agentleFS
joa23joa23/linear-cli/.claude/skills/retro/SKILL.md

retro

Skill144 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Analyze completed Linear cycles for retrospectives. Identifies velocity trends, scope creep, and patterns to improve future planning.

193 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use plan-tune, ios-clean and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    pair-agent

    Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Saqlain-811
  • +2 more from ShreyRavi

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Focus on process: - Not individual performance

    line 132
  3. Distinctive:

    Actionable items: - Every insight should have a follow-up

    line 133

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Retro Skill - Sprint Retrospective

You are an expert at analyzing completed sprints and generating actionable retrospective insights.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • A sprint/cycle has ended
  • Preparing for a retrospective meeting
  • Analyzing team performance trends

Process

  1. Gather Cycle Data
    linear cycles analyze --team ENG --count 3
    linear cycles get CYCLE-ID
  2. Analyze Completion
    • Planned vs actual completion
    • Scope changes during cycle
    • Carry-over items
  3. Identify Patterns
    • Estimation accuracy
    • Blocker frequency
    • Category distribution
  4. Generate Insights

Analysis Areas

Velocity & Completion

  • Points planned vs completed
  • Issue count planned vs completed
  • Completion rate trend

Scope Management

  • Issues added mid-cycle
  • Issues removed/deferred
  • Scope creep percentage

Blockers & Dependencies

  • Issues that were blocked
  • Average time blocked
  • Dependency-related delays

Workload Distribution

  • Points per team member
  • Completion rate by assignee
  • Bottleneck identification

Output Format

RETROSPECTIVE: Cycle 23
════════════════════════════════════════

SUMMARY
────────────────────────────────────────
Planned: 40 points (12 issues)
Completed: 34 points (10 issues)
Completion Rate: 85%

SCOPE CHANGES
────────────────────────────────────────
Added mid-cycle: 3 issues (8 pts)
Removed: 1 issue (2 pts)
Carried over: 2 issues (6 pts)
Scope creep: 15%

WHAT WENT WELL
────────────────────────────────────────
+ Auth refactor completed ahead of schedule
+ Zero critical bugs in production
+ Good collaboration on API work

WHAT COULD IMPROVE
────────────────────────────────────────
- 2 issues blocked for 3+ days (ENG-201, ENG-203)
- Underestimated ENG-205 (3pts planned, 8pts actual)
- Late scope additions disrupted focus

TRENDS (3 cycles)
────────────────────────────────────────
Velocity: 34 → 32 → 34 (stable)
Completion: 85% → 88% → 85% (stable)
Scope creep: 12% → 8% → 15% (increasing)

ACTION ITEMS
────────────────────────────────────────
1. Add buffer for complex API work
2. Daily standup check on blockers
3. Scope freeze after day 2

Commands Used

# Analyze recent cycles
linear cycles analyze --team ENG --count 3

# Get specific cycle details
linear cycles get CYCLE-23

# List cycle issues
linear issues list --team ENG --cycle CYCLE-23

# Check what was blocked
linear deps --team ENG

Discussion Questions

Generate discussion prompts for the team:

  1. Wins: What should we celebrate?
  2. Blockers: What slowed us down?
  3. Process: What would we do differently?
  4. Tools: Are there tools/automation to add?
  5. Communication: Where did we lose sync?

Best Practices

  1. Be data-driven - Base insights on actual metrics
  2. Focus on process - Not individual performance
  3. Actionable items - Every insight should have a follow-up
  4. Track over time - Compare to previous retros

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.