agentleFS
jodyjdcjodyjdc/ultimate-best-seller-studio/AGENTS.md

ultimate-best-seller-studio

AGENTS.md2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

This repository contains Ultimate Best Seller Studio (engine codename: Book Genesis), an agent-agnostic book-production workflow made of markdown skills, manifests, prompts, scoring rules, and reference files — with a measured human-band gate powered by the Better Humanizer. When asked to create, plan, draft, audit, score, revise, or package a book, use the Universal Book Genesis Core unless the user explicitly asks for legacy V4/V5: The folder name is historical. Treat this as the current universal pipeline for Claude Code, Codex,…

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When asked to create, plan, draft, audit, score, revise, or package a book, use the Universal Book Genesis Core unless the user explicitly …

    line 7
  2. Distinctive:

    When the user asks for bestseller-level, market-ready, agent/editor-ready, or launch-ready work, layer the market umbrella skill on top of …

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    When the user asks for MiroFish-style reader swarms, public-opinion simulation, niche-risk scouting, or many simulated readers, use:

    line 21
  4. Distinctive:

    When the prose reads synthetic, fails the anti-AI scan, or needs to sit inside the real human distribution (de-AI / humanization), use the …

    line 27
  5. Very specific:

    Use the literary register for fiction.

    line 34
  6. Very specific:

    Keep PROJECT_STATE.yaml synchronized with reality.

    line 45
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not skip Phase 4: Adversarial Audit.

    line 48
  8. Distinctive:

    Do not run final scoring before the adversarial audit.

    line 49
  9. Distinctive:

    Write Portuguese artifacts and prose in Portuguese when the book is in Portuguese.

    line 50
  10. Distinctive:

    Treat legacy V4 material as historical reference unless the user asks for it.

    line 51

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Agent Instructions

This repository contains Ultimate Best Seller Studio (engine codename: Book Genesis), an agent-agnostic book-production workflow made of markdown skills, manifests, prompts, scoring rules, and reference files — with a measured human-band gate powered by the Better Humanizer.

Default Behavior

When asked to create, plan, draft, audit, score, revise, or package a book, use the Universal Book Genesis Core unless the user explicitly asks for legacy V4/V5:

skills/book-genesis-core/SKILL.md

The folder name is historical. Treat this as the current universal pipeline for Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Kimi, and other file-aware agents.

When the user asks for bestseller-level, market-ready, agent/editor-ready, or launch-ready work, layer the market umbrella skill on top of the universal core:

skills/book-bestseller-studio/SKILL.md

When the user asks for MiroFish-style reader swarms, public-opinion simulation, niche-risk scouting, or many simulated readers, use:

skills/book-swarm-panel/SKILL.md

When the prose reads synthetic, fails the anti-AI scan, or needs to sit inside the real human distribution (de-AI / humanization), use the Better Humanizer instead of the old rule-based humanizer:

skills/humanizer-pro/SKILL.md        # bridge: points at external/better-humanizer/
external/better-humanizer/            # the actual tool (git submodule, single source of truth)

Use the literary register for fiction. To gate a whole manuscript on measured human-likeness, run ubss humanize-score <project> (writes evaluations/human-band/REPORT.md). See docs/humanizer-pro-integration.md.

Load the manifest before advancing phases:

skills/book-genesis-core/references/pipeline/manifest.yaml

Rules

  • Persist important decisions to files.
  • Keep PROJECT_STATE.yaml synchronized with reality.
  • Keep ASSUMPTIONS.md explicit.
  • Load only the prompt for the active phase.
  • Do not skip Phase 4: Adversarial Audit.
  • Do not run final scoring before the adversarial audit.
  • Write Portuguese artifacts and prose in Portuguese when the book is in Portuguese.
  • Treat legacy V4 material as historical reference unless the user asks for it.

Agent-Specific Notes

  • Claude Code can run /book-genesis-core after installing the full skill folder.
  • Codex can use this repo directly through AGENTS.md and the skill folder.
  • Antigravity can use this file as the repo-level playbook.
  • Kimi can use the full skill folder or the active phase prompt plus project state files.
  • The optional local runner in runner/cli.py can scaffold projects and prepare phase packets, but it does not call a model or write literary output.

Legacy Commands

  • /book-genesis: V5 Craft Mode legacy orchestrator.
  • /book-genesis-full: full legacy production pipeline.
  • /book-genesis-core: current portable command name kept for compatibility.

Public Documentation

  • README.md: public overview and commercial positioning.
  • docs/book-genesis-core.md: universal core architecture.
  • docs/runner.md: local runner and mechanical demo.
  • docs/portability.md: Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Kimi, and generic agent usage notes.
  • docs/humanizer-pro-integration.md: the Better Humanizer integration and human-band gate.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.