agentleFS
jcottamjcottam/agent-resources/skills/productivity/release-notes/SKILL.md

release-notes

Skill25 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Summarize a logical grouping of git commits into plain-language release notes for non-technical readers. Use when the user asks for release notes, what changed, a summary of commits, a plain-English changelog, or an easy-to-read bullet list of work at a specific reading level (default 8th grade). Ask which boundary to use (this branch, a PR, or recent commits) before writing.

180 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, brainstorm-ideas-new and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-experiments-existing

    Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-ideas-new

    Brainstorm feature ideas for a new product in initial discovery from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives. Use when starting product discovery for a new product, exploring features for a startup idea, or doing initial ideation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • 45ckSkill

    pestle-analysis

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    positioning-ideas

    Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    product-name

    Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +7 more from skytiger6724

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 166 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 17

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask which grouping of commits to summarize before gathering history or writing notes.

    line 24
  2. Distinctive:

    If the user already named a boundary in this request, use it.

    line 27
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not gather git history or draft notes until the boundary is known.

    line 38
  4. Distinctive:

    Follow-ups after they pick:

    line 40
  5. Distinctive:

    Run read-only git commands.

    line 53
  6. Distinctive:

    If the range is empty, say so and stop.

    line 74
  7. Very specific:

    Read commit messages and file stats (--stat) to learn what actually changed.

    line 78
  8. Distinctive:

    If the user liked the paragraph and asks for bullets next, convert without re-explaining from scratch.

    line 97
  9. Distinctive:

    Prefer: "the page loads smoother", "videos show first", "a duplicate button was removed".

    line 107
  10. Distinctive:

    Avoid unless requested: refactor, dependency bump, ResizeObserver, hook names, component paths.

    line 109
  11. Distinctive:

    No hype ("exciting", "powerful", "game-changing").

    line 111
  12. Distinctive:

    Use these headings unless the user specifies another format.

    line 125
  13. Distinctive:

    When grouping commits, map themes to plain labels:

    line 142
  14. Distinctive:

    Ask which boundary: this branch, a PR, or recent commits.

    line 158
  15. Distinctive:

    After they answer, gather that range, group related commits, then write notes at 8th-grade level.

    line 159
  16. Distinctive:

    Do:: ask which grouping to use, then summarize, rephrase, group, and adjust reading level.

    line 185
  17. Distinctive:

    Do not: default the range to "recent commits" or a commit count.

    line 188
  18. Distinctive:

    Do not: run destructive git commands or modify the repo as part of this skill.

    line 189

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 166 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Release Notes

Turn a logical grouping of commits into clear summaries for teammates, stakeholders, or changelogs — not developer jargon.

Workflow

1. Choose the boundary (required)

Ask which grouping of commits to summarize before gathering history or writing notes. Do not assume. Do not default to "recent commits."

If the user already named a boundary in this request, use it. Otherwise ask once and wait:

Which commits should these notes cover?

  1. This branch — commits on the current branch that are not on the default base (usually main)
  2. A PR — commits in a pull request (number, URL, or this branch's open PR)
  3. Recent commits — only when the user chooses this; they must name a count, date, or tag

Do not gather git history or draft notes until the boundary is known.

Follow-ups after they pick:

They choseIf still missing, ask
A PRWhich PR (number, URL), unless the current branch already has one
Recent commitsHow far back (last N commits, since a date, or since a tag)
This branchNothing — detect the base and proceed

Author, path, or extra filters are optional refinements after the boundary is set, not a substitute for it.

2. Gather that range

Run read-only git commands. Do not commit, push, or edit files unless the user explicitly asks.

Detect the default base with git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD (fall back to origin/main or origin/master).

BoundaryRange
This branch<base>..HEAD on the current branch. If HEAD is already the default branch, say so and ask for another boundary — there is no unique branch range.
A PRCommits on the PR head that are not on its base. Prefer gh pr view [<n>|URL] --json title,baseRefName,headRefName,commits when GitHub CLI is available; otherwise git log <pr-base>..<pr-head>.
Recent commitsExactly the window they named: git log --oneline -<n>, --since=<date>, or <tag>..HEAD. Do not invent a count.

Then collect detail:

git log --oneline <range>
git log --stat --format='%h %s%n%b' <range>

Skip empty merge commits unless they carry meaningful context.

If the range is empty, say so and stop. Do not widen the range on your own.

3. Understand the changes

  • Read commit messages and file stats (--stat) to learn what actually changed.
  • Group related commits into one user-facing idea (e.g. three truncation commits → "prompts load without flicker").
  • Focus on user-visible behavior: what someone using the app will see or feel.
  • Deprioritize internal-only work (refactors, lockfile-only bumps) unless it is the whole story or the user asked for technical detail.

4. Deliver outputs (in order)

Produce only what the user asked for. When they want the full treatment, use this order:

  1. Technical digest (optional) — one short paragraph for engineers; file names and mechanisms OK here.
  2. Plain paragraph — 3–5 sentences at the requested reading level (default: 8th grade).
  3. Bulleted list — same content as the paragraph, one idea per line.

If the user liked the paragraph and asks for bullets next, convert without re-explaining from scratch.

State the boundary you used in one short line before the notes (branch name, PR number, or the recent-commits window).

Plain-language writing rules

  • Short sentences. Common words. Active voice.
  • Describe what changed for the user, not which files moved.
  • Prefer: "the page loads smoother", "videos show first", "a duplicate button was removed".
  • Avoid unless requested: refactor, dependency bump, ResizeObserver, hook names, component paths.
  • No hype ("exciting", "powerful", "game-changing"). State facts.
  • Dependency updates: one line like "software packages were updated" unless versions matter to the audience.

Reading levels

LevelGuidance
8th grade (default)Everyday words; no acronyms without explanation; one idea per sentence
ExecutiveOutcomes and impact; even shorter; skip implementation
TechnicalCommit themes, areas touched, breaking changes; jargon OK

Output template

Use these headings unless the user specifies another format.

### What changed
[One short paragraph — plain language]

### At a glance
- [Bullet 1]
- [Bullet 2]
- ...

For a technical-only request, omit the template and write a concise engineer-facing summary.

Categorization hints

When grouping commits, map themes to plain labels:

Commit themePlain-language angle
UI layout / typographyEasier to read; cleaner layout
Performance / flickerLoads smoother; less jumping on screen
Sort / orderingImportant items show up first
Nav / headerMenu or navigation simplified
Auth / permissionsWho can do what changed
DependenciesBehind-the-scenes updates (brief)
Tests onlyUsually omit unless user cares

Examples

User: "Write release notes"

  1. Ask which boundary: this branch, a PR, or recent commits. Do not log git yet.
  2. After they answer, gather that range, group related commits, then write notes at 8th-grade level.

User: "Release notes for this PR"

  1. Boundary is already a PR — do not re-ask. Identify the PR (current branch's open PR, or ask for the number if none).
  2. Gather PR commits vs its base. Output paragraph + bullets.

User: "Summarize this branch for the team"

  1. Boundary is this branch. Log <base>..HEAD.
  2. Group related commits. Output paragraph + bullets at 8th-grade level.

User: "What did we ship since v1.2.0? Keep it short."

  1. Boundary is recent commits with a named tag. git log v1.2.0..HEAD --oneline.
  2. Output plain paragraph only; skip technical digest unless asked.

User: "Bullet list only, executive level, last 5 commits"

  1. Boundary is recent commits with an explicit count. Do not ask again.
  2. Output ### At a glance bullets only; no paragraph; outcome-focused.

Boundaries

  • Do: ask which grouping to use, then summarize, rephrase, group, and adjust reading level.
  • Do not: invent features not supported by the commits.
  • Do not: default the range to "recent commits" or a commit count.
  • Do not: run destructive git commands or modify the repo as part of this skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.