pr-review
Skill127 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Fix PR review comments by implementing requested changes
- Commits and pushes
195 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- static-web-server/static-web-servertheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- zerx-lab/FluxDowntheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- civitai/civitaitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- harshitsinghbhandari/domain-expansiontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Azure/azure-sdk-toolstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- databricks/clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use oss-pr, pr-automation and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CES-LtdSkilloss-pr
Use when creating a pull request, after committing changes, or when user invokes /oss-pr. Covers branch management, quality checks, commit, push, and PR creation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
CES-LtdSkillpr-automation
PR Automation Orchestrator: poll open PRs, check CI, run review, fix, and merge eligible PRs. Use when: (1) Invoked by daemon via scripts/pr-automation.sh, (2) User says "/pr-automation".
Also in 3 projects that use this
jtenniswoodSkillexpert-reset
Reimagine this repository from first principles using the current product and user experience as the target. Use when the user says "/expert-reset", asks how the project should be rebuilt if starting again, wants bold architecture or component-structure recommendations, or wants a research-only reset plan unconstrained by current implementation details.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jtenniswoodSkillupdates
Summarize user-facing project updates from the last 7 days, ordered by importance and written as one-sentence "Feature: description" entries. Use when the user says "/updates", asks what changed recently, or wants a concise list of recent features, device support, fixes that users will notice, or other product value.
Also in 3 projects that use this
openchamberSkillclack-cli-patterns
Use when creating or modifying OpenChamber CLI commands, prompts, terminal output, non-TTY behavior, `--quiet`, or `--json` behavior.
Also in 3 projects that use this
openchamberSkilldrag-to-reorder
Use when implementing or modifying OpenChamber sortable or drag-to-reorder behavior, especially `@dnd-kit`, touch/mobile interactions, variable-width items, or wrapping layouts.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +6 more from openchamber
Other versions195 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 195
- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT★ 188ksame name
- pytorch/pytorch★ 105ksame name
- rtk-ai/rtk★ 86ksame name
- saadeghi/daisyui★ 43ksame name
- rustfs/rustfs★ 36ksame name
- dotnet/maui★ 23ksame name
- NVIDIA/Megatron-LM★ 18ksame name
- MiniMax-AI/skills★ 14ksame name
- btriapitsyn/openchamber★ 13ksame name
- openchamber/openchamber★ 13ksame name
185 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- wiki/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- wiki/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accountable-engineeringSkill
- adrSkill
- babysit-prSkill
- blindspot-passSkill
- capability-experimentsSkill
- codemapSkill
- code-quality-reviewSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commit-atomicSkill
- context-discoverySkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- doc-searchSkill
- docs-updateSkill
- draft-pull-requestSkill
- git-contextSkill
- handoffsSkill
- implementation-loggerSkill
- implement-specSkill
- llm-wikiSkill
- orchestrating-fusionSkill
- pickupSkill
- plannotator-setup-goalSkill
- portless-localSkill
- prdSkill
- prSkill
- qmd-knowledgeSkill
- quiz-meSkill
- ralphSkill
- retroSkill
- security-auditSkill
- slopSkill
- spec-interviewSkill
- tddSkill
- tmuxSkill
- visual-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 178 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 33
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the PR identifier.
- Distinctive: line 41
If no open PR is found for the current branch, show this error:
- Distinctive: line 61
Run focused tests, then the relevant broader checks
- Distinctive: line 91
Does not treat a reply as resolution.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 178 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fix PR Review Comments
Fix PR review comments by implementing the requested changes.
Usage
/pr-review <PR_URL> # Review PR by URL (expects full GitHub URL)
/pr-review <PR_NUMBER> # Review PR by number (expects number, e.g., 123)
/pr-review # Auto-detect PR from current branch📋 Argument Handling
The command accepts the PR identifier from $ARGUMENTS:
- PR URL: Full GitHub PR URL (e.g.,
https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123) - PR Number: Just the PR number (e.g.,
123) - No Arguments: Auto-detect the PR associated with the current Git branch
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use it as the PR identifier. Otherwise, auto-detect the current branch's PR using:
gh pr view --json number,url -q '.number'This extracts the PR number from the current branch's open PR for use in subsequent commands.
If no open PR is found for the current branch, show this error:
Error: No open pull request found for the current branch.
To review a specific PR:
/pr-review <PR_URL>
/pr-review <PR_NUMBER>
Or create a PR first:
gh pr createProcess
- Parse
$ARGUMENTSto determine PR identifier (URL, number, or auto-detect) - Fetch PR details, review threads, issue comments, and authoritative thread-resolution state using
gh - Classify each comment as actionable, informational, disputed/ambiguous, or resolved; ask before changing disputed or ambiguous requests
- For each actionable comment, record the comment ID, planned change, and verification command
- Implement the approved fixes
- Run focused tests, then the relevant broader checks
- Recheck the comment-to-change list and confirm every actionable thread is resolved or explicitly deferred
- Commit the changes
Available Scripts
Extract PR Comments
The extract-pr-comments.js script processes GitHub PR review comments and issue comments to create actionable TODO lists.
# Usage
node $SKILL_PATH/scripts/extract-pr-comments.js <review-comments-file> <issue-comments-file> <threads-file> [output-file]
# Example
gh api graphql \
-f owner=OWNER -f name=REPO -F number=4972 \
-f query='query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) { repository(owner:$owner, name:$name) { pullRequest(number:$number) { reviewThreads(first:100) { nodes { isResolved comments(first:100) { nodes { databaseId } } } } } } }' \
> pr-4972-threads.json
node $SKILL_PATH/scripts/extract-pr-comments.js \
pr-4972-review-comments-raw.json \
pr-4972-issue-comments-raw.json \
pr-4972-threads.json \
pr-4972-comments.ndjsonWhat it does:
- Requires a threads file of GitHub review threads and skips a review comment only when its thread has
isResolved: true - Does not treat a reply as resolution; an unanswered thread stays actionable
- Classifies comments by severity (critical, high, medium, low)
- Categorizes comments (security, performance, maintainability, etc.)
- Creates 3 output files:
.ndjson- Structured comment data-todo.md- Prioritized TODO list-summary.md- Analysis summary with emojis
Severity classification:
- 🔴 Critical: security, vulnerability, exploit
- 🟠 High: bug, error, breaking, crash, fail
- 🟡 Medium: performance, improvement, refactor, optimize
- 🟢 Low: everything else
Categories:
- 🔒 Security
- ⚡ Performance
- 🔧 Maintainability
- ♿ Accessibility
- 🧪 Testing
- 📚 Documentation
- 🏷️ Typing
- 🎨 Style
- ✨ Code Quality
Examples
# Fix review comments for a PR using URL
/pr-review https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123
# Fix review comments using PR number
/pr-review 123
# Auto-detect PR from current branch
/pr-review
# After extracting comments with the script, work through the TODO list
# The TODO list is ordered by priority: Critical → High → Medium → LowDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

