agentleFS
Sign inStart free
jhcdevjhcdev/omc-codex/skills/codex-result-handling/SKILL.md

codex-result-handling

Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Internal guidance for presenting Codex helper output back to the user

2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. openai/codex-plugin-cc★ 33k100% same

    Edited · 1

    1. doctorplastic79-cmd/claude-skills★ 098% same

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When the helper returns Codex output:

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use the file paths and line numbers exactly as the helper reports them.

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    If there are no findings, say that explicitly and keep the residual-risk note brief.

    line 15
  4. Distinctive:

    If Codex made edits, say so explicitly and list the touched files when the helper provides them.

    line 16
  5. Distinctive:

    If the helper reports malformed output or a failed Codex run, include the most actionable stderr lines and stop there instead of guessing.

    line 20
  6. Very specific:

    If the helper reports that setup or authentication is required, direct the user to /codex:setup and do not improvise alternate auth flows.

    line 21

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Codex Result Handling

When the helper returns Codex output:

  • Preserve the helper's verdict, summary, findings, and next steps structure.
  • For review output, present findings first and keep them ordered by severity.
  • Use the file paths and line numbers exactly as the helper reports them.
  • Preserve evidence boundaries. If Codex marked something as an inference, uncertainty, or follow-up question, keep that distinction.
  • Preserve output sections when the prompt asked for them, such as observed facts, inferences, open questions, touched files, or next steps.
  • If there are no findings, say that explicitly and keep the residual-risk note brief.
  • If Codex made edits, say so explicitly and list the touched files when the helper provides them.
  • For codex:codex-rescue, do not turn a failed or incomplete Codex run into a Claude-side implementation attempt. Report the failure and stop.
  • For codex:codex-rescue, if Codex was never successfully invoked, do not generate a substitute answer at all.
  • CRITICAL: After presenting review findings, STOP. Do not make any code changes. Do not fix any issues. You MUST explicitly ask the user which issues, if any, they want fixed before touching a single file. Auto-applying fixes from a review is strictly forbidden, even if the fix is obvious.
  • If the helper reports malformed output or a failed Codex run, include the most actionable stderr lines and stop there instead of guessing.
  • If the helper reports that setup or authentication is required, direct the user to /codex:setup and do not improvise alternate auth flows.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free