, use
delivery-orchestrator.
The shared plugin is provider-neutral. Host adapters implement invocation; the project profile selects authorised reviewers, subscriptions and budgets. Independent Council review is a capability, not a fixed roster. See the review contract.
Installation and project adoption
A user-level installation makes the skills available across that user’s projects; a
project installation shares a selected baseline with collaborators. Neither creates
project authority. Use the host’s selected skill location, including bundled references
and scripts, without assuming a copied .agents/skills/ directory.
For a new adoption, route to operating-model-bootstrap from the consumer project.
Ground its project-owned vision, workflow and profile: ticket system, owners, model
selection, executable checks, review, release and observation. Existing records and
explicit operator authority take precedence. Load detailed skills when needed; an
unadopted project needs orientation and an adoption path, not the full delivery process.
Core invariants — not negotiable
- Classify risk before confirming authority. Approval is scoped to actual risk.
- Infer intent; never infer permission. Useful intent is not a grant of authority.
- Receipts, not polish. Produce an artefact or a pass/fail verdict, not a narrative.
- Review binds to the exact candidate. Any change after review invalidates it.
seedis notactive. A seed profile supports design and R0/R1 work only.- Never invent a project fact. Unknowns get an owner and a resolving trigger.
- Insufficient evidence is a stop, not a prompt to improvise. Tag the roster role that owns the decision; silence never converts to permission.
Skill routing
| Work in front of you | Skill |
| New repo, or operating model install/repair | operating-model-bootstrap |
| Multi-track epic, or "which skill applies?" | delivery-orchestrator |
| An agreed goal to drive to a working, merged outcome while the operator is away | get-it-done |
| The machine is slow, tests or browser skills left processes behind | system-performance-guardrail |
| Is everything live, any errors this week, the weekly SRE checkup of a GCP project | cloud-checkup |
| Is the page fast enough, Core Web Vitals, why is this route slow | frontend-performance-audit |
| Vision, requirements, user journeys and product acceptance | product-owner |
| Material strategic, cost/risk or operating ownership decision | cxo-oversight |
| Acceptance coverage and executable user-path checks | test-strategy |
| Significant technical decision or ADR | the-architect |
| New feature, epic, or change — plan before code | spec-first-delivery |
| High-stakes decision, or before claiming done | adversarial-gate |
| Agent output feeding a decision, store, or another agent | domain-validator |
| Any PR or agent-generated code before commit | pr-reviewer |
| Anything about to ship to a real environment | release-readiness |
| CI triggers, Actions billing, issues, labels, branch protection, or release-tag workflow | github-manager |
| Release process governance: SemVer, ADR, changelog, release authority | release-manager |
| Enterprise policy, compliance, governance, or approved-vendor alignment | governance-guardrail |
| Status, standup, or situation report | sitrep |
| Plugin-directory, marketplace, or curated-list submission | plugin-submission |
| LLM/cloud cost estimate or architecture with LLM calls | cost-guardrail |
| Google ADK multi-agent design | adk-expert |
| Any cloud-vendor workload (GCP, AWS, Azure, Alibaba Cloud) | cloud-expert (the-architect routes) |
| Adding or reviewing an MCP server | mcp-server-scaffold |
Companion plugins
Agent-craft capabilities may be provided by installed companion plugins instead of these
skills — see INTEGRATIONS.md for the evaluated map (simplicity discipline, TDD
methodology, frontend design review, and similar craft lanes).
- Route craft work to an installed companion when the project profile names one as the provider. Do not re-implement a capability an installed companion already provides.
- Companions supply capability, never authority. This harness's risk tiers, evidence, and review gates still apply to their output.
- No companion installed? The baseline skills above are the fallback. Record the equivalent and its owner in the project profile; do not silently skip the capability.
Harness tool mapping
Skills name actions, not tools. The per-harness translation lives outside the canonical skill bodies:
- Antigravity (Gemini) — read
references/antigravity-tools.md(in this skill's directory) before acting; it maps subagent dispatch, task tracking, and file/search actions to Antigravity's native tools. - Kimi Code — the plugin manifest's
skillInstructionscarry the mapping. - Claude Code / Codex — the skills' action vocabulary resolves to the native tools of the same names.
Anti-rationalization table
| Excuse the agent makes | Counter |
| "The skills are just docs — I can skip them" | The skills are the harness. Skipping them is running without the contract. |
| "This task is too small for a skill" | Gates are proportional to risk — R0/R1 is cheap. Skipped small gates are where big failures rehearse. |
| "The companion plugin handles quality" | Companions own craft. Authority, evidence, and completion semantics stay here. |
| "I'll edit the skill body to fit my tools" | Porting adds a thin adapter or tool mapping. Canonical skill bodies never change per harness. |
| "I remember the contract from earlier" | Sessions compact and clear. Re-ground in the tracked profile; memory is not the contract. |
| "The user seems in a hurry" | Speed is easy. Safe speed is engineered. Hurry raises risk tier, it does not lower it. |
When unsure
Route through delivery-orchestrator. Record every unresolved fact with an owner and
the trigger that resolves it. Stop before any R2/R3 mutation or external action that
lacks explicit authority and runnable controls.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

