roadmap-execution
Skill628 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Plan and execute repository product work through docs/ROADMAP.md. Use this before starting features, refactors, optimization programs, or other work with multiple deliverables. Add ordered checkboxes first, execute from top to bottom, and mark only verified work complete.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Read docs/ROADMAP.md and locate the active queue.
- Very specific: line 18
Add the requested outcome, implementation work, tests, documentation, and acceptance criteria as ordered - [ ] items before changing code.
- Distinctive: line 20
Put dependencies before dependents.
- Distinctive: line 23
Create or update GitHub issues for ownership and execution when appropriate.
- Very specific: line 29
Discovered bugs always go on the roadmap: If I find a defect, an overclaim ([x] for work that is only a C API, a REPL special-case, a …
- Distinctive: line 40
Do not skip a difficult item to implement a more visible dependent feature.
- Distinctive: line 41
Add newly discovered required work at the correct dependency position, not automatically at the bottom.
- Distinctive: line 43
Keep checkboxes concrete and verifiable.
- Very specific: line 46
Keep docs/ROADMAP.md in my first-person voice.
- Very specific: line 54
Before ending the session, update roadmap state, update the corresponding GitHub issue, and follow skills/session-completion/SKILL.md.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Roadmap Execution
docs/ROADMAP.md is my product execution order. GitHub Issues is my task ledger. They
serve different purposes and I keep both consistent.
Before Implementation
- Read
docs/ROADMAP.mdand locate the active queue. - Add the requested outcome, implementation work, tests, documentation, and
acceptance criteria as ordered
- [ ]items before changing code. - Put dependencies before dependents. Put measurement before optimization and semantic foundations before surface features.
- Mark an existing item
- [x]only when repository evidence verifies it. - Create or update GitHub issues for ownership and execution when appropriate.
Small fixes that restore already documented behavior may use an existing roadmap item. If no item describes the work, add one first. Do not turn every typo into a new phase; use the smallest accurate checkbox.
Discovered bugs always go on the roadmap. If I find a defect, an overclaim
([x] for work that is only a C API, a REPL special-case, a layout mismatch),
or required work during a session, I add a concrete checkbox in
docs/ROADMAP.md at the correct dependency position before I continue. I do
not leave defects in chat-only notes. A defect I already fixed in the same
session still gets an [x] item so it stays in product history. I file or
update a GitHub issue for ownership. Chat is not the ledger.
During Implementation
- Execute the first unchecked active item whose dependencies are complete.
- Do not skip a difficult item to implement a more visible dependent feature.
- Add newly discovered required work at the correct dependency position, not automatically at the bottom.
- Keep checkboxes concrete and verifiable. Avoid entries such as "improve performance" without workloads and acceptance evidence.
- Distinguish measured facts, tested behavior, formal proof, and assumptions.
- Keep
docs/ROADMAP.mdin my first-person voice.
Completing Items
An item becomes - [x] only after its required code, tests, quality gates, and
documentation are complete. A partial implementation stays unchecked or is
split into smaller honest items.
Before ending the session, update roadmap state, update the corresponding GitHub
issue, and follow skills/session-completion/SKILL.md.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/code-quality/RULE.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/file-organization/RULE.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/testing-standards/RULE.mdCursor rule
- github-issue-trackingSkill
- nanovm-opcode-debuggingSkill
- reading-nanolangSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- releasing-documentationSkill
- releasing-presentationSkill
- releasingSkill
- session-completionSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

