roi-calculator
Skill15 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build ROI analyses, TCO comparisons, and value calculators for prospects. Use this skill when a rep needs to justify the investment to a prospect, build a business case with numbers, create an ROI model, compare total cost of ownership, says "build me an ROI calculator", "what's the payback period", "help me show the value", "TCO comparison", or when a prospect asks "what's the return on this?". Also trigger when building value engineering tools, cost-benefit analyses, or investment justification documents.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ZJU-REAL/Easeltheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- teachskillofskills-ai/DigitalMarketingPro-techshutheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- OneWave-AI/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- GTMify/aigtmtheir own version, first seen May 25, 2026
- koinod/skillstheir own version, first seen May 22, 2026
- koinod/koino-skillstheir own version, first seen May 22, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prospect-research.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
riccardovandraSkillprospect-research
Analyze a prospect's website and product to understand what they sell, who they sell to, and what buying triggers exist. First step of the outreach pipeline.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- ZJU-REAL/Easel★ 4.5ksame name
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro★ 934same name
- OneWave-AI/claude-skills★ 378same name
- GTMify/aigtm★ 25same name
- koinod/koino-skills★ 7same name
- koinod/skills★ 0same name
- teachskillofskills-ai/DigitalMarketingPro-techshu★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- battle-cardsSkill
- buyer-personaSkill
- campaign-to-fieldSkill
- content-healthSkill
- deal-qualificationSkill
- discovery-guideSkill
- expansion-playbookSkill
- gtm-memorySkill
- handoff-builderSkill
- objection-handlingSkill
- partner-enablementSkill
- pipeline-intelligenceSkill
- playbook-builderSkill
- proposal-builderSkill
- rep-profileSkill
- sales-coachingSkill
- win-loss-analysisSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 65
CRITICAL: Before asking for pricing and cost data, pull everything from connected tools.
- Very specific: line 69
Check if you have access to CRM tools (look for tools containing search_crm_objects, get_crm_objects, or similar).
- Distinctive: line 71
If CRM tools ARE available:
- Very specific: line 73
Find the deal: Search deals for the company/deal name the user mentioned.
- Distinctive: line 83
Check for prior deals or products: Search for other deals with this company to understand current spend and contract history.
- Very specific: line 88
Get company financials: Use zoominfo_search_company with the prospect company name/domain.
- Very specific: line 91
Get tech stack: Use zoominfo_get_tech_stack for the prospect company.
- Very specific: line 95
Enrich the company: Use clay_enrich_company with the prospect company domain.
- Very specific: line 99
Search company updates: Use linkedin_search_companies for hiring trends and growth indicators.
- Very specific: line 105
Check if you have access to Gong tools (look for tools prefixed with gong_).
- Distinctive: line 107
If Gong tools ARE available:
- Very specific: line 109
Find discovery calls: Use gong_search_calls with the company name.
- Very specific: line 110
Pull transcripts: Use gong_get_transcript on discovery calls.
- Distinctive: line 122
After the auto-pull, ask ONLY for what the tools couldn't provide:
- Very specific: line 134
Update memory/deal-patterns.md with ROI drivers that resonate by industry/persona
- Very specific: line 135
Update memory/product.md with new cost/value data points discovered
- Distinctive: line 153
Don't worry if you don't have everything — I'll use reasonable industry assumptions and clearly label them.
- Distinctive: line 281
When requested, I can build an HTML calculator the rep can share with the prospect.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ROI Calculator
Help reps quantify the value of their solution in the prospect's specific context. An ROI analysis turns "our product is great" into "here's exactly how much money this saves you and how fast you'll see the return." It's the single most powerful tool for getting budget approved.
Why ROI Matters in B2B Sales
- Finance stakeholders approve budgets with numbers, not stories
- Champions need ammunition to sell internally — an ROI model is that ammunition
- It reframes the conversation from "cost" to "investment"
- It creates urgency by quantifying the cost of delay
How It Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ROI CALCULATOR │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MODELS │
│ 1. ROI Analysis — Return on investment with payback period │
│ 2. TCO Comparison — Total cost of ownership vs alternatives │
│ 3. Cost of Inaction — What it costs to NOT buy your solution │
│ 4. Value Calculator — Interactive model prospects can customize │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ OUTPUT │
│ • Financial model with assumptions clearly stated │
│ • Executive-ready summary │
│ • Sensitivity analysis (best/likely/worst case) │
│ • Interactive HTML calculator (if requested) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + ~~CRM: Deal size, company revenue, and team context │
│ + ~~CRM: Current solution and contract details │
│ + ~~conversation intelligence (Gong): Discovery call metrics │
│ + ~~conversation intelligence (Gong): Prospect-stated costs │
│ + ~~data enrichment (ZoomInfo): Company financials & headcount │
│ + ~~data enrichment (ZoomInfo): Industry and tech stack context │
│ + ~~data enrichment (Clay): Company enrichment and signals │
│ + ~~data enrichment (LinkedIn): Company growth and hiring data │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Getting Started
- "Build an ROI model for [Company] — our product costs $X and saves them Y"
- "What's the payback period for a $50K deal that saves 10 hours per week?"
- "Create a TCO comparison: us vs their current solution"
- "Help me quantify the cost of inaction for [prospect]"
- "Build me a value calculator I can share with the prospect"
Execution Flow
Step 0: Automatic Data Pull (Before Asking the User Anything)
CRITICAL: Before asking for pricing and cost data, pull everything from connected tools. Real company data makes the ROI model dramatically more credible than industry averages.
CRM Data Pull
Check if you have access to CRM tools (look for tools containing search_crm_objects, get_crm_objects, or similar).
If CRM tools ARE available:
- Find the deal. Search
dealsfor the company/deal name the user mentioned.- Properties:
dealname,amount,dealstage,closedate,pipeline,hubspot_owner_id,dealtype,description - The
amountfield gives you the investment number for the ROI model
- Properties:
- Pull company. Get associated company data.
- Properties:
name,domain,industry,numberofemployees,annualrevenue,description,founded_year - Annual revenue → market context for the ROI model
- Employee count → headcount-based savings calculations
- Properties:
- Pull contacts. Get associated contacts for the deal.
- Properties:
firstname,lastname,jobtitle,email - Titles tell you who the ROI model needs to convince (CFO wants different metrics than VP Ops)
- Properties:
- Check for prior deals or products. Search for other deals with this company to understand current spend and contract history.
Sales Intelligence Data Pull
ZoomInfo (if available):
- Get company financials. Use
zoominfo_search_companywith the prospect company name/domain.- Revenue, employee count, funding → calibrate the ROI model to their scale
- Industry → select appropriate industry benchmarks
- Get tech stack. Use
zoominfo_get_tech_stackfor the prospect company.- Current tools and costs → feeds TCO comparison directly
Clay (if available):
- Enrich the company. Use
clay_enrich_companywith the prospect company domain.- Additional financial data, growth signals, and company context
LinkedIn (if available):
- Search company updates. Use
linkedin_search_companiesfor hiring trends and growth indicators.- Rapid hiring → opportunity for headcount-efficiency arguments
- Growth trajectory → tie ROI to scaling challenges
Gong Data Pull
Check if you have access to Gong tools (look for tools prefixed with gong_).
If Gong tools ARE available:
- Find discovery calls. Use
gong_search_callswith the company name. - Pull transcripts. Use
gong_get_transcripton discovery calls.- Extract: specific cost numbers the prospect mentioned ("we spend $X on...", "it takes us Y hours to...")
- Extract: stated goals and success metrics they care about
- Extract: their current process and pain points (feeds "Current State" in value drivers)
- Use prospect-stated numbers as the primary inputs — their own data is the most credible input for an ROI model.
Present What You Found
"I pulled context for the [Company] ROI model: $[X] deal size per CRM. Per ZoomInfo, they're a $[X]M revenue company with [N] employees in [industry]. [If Gong:] On the discovery call, they mentioned spending $[X] per month on [current solution] and losing [N] hours per week to [problem]. Building the ROI model with their actual numbers now..."
Step 1: Gather Remaining Context
After the auto-pull, ask ONLY for what the tools couldn't provide:
- Your solution's specific efficiency gains — What does your product actually improve?
- Pricing structure — If not in CRM deal data
- Implementation costs — One-time costs beyond subscription
- Prospect-specific cost data — Anything not captured in discovery (ask the rep what they know)
Step 2: Generate the ROI Model
Build using ALL evidence. Use prospect-stated numbers (from Gong) as primary inputs. Use ZoomInfo/CRM data as secondary inputs. Use industry benchmarks only as fallback. Cite sources: "Per prospect (Gong discovery call):", "Per CRM:", "Per ZoomInfo:", "Industry benchmark:"
Step 3: Store Insights
- Update
memory/deal-patterns.mdwith ROI drivers that resonate by industry/persona - Update
memory/product.mdwith new cost/value data points discovered - Log the analysis in
memory/changelog.md
What I Need From You (When Tools Aren't Connected)
About your solution:
- Price — Total investment (or annual cost)
- Implementation cost/time — Any upfront investment beyond the subscription
- What it does — Specific efficiency gains, cost reductions, revenue impact
About the prospect:
- Their current costs — What they're spending now (time, money, tools, headcount)
- Their pain — What problems this solves and how much those cost
- Team size — How many people are affected
- Revenue context — Company size, deal values, or other relevant financial context
Don't worry if you don't have everything — I'll use reasonable industry assumptions and clearly label them. The prospect can adjust.
ROI Analysis Framework
Revenue Impact
- New revenue enabled (faster sales, better conversion, larger deals)
- Revenue retention (reduced churn, faster renewals)
- Revenue acceleration (shorter sales cycles, faster time-to-value)
Cost Reduction
- Labor savings (time saved × fully loaded cost per hour)
- Tool consolidation (replacing existing software costs)
- Error reduction (cost of mistakes, rework, compliance risk)
- Operational efficiency (process improvement, automation gains)
Strategic Value (harder to quantify but important)
- Competitive advantage
- Risk mitigation
- Employee satisfaction and retention
- Scalability without headcount growth
Output Format: ROI Analysis
# ROI Analysis: [Your Solution] for [Company]
**Prepared:** [Date]
**Annual Investment:** $[amount]
**Projected Annual Return:** $[amount]
**ROI:** [X]%
**Payback Period:** [X months]
---
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: "Based on [Company]'s specific situation, we project a [X]% ROI with a [X]-month payback period. The primary value drivers are [top 2-3]. Conservative estimates suggest $[X] in annual savings/revenue impact."]
---
## Investment
| Component | Annual Cost |
|-----------|-----------|
| [Product/license] | $[amount] |
| [Implementation] | $[amount] (one-time) |
| [Training] | $[amount] (one-time) |
| **Total Year 1** | **$[amount]** |
| **Annual Recurring** | **$[amount]** |
---
## Value Drivers
### 1. [Value Driver Name] — $[amount]/year
**Current State:** [What they do today and what it costs]
**Future State:** [What changes with your solution]
**Calculation:**
- [Input] × [Rate] × [Factor] = $[amount]
**Assumption:** [Clearly state the assumption and how to verify]
### 2. [Value Driver Name] — $[amount]/year
[Same structure]
### 3. [Value Driver Name] — $[amount]/year
[Same structure]
---
## Three-Year Projection
| | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total |
|---|--------|--------|--------|-------|
| **Investment** | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| **Returns** | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| **Net Value** | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| **Cumulative ROI** | [X]% | [X]% | [X]% | [X]% |
---
## Sensitivity Analysis
| Scenario | Annual Return | ROI | Payback |
|----------|-------------|-----|---------|
| **Conservative** (50% of projected) | $[X] | [X]% | [X] months |
| **Expected** | $[X] | [X]% | [X] months |
| **Optimistic** (150% of projected) | $[X] | [X]% | [X] months |
Even in the conservative scenario, the investment pays for itself in [X] months.
---
## Cost of Delay
Every month you wait costs approximately $[monthly impact]:
- [Cost element 1]: $[X]/month
- [Cost element 2]: $[X]/month
Over a typical [X]-month evaluation cycle, the cost of delay is $[total].
---
## Assumptions and Methodology
| Assumption | Value | Source |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| [Assumption 1] | [Value] | [Prospect-provided / Industry benchmark / Estimate] |
| [Assumption 2] | [Value] | [Source] |
All assumptions are adjustable. We recommend validating these numbers with your finance team.
---
## Sources
- [Industry benchmarks used]
- [Research cited]Interactive Calculator Option
When requested, I can build an HTML calculator the rep can share with the prospect. It includes:
- Input fields for the prospect to enter their own numbers
- Real-time ROI calculation
- Visual charts showing payback timeline
- Downloadable summary
This is powerful because it puts the prospect in control — they trust their own numbers more than yours.
Tips for Effective ROI Conversations
- Use their numbers, not yours — Ask the prospect for their cost data. They'll trust it more.
- Be conservative — Under-promise. A believable 150% ROI beats an unbelievable 500% ROI.
- Label every assumption — Transparency builds trust. Let them challenge your inputs.
- Include soft costs — Opportunity cost, employee frustration, and risk are real even if harder to quantify.
- Cost of delay is your friend — "Every month you wait costs $X" creates urgency without pressure.
Related Skills
- proposal-builder — Embed the ROI analysis in a formal proposal
- deal-qualification — ROI data fills the "Metrics" criterion in MEDDIC
- objection-handling — Use ROI data to handle price objections
- discovery-guide — Better discovery gives you better inputs for the ROI model
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

