security-and-hardening
Skill33 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services.
- Reads credentials
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 68 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 218
Not all audit findings require immediate action.
- Distinctive: line 241
When you defer a fix, document the reason and set a review date.
- Distinctive: line 335
No rate limiting on authentication endpoints
- Distinctive: line 341
After implementing security-relevant code:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 68 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Security and Hardening
Overview
Security-first development practices for web applications. Treat every external input as hostile, every secret as sacred, and every authorization check as mandatory. Security isn't a phase — it's a constraint on every line of code that touches user data, authentication, or external systems.
When to Use
- Building anything that accepts user input
- Implementing authentication or authorization
- Storing or transmitting sensitive data
- Integrating with external APIs or services
- Adding file uploads, webhooks, or callbacks
- Handling payment or PII data
The Three-Tier Boundary System
Always Do (No Exceptions)
- Validate all external input at the system boundary (API routes, form handlers)
- Parameterize all database queries — never concatenate user input into SQL
- Encode output to prevent XSS (use framework auto-escaping, don't bypass it)
- Use HTTPS for all external communication
- Hash passwords with bcrypt/scrypt/argon2 (never store plaintext)
- Set security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options)
- Use httpOnly, secure, sameSite cookies for sessions
- Run
npm audit(or equivalent) before every release
Ask First (Requires Human Approval)
- Adding new authentication flows or changing auth logic
- Storing new categories of sensitive data (PII, payment info)
- Adding new external service integrations
- Changing CORS configuration
- Adding file upload handlers
- Modifying rate limiting or throttling
- Granting elevated permissions or roles
Never Do
- Never commit secrets to version control (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- Never log sensitive data (passwords, tokens, full credit card numbers)
- Never trust client-side validation as a security boundary
- Never disable security headers for convenience
- Never use
eval()orinnerHTMLwith user-provided data - Never store sessions in client-accessible storage (localStorage for auth tokens)
- Never expose stack traces or internal error details to users
OWASP Top 10 Prevention
1. Injection (SQL, NoSQL, OS Command)
// BAD: SQL injection via string concatenation
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = '${userId}'`;
// GOOD: Parameterized query
const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [userId]);
// GOOD: ORM with parameterized input
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: userId } });2. Broken Authentication
// Password hashing
import { hash, compare } from 'bcrypt';
const SALT_ROUNDS = 12;
const hashedPassword = await hash(plaintext, SALT_ROUNDS);
const isValid = await compare(plaintext, hashedPassword);
// Session management
app.use(session({
secret: process.env.SESSION_SECRET, // From environment, not code
resave: false,
saveUninitialized: false,
cookie: {
httpOnly: true, // Not accessible via JavaScript
secure: true, // HTTPS only
sameSite: 'lax', // CSRF protection
maxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, // 24 hours
},
}));3. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
// BAD: Rendering user input as HTML
element.innerHTML = userInput;
// GOOD: Use framework auto-escaping (React does this by default)
return <div>{userInput}</div>;
// If you MUST render HTML, sanitize first
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput);4. Broken Access Control
// Always check authorization, not just authentication
app.patch('/api/tasks/:id', authenticate, async (req, res) => {
const task = await taskService.findById(req.params.id);
// Check that the authenticated user owns this resource
if (task.ownerId !== req.user.id) {
return res.status(403).json({
error: { code: 'FORBIDDEN', message: 'Not authorized to modify this task' }
});
}
// Proceed with update
const updated = await taskService.update(req.params.id, req.body);
return res.json(updated);
});5. Security Misconfiguration
// Security headers (use helmet for Express)
import helmet from 'helmet';
app.use(helmet());
// Content Security Policy
app.use(helmet.contentSecurityPolicy({
directives: {
defaultSrc: ["'self'"],
scriptSrc: ["'self'"],
styleSrc: ["'self'", "'unsafe-inline'"], // Tighten if possible
imgSrc: ["'self'", 'data:', 'https:'],
connectSrc: ["'self'"],
},
}));
// CORS — restrict to known origins
app.use(cors({
origin: process.env.ALLOWED_ORIGINS?.split(',') || 'http://localhost:3000',
credentials: true,
}));6. Sensitive Data Exposure
// Never return sensitive fields in API responses
function sanitizeUser(user: UserRecord): PublicUser {
const { passwordHash, resetToken, ...publicFields } = user;
return publicFields;
}
// Use environment variables for secrets
const API_KEY = process.env.STRIPE_API_KEY;
if (!API_KEY) throw new Error('STRIPE_API_KEY not configured');Input Validation Patterns
Schema Validation at Boundaries
import { z } from 'zod';
const CreateTaskSchema = z.object({
title: z.string().min(1).max(200).trim(),
description: z.string().max(2000).optional(),
priority: z.enum(['low', 'medium', 'high']).default('medium'),
dueDate: z.string().datetime().optional(),
});
// Validate at the route handler
app.post('/api/tasks', async (req, res) => {
const result = CreateTaskSchema.safeParse(req.body);
if (!result.success) {
return res.status(422).json({
error: {
code: 'VALIDATION_ERROR',
message: 'Invalid input',
details: result.error.flatten(),
},
});
}
// result.data is now typed and validated
const task = await taskService.create(result.data);
return res.status(201).json(task);
});File Upload Safety
// Restrict file types and sizes
const ALLOWED_TYPES = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/webp'];
const MAX_SIZE = 5 * 1024 * 1024; // 5MB
function validateUpload(file: UploadedFile) {
if (!ALLOWED_TYPES.includes(file.mimetype)) {
throw new ValidationError('File type not allowed');
}
if (file.size > MAX_SIZE) {
throw new ValidationError('File too large (max 5MB)');
}
// Don't trust the file extension — check magic bytes if critical
}Triaging npm audit Results
Not all audit findings require immediate action. Use this decision tree:
npm audit reports a vulnerability
├── Severity: critical or high
│ ├── Is the vulnerable code reachable in your app?
│ │ ├── YES --> Fix immediately (update, patch, or replace the dependency)
│ │ └── NO (dev-only dep, unused code path) --> Fix soon, but not a blocker
│ └── Is a fix available?
│ ├── YES --> Update to the patched version
│ └── NO --> Check for workarounds, consider replacing the dependency, or add to allowlist with a review date
├── Severity: moderate
│ ├── Reachable in production? --> Fix in the next release cycle
│ └── Dev-only? --> Fix when convenient, track in backlog
└── Severity: low
└── Track and fix during regular dependency updatesKey questions:
- Is the vulnerable function actually called in your code path?
- Is the dependency a runtime dependency or dev-only?
- Is the vulnerability exploitable given your deployment context (e.g., a server-side vulnerability in a client-only app)?
When you defer a fix, document the reason and set a review date.
Rate Limiting
import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';
// General API rate limit
app.use('/api/', rateLimit({
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
max: 100, // 100 requests per window
standardHeaders: true,
legacyHeaders: false,
}));
// Stricter limit for auth endpoints
app.use('/api/auth/', rateLimit({
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000,
max: 10, // 10 attempts per 15 minutes
}));Secrets Management
.env files:
├── .env.example → Committed (template with placeholder values)
├── .env → NOT committed (contains real secrets)
└── .env.local → NOT committed (local overrides)
.gitignore must include:
.env
.env.local
.env.*.local
*.pem
*.keyAlways check before committing:
# Check for accidentally staged secrets
git diff --cached | grep -i "password\|secret\|api_key\|token"Security Review Checklist
### Authentication
- [ ] Passwords hashed with bcrypt/scrypt/argon2 (salt rounds ≥ 12)
- [ ] Session tokens are httpOnly, secure, sameSite
- [ ] Login has rate limiting
- [ ] Password reset tokens expire
### Authorization
- [ ] Every endpoint checks user permissions
- [ ] Users can only access their own resources
- [ ] Admin actions require admin role verification
### Input
- [ ] All user input validated at the boundary
- [ ] SQL queries are parameterized
- [ ] HTML output is encoded/escaped
### Data
- [ ] No secrets in code or version control
- [ ] Sensitive fields excluded from API responses
- [ ] PII encrypted at rest (if applicable)
### Infrastructure
- [ ] Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS, etc.)
- [ ] CORS restricted to known origins
- [ ] Dependencies audited for vulnerabilities
- [ ] Error messages don't expose internalsSee Also
For detailed security checklists and pre-commit verification steps, see references/security-checklist.md.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "This is an internal tool, security doesn't matter" | Internal tools get compromised. Attackers target the weakest link. |
| "We'll add security later" | Security retrofitting is 10x harder than building it in. Add it now. |
| "No one would try to exploit this" | Automated scanners will find it. Security by obscurity is not security. |
| "The framework handles security" | Frameworks provide tools, not guarantees. You still need to use them correctly. |
| "It's just a prototype" | Prototypes become production. Security habits from day one. |
Red Flags
- User input passed directly to database queries, shell commands, or HTML rendering
- Secrets in source code or commit history
- API endpoints without authentication or authorization checks
- Missing CORS configuration or wildcard (
*) origins - No rate limiting on authentication endpoints
- Stack traces or internal errors exposed to users
- Dependencies with known critical vulnerabilities
Verification
After implementing security-relevant code:
npm auditshows no critical or high vulnerabilities- No secrets in source code or git history
- All user input validated at system boundaries
- Authentication and authorization checked on every protected endpoint
- Security headers present in response (check with browser DevTools)
- Error responses don't expose internal details
- Rate limiting active on auth endpoints
Other versions84 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 11
- shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp★ 174100% same
- Envy-7z/katalyst★ 4100% same
- huangzida/skills★ 2100% same
- Minghou-Lei/codex-skills★ 2100% same
- Puen2001/aether-os★ 2100% same
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2100% same
- ZeroTokenClaw/agents-skills★ 1100% same
- danielvogler/ai-skills-library★ 0100% same
- joshydavid/agent-j★ 0100% same
- joshydavid/flux-agent★ 0100% same
1 more not listed
Edited · 51
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 112k18% same
- penpot/penpot★ 62k53% same
- ollaya-dev/ollaya★ 1.4k18% same
- rizqinrr/viserys-agent★ 56035% same
- sampleXbro/agentsmesh★ 24100% same
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 2240% same
- JPeetz/agent-skills★ 1431% same
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 647% same
- coreplanelabs/switchboard★ 536% same
- lza6/claw-code-tingfeng★ 5100% same
41 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 22
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 46same name
- moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit★ 9same name
- ddddjaak/ae-skills★ 4same name
- dzevs/zynk★ 4same name
- fworks-tech/agenthood★ 3same name
- momentmaker/kaijutsu★ 3same name
- oleg494/coding-kit★ 3same name
- bnalwalid/walidforge-skills★ 2same name
- codexskills/agent-forge★ 2same name
- GuillemRoca/agent-skills-android★ 2same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use constraint-driven-development, doubt-driven-development and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 17 projects that use this
seikaikyoSkilldoubt-driven-development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
Also in 38 projects that use this
seikaikyoSkillinterview-me
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
Also in 35 projects that use this
jarosser06Skilltest-strategy
Plans pytest test strategies for Drift's 90%+ coverage requirement using coverage analysis, edge case identification, and test suite design. Use when determining what tests to write, analyzing coverage gaps, or planning test strategies.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillverification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Also in 9 projects that use this
OpenAISkillusing-git-worktrees
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
Also in 5 projects that use this
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ad-creativeSkill
- addyosmani-agent-skillsSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- brandkitSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- chef-assistantSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- cloud-run-basicsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- design-taste-frontend-v1Skill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- full-output-enforcementSkill
- gemini-apiSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- googlecloudplatform-knowledge-catalogSkill
- google-cloud-recipe-authSkill
- google-cloud-recipe-networking-observabilitySkill
- google-cloud-recipe-onboardingSkill
- google-cloud-waf-cost-optimizationSkill
- google-cloud-waf-reliabilitySkill
- google-cloud-waf-securitySkill
- gpt-tasteSkill
- high-end-visual-designSkill
- imagegen-frontend-mobileSkill
- imagegen-frontend-webSkill
- image-to-codeSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- industrial-brutalist-uiSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- nvidia-skillspectorSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- redesign-existing-projectsSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- social-contentSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- stitch-design-tasteSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-agent-skillsSkill
- videoSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

