cycle-plan
Skill144 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Plan Linear cycles using velocity analytics. Suggests scope based on historical capacity, identifies dependency risks, balances workload.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 34
Consider focus time needs
- Very specific: line 35
Use P20/P50/P80 recommendations from analyze command
- Very specific: line 50
Start with P1/P2 issues (--priority 1 or --priority 2)
- Very specific: line 153
Use --format full for parsing output in scripts
- Very specific: line 155
Always run linear cycles analyze before planning to understand capacity
- Very specific: line 156
Use filters to narrow results: --state, --priority, --labels, --cycle, --assignee
- Distinctive: line 163
Avoid cross-cycle deps: - Don't plan work blocked by next cycle
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cycle Plan Skill - Sprint Planning
You are an expert at planning software development cycles based on team velocity.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Planning the next sprint/cycle
- Deciding what to include in a cycle
- Balancing workload across team members
Process
CRITICAL: Setup First
ALWAYS check if .linear.yaml exists. If not, run:
linear init # Select default team - REQUIRED for cycle operations- Analyze Historical Velocity
Parse the JSON to extract velocity metrics, completion rates, and recommendations.linear cycles analyze --team ENG --count 10 --format full - Review Available Capacity
- Check team size
- Account for PTO/holidays
- Consider focus time needs
- Use P20/P50/P80 recommendations from analyze command
- Get Issues for Planning
# Get backlog issues (returns ALL issues, not just assigned) linear issues list --state Backlog --format full --limit 100 # Get current cycle issues linear issues list --cycle current --format full # Get next cycle issues (if already planned) linear issues list --cycle next --format full - Select Issues for Cycle
- Start with P1/P2 issues (
--priority 1or--priority 2) - Respect dependencies (use
linear deps --team ENG) - Balance across team members
- Stay within recommended capacity
- Start with P1/P2 issues (
- Validate Plan
- Total estimates <= capacity
- No cross-cycle blockers
- Even distribution
Velocity Analysis
The linear cycles analyze command provides:
VELOCITY ANALYSIS: Team ENG (5 cycles)
════════════════════════════════════════
Average Velocity: 34 points/cycle
Completion Rate: 85%
Scope Creep: 12%
CYCLE HISTORY
────────────────────────────────────────
Cycle 23: 38 pts (92% complete)
Cycle 22: 32 pts (88% complete)
Cycle 21: 35 pts (82% complete)
Cycle 20: 28 pts (78% complete)
Cycle 19: 37 pts (90% complete)
RECOMMENDATION
────────────────────────────────────────
Target: 32-36 points for next cycle
Buffer: Reserve 10% for unplanned workPlanning Output
CYCLE PLAN: Sprint 24
════════════════════════════════════════
Capacity: 40 points (4 engineers)
Target: 36 points (90% capacity)
Buffer: 4 points for unplanned work
PLANNED ISSUES
────────────────────────────────────────
ENG-201 [P1] Auth refactor 8pts @alice
ENG-202 [P1] Payment fix 5pts @bob
ENG-203 [P2] Dashboard update 8pts @carol
ENG-204 [P2] API optimization 5pts @dave
ENG-205 [P3] Docs update 3pts @alice
ENG-206 [P3] Test coverage 5pts @bob
────────────────────────────────────────
Total: 34 points
WORKLOAD BALANCE
────────────────────────────────────────
@alice: 11 pts (28%)
@bob: 10 pts (25%)
@carol: 8 pts (20%)
@dave: 5 pts (13%)
Unassigned: 0 pts
DEPENDENCY RISKS
────────────────────────────────────────
ENG-203 blocked by ENG-201 (same cycle - OK)Commands Used
# FIRST: Ensure team context is set
linear init # If .linear.yaml doesn't exist
# Analyze velocity (ALWAYS do this first)
linear cycles analyze --team ENG --count 10 --format full
# Get backlog issues for planning (returns ALL issues, not just assigned)
linear issues list --state Backlog --format full --limit 100
# Get high priority issues
linear issues list --priority 1 --format full
# Get issues by cycle
linear issues list --cycle current --format full
linear issues list --cycle next --format full
linear issues list --cycle 65 --format full # Specific cycle number
# Filter by multiple criteria
linear issues list --state Backlog --priority 1 --labels customer --format full
# Check dependencies
linear deps --team ENG
# Assign to cycle
linear issues update ENG-201 --cycle current
linear issues update ENG-202 --cycle next
linear issues update ENG-203 --cycle 65 # Specific cycle numberKey Learnings
linear issues listreturns ALL issues (not just assigned to you)- Use
--format fullfor parsing output in scripts - Cycle numbers require team context from
linear init - Always run
linear cycles analyzebefore planning to understand capacity - Use filters to narrow results:
--state,--priority,--labels,--cycle,--assignee
Best Practices
- Leave buffer - Plan to 80-90% capacity
- Front-load blockers - Schedule blocking issues early
- Balance workload - Distribute evenly across team
- Avoid cross-cycle deps - Don't plan work blocked by next cycle
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

