agentleFS
jhcdevjhcdev/omc-codex/skills/gpt-5-4-prompting/SKILL.md

gpt-5-4-prompting

Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Internal guidance for composing Codex and GPT-5.4 prompts for coding, review, diagnosis, and research tasks inside the Codex Claude Code plugin

2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. openai/codex-plugin-cc★ 33k100% same

    Edited · 1

    1. doctorplastic79-cmd/claude-skills★ 099% same

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈12

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill when codex:codex-rescue needs to ask Codex or another GPT-5.4-based workflow for help.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer one clear task per Codex run.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Add explicit grounding and verification rules for any task where unsupported guesses would hurt quality.

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer better prompt contracts over raising reasoning or adding long natural-language explanations.

    line 17
  5. Distinctive:

    Use XML tags consistently so the prompt has stable internal structure.

    line 18
  6. Distinctive:

    When to add blocks:

    line 27
  7. Very specific:

    Write-capable tasks: add action_safety so Codex stays narrow and avoids unrelated refactors.

    line 31
  8. Very specific:

    Use built-in review or adversarial-review commands when the job is reviewing local git changes.

    line 34
  9. Very specific:

    Use task when the task is diagnosis, planning, research, or implementation and you need to control the prompt more directly.

    line 35
  10. Very specific:

    Use task --resume-last for follow-up instructions on the same Codex thread.

    line 36
  11. Distinctive:

    Prefer explicit prompt contracts over vague nudges.

    line 39
  12. Distinctive:

    Use stable XML tag names that match the block names from the reference file.

    line 40
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not raise reasoning or complexity first.

    line 41
  14. Distinctive:

    Ask Codex for brief, outcome-based progress updates only when the task is long-running or tool-heavy.

    line 42
  15. Distinctive:

    Keep claims anchored to observed evidence.

    line 43
  16. Distinctive:

    Add verification, grounding, and safety tags only where the task needs them.

    line 49
  17. Distinctive:

    Remove redundant instructions before sending the prompt.

    line 50

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

GPT-5.4 Prompting

Use this skill when codex:codex-rescue needs to ask Codex or another GPT-5.4-based workflow for help.

Prompt Codex like an operator, not a collaborator. Keep prompts compact and block-structured with XML tags. State the task, the output contract, the follow-through defaults, and the small set of extra constraints that matter.

Core rules:

  • Prefer one clear task per Codex run. Split unrelated asks into separate runs.
  • Tell Codex what done looks like. Do not assume it will infer the desired end state.
  • Add explicit grounding and verification rules for any task where unsupported guesses would hurt quality.
  • Prefer better prompt contracts over raising reasoning or adding long natural-language explanations.
  • Use XML tags consistently so the prompt has stable internal structure.

Default prompt recipe:

  • <task>: the concrete job and the relevant repository or failure context.
  • <structured_output_contract> or <compact_output_contract>: exact shape, ordering, and brevity requirements.
  • <default_follow_through_policy>: what Codex should do by default instead of asking routine questions.
  • <verification_loop> or <completeness_contract>: required for debugging, implementation, or risky fixes.
  • <grounding_rules> or <citation_rules>: required for review, research, or anything that could drift into unsupported claims.

When to add blocks:

  • Coding or debugging: add completeness_contract, verification_loop, and missing_context_gating.
  • Review or adversarial review: add grounding_rules, structured_output_contract, and dig_deeper_nudge.
  • Research or recommendation tasks: add research_mode and citation_rules.
  • Write-capable tasks: add action_safety so Codex stays narrow and avoids unrelated refactors.

How to choose prompt shape:

  • Use built-in review or adversarial-review commands when the job is reviewing local git changes. Those prompts already carry the review contract.
  • Use task when the task is diagnosis, planning, research, or implementation and you need to control the prompt more directly.
  • Use task --resume-last for follow-up instructions on the same Codex thread. Send only the delta instruction instead of restating the whole prompt unless the direction changed materially.

Working rules:

  • Prefer explicit prompt contracts over vague nudges.
  • Use stable XML tag names that match the block names from the reference file.
  • Do not raise reasoning or complexity first. Tighten the prompt and verification rules before escalating.
  • Ask Codex for brief, outcome-based progress updates only when the task is long-running or tool-heavy.
  • Keep claims anchored to observed evidence. If something is a hypothesis, say so.

Prompt assembly checklist:

  1. Define the exact task and scope in <task>.
  2. Choose the smallest output contract that still makes the answer easy to use.
  3. Decide whether Codex should keep going by default or stop for missing high-risk details.
  4. Add verification, grounding, and safety tags only where the task needs them.
  5. Remove redundant instructions before sending the prompt.

Reusable blocks live in references/prompt-blocks.md. Concrete end-to-end templates live in references/codex-prompt-recipes.md. Common failure modes to avoid live in references/codex-prompt-antipatterns.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.