squash-branch
Skill25 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review commits in a branch, date range, or recent history; group related work into a clean linear history; and verify that the final tree is unchanged. Use when the user asks to squash commits, clean Git history, combine WIP commits, organize today's commits, or prepare a readable commit stack.
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Commits and pushes
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lbedner/aegis-stacktheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- lbedner/aegis-stack★ 146same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- content-wireframeSkill
- new-projectSkill
- orientSkill
- promote-skillSkill
- review-prSkill
- shipSkill
- release-notesSkill
- writing-ticketsSkill
- hostSkill
- advisorSkill
- sounding-boardSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Create a backup branch.
- Distinctive: line 27
Run the project's tests and build.
- Distinctive: line 32
Use the range named by the user:
- Distinctive: line 42
If there are uncommitted changes, commit them only when the user asks.
- Distinctive: line 47
Read the log, messages, and file statistics:
- Distinctive: line 59
Prefer a few clear commits, but do not force unrelated work into an arbitrary commit count.
- Distinctive: line 94
Keep commits in their original order unless reordering is required to form a logical group.
- Very specific: line 98
Do not use git checkout <sha> -- .
- Distinctive: line 111
Run the repository's normal quality gates.
- Distinctive: line 114
If the tree differs or a quality gate fails, do not push.
- Very specific: line 125
Never use a plain --force push.
- Distinctive: line 130
Use an imperative subject of 72 characters or fewer.
- Distinctive: line 132
Do not list every changed file.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Squash Branch
Turn noisy Git history into a small, reviewable commit stack without changing the final code.
Workflow
- Define the commit range.
- Review each commit's purpose and files.
- Group related commits.
- Create a backup branch.
- Rebuild the commits.
- Compare the rebuilt tree with the backup.
- Run the project's tests and build.
- Push with
--force-with-lease.
1. Define the range
Use the range named by the user:
- Feature branch:
<base>..HEAD - Since a commit or tag:
<ref>..HEAD - Today's work: commits since local midnight
- Recent work: the requested number of commits
Confirm the current branch, working tree, remote, and selected base before changing history.
If there are uncommitted changes, commit them only when the user asks. Otherwise, ask whether to commit or stash them.
2. Review the commits
Read the log, messages, and file statistics:
git log <range> --reverse --format="%H %s%n%b---"
git diff <base>...HEAD --stat
git show --stat <sha>Group commits by purpose. Combine fixups, tests, documentation, and polish with the change they support. Keep unrelated features, infrastructure changes, and reverts separate.
Prefer a few clear commits, but do not force unrelated work into an arbitrary commit count.
3. Create a backup
git branch backup/<branch>-<date> HEADRecord the original tip and base commit. The backup protects the exact tree while history is rebuilt.
4. Rebuild the history
Reset to the base only after the backup exists:
git reset --hard <base>For contiguous groups, restore the tree at each group's tip:
git read-tree -u --reset <group-tip>
git commit -m "<clear subject>" -m "<why this group exists>"For non-contiguous groups, apply the selected commits without committing, then create one new commit:
git cherry-pick -n <sha-1> <sha-2> <sha-3>
git commit -m "<clear subject>" -m "<why this group exists>"Keep commits in their original order unless reordering is required to form a logical group. Stop and report conflicts rather than guessing how to resolve them.
Do not use git checkout <sha> -- . to restore a full tree. It can leave files
that later commits deleted.
5. Verify
The rebuilt tree must exactly match the backup:
git diff --exit-code backup/<branch>-<date> HEAD
git log <base>..HEAD --oneline
git status --shortRun the repository's normal quality gates. Include tests and a production build when available.
If the tree differs or a quality gate fails, do not push.
6. Push safely
Rewriting main or master requires clear user approval. Warn that other
checkouts may need to reset after the push.
git push --force-with-lease origin <branch>Never use a plain --force push. Delete the backup only after verification and
the push both succeed.
Commit messages
- Use an imperative subject of 72 characters or fewer.
- Explain why the group exists in one or two body sentences.
- Do not list every changed file.
Final report
Report:
- The old and new commit counts
- The new commit list
- Quality gates and their results
- The pushed branch
- Any reset command collaborators may need
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

