agentleFS
jpantsjohajpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience/skills/release-readiness/SKILL.md

release-readiness

Skill13 starsChanged 27 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Go / no-go gate before any deployment. Checks failure modes, rollback plan, cost, production bar, and definition of done. Trigger before releasing to any environment that carries real consequences.

48 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use dependency-cve-sweep, fleet-standard-adoption and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • berntpoppSkill

    dependency-cve-sweep

    Use when handling Dependabot PRs, CodeQL/Trivy alerts, or doing a routine dependency/CVE sweep for this repo.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • berntpoppSkill

    fleet-standard-adoption

    Use when bringing this repo into compliance with a GeneFoundry fleet standard (tool-naming, response-envelope, container-hardening, versioning, MCP transport, or logging) or closing its tracking issue.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • IgorGanapolskySkill

    ci-failure-triage

    Triage a CI / PR check failure by READING the failure body before forming any hypothesis. Triggered whenever a required check is red, a PR is BLOCKED, a merge won't land, or you're about to call a failure "transient", "flaky", "stale", or "orphaned". Prevents dismissing a real failure (e.g. real CodeQL security alerts) as noise.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • VersoXBTSkill

    code-quality-review

    Perform structured code reviews enforcing quality standards, naming conventions, architecture patterns, and team agreements. Use when the user says 'review this code', 'code review', 'check quality', 'review my PR', 'what's wrong with this', 'improve this code', 'review before merge', 'peer review', or 'audit this'. Also triggers on 'code quality', 'review standards', 'enforce conventions', 'tech debt check', 'lint review', or when user completes a significant code change.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • ffsshhttiikkSkill

    unit-testing

    Unit testing best practices and patterns

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    security-review

    Finds exploitable application security vulnerabilities in code changes. Use for Warden security scans, appsec review, OWASP-style checks, authentication or authorization bugs, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, secrets, unsafe crypto, webhook verification, open redirects, or sensitive data exposure.

    Also in 17 projects that use this

  • +2 more from berntpopp

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 47 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before deploying to staging or production

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Before handing a system to another team

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Before declaring a sprint or milestone complete

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    When someone says "it works on my machine"

    line 17
  5. Distinctive:

    No outstanding HIGH or CRITICAL findings from security scan

    line 34

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 47 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Release Readiness

A working demo is not evidence of production readiness. Production readiness is proven through sustained operation, incident handling, cost predictability, and controlled evolution.

This skill enforces the production bar. It produces a go / no-go verdict with a signed checklist. No checklist = no go.

When to use

  • Before deploying to staging or production
  • Before handing a system to another team
  • Before declaring a sprint or milestone complete
  • When someone says "it works on my machine"

Procedure

  1. Validate the definition of done — confirm that acceptance criteria from the spec are met. "Looks good" is not a criterion. Run the actual validation commands.
  2. Check all quality gates pass under the approved release ADR and profile. Require candidate/artifact-bound receipts from the declared executor; a hosted CI outage never permits silently dropping a gate. Run the release structural preflight after the artifact exists and before promotion, then independently verify its receipts. Structural PASS neither authenticates approvals nor proves test outcomes. The commands below are defaults; use the project's declared equivalents:
    • make lint — style and static analysis clean
    • make typecheck — no type errors
    • make test — unit tests green
    • make e2e — end-to-end tests green (or equivalent for your stack)
    • No outstanding HIGH or CRITICAL findings from security scan
  3. Name the failure modes — at minimum:
    • What happens if the service is unavailable?
    • What happens under unexpected load?
    • What happens if a dependency (external API, database, queue) is degraded?
    • What is the data-loss risk?
  4. Confirm rollback exists and is tested — a rollback plan that has never been tested is not a rollback plan. If the rollback has not been exercised, flag it.
  5. Estimate cost impact — LLM calls, storage writes, egress, third-party API calls. Any unbounded cost vector must be capped or accepted explicitly.
  6. Confirm planned service acceptance — verify applicable receiving-owner acceptance, support and knowledge-transfer evidence from the planning prerequisites. A document existing is not proof that the receiving team can operate the service.
  7. Confirm monitoring and alerting — what fires when this breaks? Who gets the alert? What is the on-call runbook?
  8. Check data boundaries — does the release touch PII, regulated data, or cross a tenant boundary? If yes, confirm the appropriate controls are in place.
  9. Sign off — record: who reviewed, what was checked, what was accepted as known risk, and the go/no-go verdict.

Outputs

  • Signed release checklist (append to PR or release doc)
  • Go / no-go verdict
  • List of accepted known risks with named owners

Guardrails

  • No go without a rollback plan. "We'll figure it out" is not a rollback.
  • Passing declared gates is necessary, not sufficient. Release readiness also checks failure modes, authority, artifact identity and observation in either mode.
  • Cost estimates are not optional. An unbounded LLM call in a hot path is a production incident waiting to happen.
  • Monitoring must exist before go-live, not after. "We'll add monitoring later" means the first incident is invisible.

Anti-rationalization table

ExcuseCounter
"CI is green, we're good to go"CI checks known paths. Release readiness checks failure modes CI doesn't cover.
"We'll monitor it after launch"The first failure will be invisible. Add monitoring before go-live.
"Rollback is just redeploy the previous version"Untested. Run the rollback in staging first.
"Cost is fine, it's low traffic"Low traffic + an LLM loop bug = runaway spend. Cap it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.