codemap
Skill127 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create a seven-document architecture map when the user asks to map a codebase.
- Reads credentials
16 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thistleknot/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- openyida/openyidatheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- hmjBill/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- mike22890/opencode-skills-entheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- Asixa/codemap-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- htdxd/codemap-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use clonedeps and simplify.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
mike22890Skillclonedeps
将项目依赖的第三方库源码克隆到本地,便于深入阅读和调试。当需要查看库的实现细节、阅读源码、调试第三方依赖、理解 SDK/framework 内部机制、查看 node_modules 之外的原始代码、分析开源库架构、学习他人代码、查看依赖的 TypeScript 类型定义时使用。
Also in 4 projects that use this
Hugging FaceSkillsimplify
Refactor code after tests pass. The "Refactor" phase of Red-Green-Refactor.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 16
- JordanCoin/codemap★ 710same name
- akitaonrails/my-skills★ 283same name
- openyida/openyida★ 231same name
- ulpi-io/browse★ 15same name
- lglucas/ai-dev-operating-system★ 12same name
- Asixa/codemap-skill★ 8same name
- beadnall/codemap★ 8same name
- shalomb/agent-skills★ 3same name
- htdxd/codemap-skill★ 2same name
- arkan/skills★ 1same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- wiki/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- wiki/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accountable-engineeringSkill
- adrSkill
- babysit-prSkill
- blindspot-passSkill
- capability-experimentsSkill
- code-quality-reviewSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commit-atomicSkill
- context-discoverySkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- doc-searchSkill
- docs-updateSkill
- draft-pull-requestSkill
- git-contextSkill
- handoffsSkill
- implementation-loggerSkill
- implement-specSkill
- llm-wikiSkill
- orchestrating-fusionSkill
- pickupSkill
- plannotator-setup-goalSkill
- portless-localSkill
- prdSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- prSkill
- qmd-knowledgeSkill
- quiz-meSkill
- ralphSkill
- retroSkill
- security-auditSkill
- slopSkill
- spec-interviewSkill
- tddSkill
- tmuxSkill
- visual-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Use this skill when you need to:
- Distinctive: line 70
Use the actual current date for all analysis-date placeholders.
- Very specific: line 76
If .planning/codebase/ already exists, prompt:
- Distinctive: line 87
Create the output directory:
- Very specific: line 179
Before showing or committing documents, scan for accidentally copied credentials.
- Very specific: line 187
If the checks pass, .planning/ is not gitignored, and the user wants to commit:
- Distinctive: line 240
When spawned as a mapper agent:
- Distinctive: line 300
Write documents directly: - Use the Write tool, don't return contents
- Distinctive: line 301
Always include file paths: - Every finding needs a file path in backticks
- Distinctive: line 303
Be thorough: - Read actual files, don't guess
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Codemap
What I do
Analyze your entire codebase and create 7 comprehensive documentation files in .planning/codebase/:
- STACK.md - Technologies, dependencies, configuration
- INTEGRATIONS.md - 3rd party providers, APIs, databases, auth providers
- ARCHITECTURE.md - System patterns, layers, data flow
- STRUCTURE.md - Directory layout, key locations, naming conventions
- CONVENTIONS.md - Code style, patterns, error handling
- TESTING.md - Framework, structure, mocking, coverage
- CONCERNS.md - Tech debt, bugs, security, performance issues
When to use me
Use this skill when you need to:
- Onboard new developers to understand the codebase quickly
- Plan new features with full context of existing patterns
- Understand code conventions before making changes
- Identify technical debt and areas of concern
- Document the current state of the project
How it works
This skill runs four focus passes. Use parallel file-reading and file-writing workers when the runtime provides them. If suitable workers are unavailable, perform the same passes sequentially in the current context:
- Tech → Analyzes stack and integrations → STACK.md, INTEGRATIONS.md
- Architecture → Analyzes patterns and structure → ARCHITECTURE.md, STRUCTURE.md
- Quality → Analyzes conventions and testing → CONVENTIONS.md, TESTING.md
- Concerns → Identifies tech debt and issues → CONCERNS.md
Each pass:
- Explores the codebase for its focus
- Uses templates from
$SKILL_PATH/templates/ - Writes documents directly to
.planning/codebase/ - Returns only confirmation (not document contents)
The orchestrator:
- Creates
.planning/codebase/directory - Runs the four passes in parallel only when suitable workers are available
- Otherwise runs those passes sequentially in the current context
- Collects confirmations
- Verifies all documents created
- Commits the codebase map (if configured)
Process
Scope and Runtime
Accept an optional --paths <p1,p2,...> for an incremental map. Validate repository-relative prefixes before use: reject absolute paths, .. components, and shell metacharacters (;, backticks, $, &, |, <, >). If no supplied path is valid, stop and ask for a corrected scope; do not silently expand to the whole repository. Pass the same normalized scope to every mapper and every sequential pass. Do not interpolate unchecked input into shell commands.
Use the actual current date for all analysis-date placeholders. For scoped refreshes, retain documented information outside the scope and state which prefixes were rechecked.
Use parallel agents only when the runtime supports file-reading and file-writing workers. Do not assume an explore agent can write files or use a browser agent as a code mapper. If suitable workers are unavailable, perform the four focus passes sequentially in the current context, using the same scope and templates. Do not require GSD-specific SDK commands or agent types.
Step 1: Check Existing Map
If .planning/codebase/ already exists, prompt:
.planning/codebase/ already exists. What's next?
1. Refresh - Delete existing and remap codebase
2. Update - Keep existing, only update specific documents
3. Skip - Use existing codebase map as-isStep 2: Create Structure
Create the output directory:
mkdir -p .planning/codebaseStep 3: Run the Four Focus Passes
Run the passes in parallel only when the runtime supports file-reading and file-writing workers. Otherwise perform them sequentially in the current context. Parallel workers are optional, not required. Each pass must receive the validated scope, current date, and the appropriate template paths from $SKILL_PATH/templates/. The examples below describe assignments, not mandatory API parameter names. While a parallel worker is active, do not duplicate its exploration or write its documents.
Tech Agent:
agent_type: explore
description: Map codebase tech stack
prompt: |
Focus: tech
Analyze this codebase for technology stack and external integrations.
Write these documents to .planning/codebase/:
- STACK.md - Languages, runtime, frameworks, dependencies, configuration
- INTEGRATIONS.md - External APIs, databases, auth providers, webhooks
Use the templates from map-codebase skill. Explore thoroughly.
Write documents directly. Return confirmation only.Architecture Agent:
agent_type: explore
description: Map codebase architecture
prompt: |
Focus: arch
Analyze this codebase architecture and directory structure.
Write these documents to .planning/codebase/:
- ARCHITECTURE.md - Pattern, layers, data flow, abstractions, entry points
- STRUCTURE.md - Directory layout, key locations, naming conventions
Use the templates from map-codebase skill. Explore thoroughly.
Write documents directly. Return confirmation only.Quality Agent:
agent_type: explore
description: Map codebase conventions
prompt: |
Focus: quality
Analyze this codebase for coding conventions and testing patterns.
Write these documents to .planning/codebase/:
- CONVENTIONS.md - Code style, naming, patterns, error handling
- TESTING.md - Framework, structure, mocking, coverage
Use the templates from map-codebase skill. Explore thoroughly.
Write documents directly. Return confirmation only.Concerns Agent:
agent_type: explore
description: Map codebase concerns
prompt: |
Focus: concerns
Analyze this codebase for technical debt, known issues, and areas of concern.
Write this document to .planning/codebase/:
- CONCERNS.md - Tech debt, bugs, security, performance, fragile areas
Use the templates from map-codebase skill. Explore thoroughly.
Write document directly. Return confirmation only.Step 4: Verify Output
Wait for every mapper to finish. Check that all seven expected documents exist and each has more than 20 lines; a filename alone is not success. Report missing, short, or failed outputs and repair them before declaring completion. Check that dates are current and scoped output retains unaffected information.
ls -la .planning/codebase/
wc -l .planning/codebase/*.mdStep 5: Secret Check and Optional Commit
Before showing or committing documents, scan for accidentally copied credentials. List configuration paths and environment-variable names, not secret values. Do not read .env contents or credential files for the map. Use the repository's secret scanner when available. A minimal supplementary check is:
rg -l '(sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}|gh[pousr]_[A-Za-z0-9]{36,}|AKIA[A-Z0-9]{16}|xox[baprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]+|-----BEGIN.*PRIVATE KEY)' .planning/codebase/*.mdThis prints filenames only, not matching secret values. A no-match exit status is normal; a scanner error is not a clean scan. If a match is found, stop, redact the content, and recheck before proceeding. Pattern matching is not proof that all secrets are absent; also review excerpts copied from logs and configuration.
If the checks pass, .planning/ is not gitignored, and the user wants to commit:
git add .planning/codebase/*.md
git commit -m "docs: map existing codebase
- STACK.md - Technologies and dependencies
- ARCHITECTURE.md - System design and patterns
- STRUCTURE.md - Directory layout
- CONVENTIONS.md - Code style and patterns
- TESTING.md - Test structure
- INTEGRATIONS.md - External services
- CONCERNS.md - Technical debt and issues"Step 6: Summary
Present completion summary:
Codebase mapping complete.
Created .planning/codebase/:
- STACK.md ([N] lines) - Technologies and dependencies
- ARCHITECTURE.md ([N] lines) - System design and patterns
- STRUCTURE.md ([N] lines) - Directory layout and organization
- CONVENTIONS.md ([N] lines) - Code style and patterns
- TESTING.md ([N] lines) - Test structure and practices
- INTEGRATIONS.md ([N] lines) - External services and APIs
- CONCERNS.md ([N] lines) - Technical debt and issues
Next steps:
- Review documents: cat .planning/codebase/STACK.md
- Use these as reference when planning features
- Update as codebase evolvesTemplates
Templates are located in $SKILL_PATH/templates/:
STACK.md.template- Technology stackINTEGRATIONS.md.template- External integrationsARCHITECTURE.md.template- System architectureSTRUCTURE.md.template- Directory structureCONVENTIONS.md.template- Coding conventionsTESTING.md.template- Testing patternsCONCERNS.md.template- Technical concerns
Each agent reads the appropriate template and fills it in based on codebase exploration.
Agent Guidelines
When spawned as a mapper agent:
Exploration Commands
Helper: Use fd if available, fall back to find
# Define finder helper (fd if available, otherwise find)
_finder() { command -v fd >/dev/null 2>&1 && fd "$@" || find "$@"; }
_rg() { command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1 && rg "$@" || grep -r "$@"; }Tech Focus:
# Package manifests
cat package.json pyproject.toml Cargo.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null
# Config files
ls -la *.config.* tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null
# Find SDK/API imports
_rg "import.*stripe|import.*supabase|import.*aws" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -50Architecture Focus:
# Directory structure (fd is faster and ignores node_modules/.git by default)
_finder -t d . | head -50
# Entry points
_finder -t f "index.*" "main.*" "app.*" src/ app/ 2>/dev/null | head -20
# Import patterns
_rg "^import" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -100Quality Focus:
# Linting/formatting config
cat .eslintrc* .prettierrc* biome.json 2>/dev/null
# Test files
_finder -t f "\.test\." "\.spec\." 2>/dev/null | head -30Concerns Focus:
# TODO/FIXME comments
_rg "TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -50
# Large files (potential complexity)
_finder -t f "\.ts$" -e "\.tsx$" src/ 2>/dev/null | xargs wc -l 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20Critical Rules
- Write documents directly - Use the Write tool, don't return contents
- Always include file paths - Every finding needs a file path in backticks
- Use the templates - Fill in the template structure exactly
- Be thorough - Read actual files, don't guess
- Return only confirmation - Response should be ~10 lines with file paths and line counts
- Skip commits — orchestrator handles git operations
Inspiration
This skill is inspired by and adapted from glittercowboy/get-shit-done, specifically their map-codebase workflow and gsd-codebase-mapper agent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

