observability-and-instrumentation
Skill33 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Structured logging, RED metrics, and OpenTelemetry tracing. Use when adding telemetry, or shipping anything that runs in production. Instrument as you build — not after incidents.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Every log line should be machine-parseable JSON, not a free-form string.
- Distinctive: line 97
Every request should carry a correlation ID that propagates through all log lines and outbound calls:
- Distinctive: line 123
Actionable alerts only: If an alert fires and you don't know what to do, the alert is not ready.
- Distinctive: line 173
No error logging in exception handlers
- Distinctive: line 177
Before shipping any new endpoint or feature:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Observability and Instrumentation
Overview
Instrument production code so that on-call engineers (including future AI agents) can answer: Is it working? What's broken? Why? Logs answer why. Metrics answer that something is wrong. Traces answer where. Build all three in as you go — retrofitting observability after an incident is painful and late.
When to Use
- Adding a new API endpoint or background job
- Shipping a feature that touches external services (GitHub API, Gemini)
- Modifying error handling or retry logic
- Any change to Cloud Run that affects request processing
The Three Pillars
1. Structured Logging
Every log line should be machine-parseable JSON, not a free-form string.
import structlog
log = structlog.get_logger()
# GOOD: Structured, queryable
log.info(
"skill_generation_started",
repo=repo,
tier=tier,
request_id=request_id,
)
log.error(
"github_api_error",
repo=repo,
status_code=e.status,
error=str(e),
request_id=request_id,
)
# BAD: Free-form string — unsearchable
print(f"Error fetching {repo}: {e}")
logger.info("Starting skill generation for " + repo)Log level conventions:
error— invariant broken, someone may need to actwarn— degraded but handled (rate limit approaching, retrying)info— significant business event (skill generated, export downloaded)debug— off in production; verbose tracing for local debugging
Never log:
- Secrets, API keys, or tokens
- Full request/response bodies
- Unredacted PII or GitHub personal access tokens
2. RED Metrics for Every Endpoint
For every API endpoint, instrument:
- Rate — requests per second
- Errors — error rate (%)
- Duration — p50/p95/p99 latency (histogram, never average)
from prometheus_client import Counter, Histogram
skill_generation_requests = Counter(
"skill_generation_requests_total",
"Total skill generation requests",
["tier", "status"] # labels: tier=standard|hd, status=success|error
)
skill_generation_duration = Histogram(
"skill_generation_duration_seconds",
"Skill generation duration",
["tier"],
buckets=[0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, 30.0, 60.0]
)
# Usage
with skill_generation_duration.labels(tier=tier).time():
try:
result = await generate_skill(repo, tier)
skill_generation_requests.labels(tier=tier, status="success").inc()
except Exception as e:
skill_generation_requests.labels(tier=tier, status="error").inc()
raise3. Correlation IDs
Every request should carry a correlation ID that propagates through all log lines and outbound calls:
import uuid
from fastapi import Request
@app.middleware("http")
async def add_correlation_id(request: Request, call_next):
request_id = request.headers.get("X-Request-ID", str(uuid.uuid4()))
# Bind to structlog context so all logs in this request carry it
with structlog.contextvars.bound_contextvars(request_id=request_id):
response = await call_next(request)
response.headers["X-Request-ID"] = request_id
return responseAlerting Principles
Alert on symptoms, not causes. Users experience symptoms.
| Wrong (cause-based alert) | Right (symptom-based alert) |
| "CPU > 80%" | "Error rate > 1% for 5 minutes" |
| "GitHub API calls failing" | "Skill generation success rate < 95%" |
| "Memory usage high" | "p95 latency > 5s" |
Actionable alerts only. If an alert fires and you don't know what to do, the alert is not ready.
Cloud Logging on Cloud Run
GitScape deploys to Cloud Run. Logs written to stdout/stderr are automatically captured by Cloud Logging:
# structlog outputs JSON to stdout → Cloud Logging ingests automatically
structlog.configure(
processors=[
structlog.stdlib.add_log_level,
structlog.processors.TimeStamper(fmt="iso"),
structlog.processors.JSONRenderer(),
],
wrapper_class=structlog.stdlib.BoundLogger,
logger_factory=structlog.PrintLoggerFactory(),
)Query logs in Cloud Logging:
resource.type="cloud_run_revision"
resource.labels.service_name="gitscape-api"
jsonPayload.event="skill_generation_started"GitScape-Specific Instrumentation Checklist
For every new endpoint in api/app/:
- Log
skill_generation_started(or equivalent) withrepo,tier,request_id - Log
skill_generation_completedwithrepo,tier,duration_ms - Log
skill_generation_failedwithrepo,tier,error,request_id - External API calls (GitHub, Gemini) logged with
endpoint,status_code,latency_ms - No secrets or tokens in any log line
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "I'll add logging later" | You'll add it at 2 AM during an incident. Add it now. |
| "It's obvious from the code what's happening" | It's not obvious from Cloud Logging at 2 AM when you have no context. |
| "Logs slow things down" | Async structured logging is negligible overhead. The absence of logs is never negligible during an outage. |
Red Flags
print()statements in production code- Log lines that are free-form strings without structured fields
- External API calls with no logging of status or latency
- Missing correlation ID on requests
- No error logging in exception handlers
Verification
Before shipping any new endpoint or feature:
- All request handlers log start/complete/error with structured fields
- External service calls (GitHub, Gemini) log status and latency
- Correlation ID is propagated through all log lines
- No secrets or tokens in any log line
- Log output spot-checked: valid JSON, structured fields visible in Cloud Logging
Other versions46 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 46
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 112ksame name
- ollaya-dev/ollaya★ 1.4ksame name
- rizqinrr/viserys-agent★ 560same name
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skills★ 87same name
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 46same name
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22same name
- afonsoft/skills★ 14same name
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 6same name
- Marvellbrazil/my-agentic-skills★ 4same name
- PenceZHR/stagepass★ 4same name
36 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use constraint-driven-development, receiving-code-review and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 18 projects that use this
CloudflareSkillreceiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Also in 5 projects that use this
OpenAISkillverification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillplaywright-cli
Automate browser interactions, test web pages and work with Playwright tests.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillimprove-codebase-architecture
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
Also in 6 projects that use this
GoogleSkillponytail
Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ad-creativeSkill
- addyosmani-agent-skillsSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- brandkitSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- chef-assistantSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- cloud-run-basicsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- design-taste-frontend-v1Skill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- full-output-enforcementSkill
- gemini-apiSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- googlecloudplatform-knowledge-catalogSkill
- google-cloud-recipe-authSkill
- google-cloud-recipe-networking-observabilitySkill
- google-cloud-recipe-onboardingSkill
- google-cloud-waf-cost-optimizationSkill
- google-cloud-waf-reliabilitySkill
- google-cloud-waf-securitySkill
- gpt-tasteSkill
- high-end-visual-designSkill
- imagegen-frontend-mobileSkill
- imagegen-frontend-webSkill
- image-to-codeSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- industrial-brutalist-uiSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- nvidia-skillspectorSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- redesign-existing-projectsSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- social-contentSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- stitch-design-tasteSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-agent-skillsSkill
- videoSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

