book-genesis
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to create, plan, draft, evaluate, revise, package, or run a complete AI-assisted book pipeline. Book Genesis turns a one-line idea into a book project with intake, foundation, architecture, drafting, adversarial audit, Genesis Score, and editorial package artifacts.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4their own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-studio★ 159same name
- felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4★ 159same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- beta-readerSkill
- book-bestseller-studioSkill
- book-editorSkill
- book-genesis-coreSkill
- book-genesis-fullSkill
- book-researcherSkill
- book-swarm-panelSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- chaos-engineSkill
- dialogue-polishSkill
- hook-craftSkill
- mechanical-preprocessSkill
- quality-gateSkill
- editorial-packageSkill
- humanizer-proSkill
- literary-agent-panelSkill
- manuscript-managerSkill
- narrative-foundationSkill
- book-autoSkill
- continuity-guardianSkill
- entity-trackerSkill
- reader-personaSkill
- voice-fingerprintSkill
- production-prepSkill
- prose-craftSkill
- series-architectSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈13
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use this skill for:
- Very specific: line 19
Do not use the legacy V4 17-phase workflow as the default.
- Distinctive: line 30
If no explicit short-form positioning exists, default to full-length commercial book standards.
- Very specific: line 58
Use references/pipeline/phases.md for the compact phase overview.
- Distinctive: line 62
Read only the prompt for the active phase:
- Very specific: line 78
Read PROJECT_STATE.yaml if it exists.
- Very specific: line 79
Read ASSUMPTIONS.md if it exists.
- Very specific: line 88
Update PROJECT_STATE.yaml after every phase, chapter block, audit, or score.
- Distinctive: line 92
Do not skip Phase 4. Audit before final scoring.
- Very specific: line 93
When drafting, write in chapter files under manuscript/chapters/ and keep the state synchronized.
- Distinctive: line 94
When user feedback changes direction, record it in project files before continuing.
- Distinctive: line 95
If the user asks to break a quality threshold such as 8.5, activate the Literary Barrier loop after the adversarial audit and keep …
- Very specific: line 96
If the manuscript is below target_floor_words, run expansion/re-architecture before any final score or editorial package claims publication …
- Distinctive: line 100
Prefer fewer constraints during drafting.
- Distinctive: line 102
Use the Genesis Score floor principle: the book is only as strong as its weakest major dimension.
- Distinctive: line 103
Treat internal literary scores as inflated until calibrated.
- Distinctive: line 104
Do not optimize prose to satisfy rubrics while drafting.
- Distinctive: line 106
If a task is only editing, scoring, or packaging an existing manuscript, start from the matching phase instead of forcing a full restart.
- Distinctive: line 107
Do not let literary quality hide product incompleteness.
- Distinctive: line 112
Use these only when relevant and already available:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Book Genesis
Book Genesis is Felipe's local book-production pipeline adapted for Codex. It uses the newer book-genesis-core core as the canonical workflow.
Use this skill for:
- fiction, memoir, nonfiction, or hybrid book projects
- turning a rough idea into a structured book
- drafting full manuscripts chapter by chapter
- auditing AI-written prose and narrative structure
- producing Genesis Score evaluations
- creating synopses, cover briefs, launch/editorial packages, and formatting handoff notes
Do not use the legacy V4 17-phase workflow as the default. It is copied only for historical reference in references/legacy-v4-book-genesis.md.
Core Rule
Persist important decisions to files. A Book Genesis run should leave a durable project tree, not just chat output.
Commercial-length is a hard contract, not a preference. A manuscript cannot be called complete, final-scored as publication-ready, or packaged for a bestseller/public launch unless it either:
- meets the genre/audience
target_floor_wordsrecorded inPROJECT_STATE.yaml, or - is explicitly positioned from intake as a novella, short novel, or serial installment.
If no explicit short-form positioning exists, default to full-length commercial book standards.
Default project layout:
<project>/
PROJECT_STATE.yaml
ASSUMPTIONS.md
artifacts/
manuscript/
chapters/
evaluations/
delivery/Canonical Pipeline
Load references/pipeline/manifest.yaml before starting or advancing phases.
- Phase 0: Intake
- Phase 1: Foundation
- Phase 2: Architecture
- Phase 3: Drafting
- Phase 4: Adversarial Audit
- Phase 5: Literary Barrier Revision Loop
- Phase 6: Final Score
- Phase 7: Editorial Package
Use references/pipeline/phases.md for the compact phase overview.
Phase References
Read only the prompt for the active phase:
- Intake:
references/prompts/intake.md - Foundation:
references/prompts/foundation.md - Architecture:
references/prompts/architecture.md - Drafting:
references/prompts/drafting.md - Adversarial Audit:
references/prompts/adversarial-audit.md - Literary Barrier Revision Loop:
references/prompts/literary-barrier-loop.md - Final Score:
references/scoring/genesis-score.md - Editorial Package:
references/prompts/editorial-package.md
references/prompts/orchestrator.md contains the portable orchestration rules.
Operating Loop
- Identify or create the project directory.
- Read
PROJECT_STATE.yamlif it exists. If not, initialize it from the manifest phases and user idea. - Read
ASSUMPTIONS.mdif it exists. If not, create it and mark inferred assumptions clearly. - Confirm or infer the commercial-length contract before architecture or drafting:
target_range_wordstarget_floor_wordstarget_ceiling_wordspositioning: full-length novel, novella, short novel, serial, nonfiction, etc.chapter_count_plannedaverage_words_per_chapter_planned
- Load the current phase prompt and produce only that phase's required outputs.
- Update
PROJECT_STATE.yamlafter every phase, chapter block, audit, or score.- record cumulative manuscript word count
- record planned vs actual word count by chapter/block
- record whether the length gate is
PASS,FLAG, orBLOCK
- Do not skip Phase 4. Audit before final scoring.
- When drafting, write in chapter files under
manuscript/chapters/and keep the state synchronized. - When user feedback changes direction, record it in project files before continuing.
- If the user asks to break a quality threshold such as 8.5, activate the Literary Barrier loop after the adversarial audit and keep iterating until the calibrated critical score clears the threshold or the blocker is documented as requiring human/editorial input.
- If the manuscript is below
target_floor_words, run expansion/re-architecture before any final score or editorial package claims publication readiness.
Quality Policy
- Prefer fewer constraints during drafting; evaluate and repair afterward.
- Separate drafting, audit, scoring, and editorial judgment in the workflow.
- Use the Genesis Score floor principle: the book is only as strong as its weakest major dimension.
- Treat internal literary scores as inflated until calibrated. Apply the score calibration rules in the scoring reference before claiming a threshold was reached.
- Do not optimize prose to satisfy rubrics while drafting. The writer writes; the critic and editor operate after text exists.
- For Portuguese books, write artifacts and prose in Portuguese unless the user requests otherwise.
- If a task is only editing, scoring, or packaging an existing manuscript, start from the matching phase instead of forcing a full restart.
- Do not let literary quality hide product incompleteness. A brilliant 46k-word draft is not a full-length adult thriller unless the project explicitly chose short-form positioning.
- Bestseller/public-launch readiness requires both craft strength and product fit: length, package, target reader, cover/copy, metadata, and launch plan.
Complementary Skills
Use these only when relevant and already available:
copy-editingfor prose-level cleanupbook-swarm-panelfor MiroFish-style simulated reader swarms, niche-risk scouting, public-opinion tests, heatmaps, interviews, and revision ticketshumanizer-profor measured, register-aware de-AI rewriting (Better Humanizer; use theliteraryregister for fiction)launch-strategyorcontent-strategyfor go-to-market assetsimagegenor cover-specific workflows for cover ideation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

