release-checkpoint
Skill0 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Inspect or create a high-integrity Git commit/release checkpoint with exact repository provenance and staged-diff verification. Use for checkpoint, commit, push-readiness, or release preparation; writes require explicit authorization.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- acceptance-qaSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- bug-fix-verificationSkill
- dependency-upgradeSkill
- docs-syncSkill
- idea-to-scopeSkill
- implementation-planSkill
- independent-reviewSkill
- migration-safetySkill
- performance-investigationSkill
- pull-request-handoffSkill
- root-cause-investigationSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- surgical-changeSkill
- test-gap-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 10
Default to inspection mode: collect evidence and report readiness without modifying repository state.
- Distinctive: line 18
Verify: Run appropriate tests, lint, build or artifact validation.
- Distinctive: line 22
If explicitly asked to stage files, stage only an enumerated allowlist of paths.
- Distinctive: line 23
If a commit was explicitly authorized, create it only after checking the staged diff and verification status.
- Distinctive: line 29
Before an authorized push, establish the expected remote destination and relationship to its current tip.
- Distinctive: line 31
If high-risk integrity checks fail, report the mismatch.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release checkpoint
Modes and authority
Default to inspection mode: collect evidence and report readiness without modifying repository state. Enter write mode only when the user explicitly authorizes the particular commit, tag, push, or release action and its scope. A request to inspect readiness does not authorize publishing.
Before any write
- Establish identity. Confirm repository root and remote(s), current branch,
HEAD, parent relationship where relevant, expected base, and target environment. Do not guess the intended repository or branch. - Record all state. Inspect staged changes, unstaged tracked changes, unexpected untracked files, conflicts, and ignored outputs where relevant. Use commands such as
git status --porcelain=v1 -uall,git diff --name-status,git diff --cached --name-status, andgit diff --cached --check. - Resolve provenance. Compare against the expected branch/commit/remote if that evidence is available. Remote-tracking refs can be stale; fetching changes local refs and should not be done silently where the task is strictly read-only. Mark remote state unverified if it was not checked.
- Enforce scope. Enumerate exact intended files and examine the entire staged patch. Stop if the stage includes unexpected paths, the worktree contains unreconciled changes relevant to the operation, or the target differs from expectations.
- Verify. Run appropriate tests, lint, build or artifact validation. Record command, observed result, skipped checks, and any output/hash used as a release input.
Authorized local checkpoint
- If explicitly asked to stage files, stage only an enumerated allowlist of paths. Never use
git add .orgit add -Aby default. Recheckgit diff --cached --name-statusandgit diff --cachedafterward. - If a commit was explicitly authorized, create it only after checking the staged diff and verification status. Record the resulting commit SHA and parent SHA. Stop if a hook or tool altered the staged content unexpectedly; re-inspect rather than bypass checks.
- Confirm
HEAD, staged/unstaged/untracked state, and any expected artifact hash after the operation. Do not claim a clean worktree unless it is observed.
Push, release, and deployment boundaries
- Push, tag, publish, deploy, rollback, force-push, history rewrite, and destructive cleanup each require explicit authority and a known target. No force push by default.
- Before an authorized push, establish the expected remote destination and relationship to its current tip. Stop if divergent or uncertain; do not silently reconcile by rebasing or resetting.
- A successful local commit is not a confirmed push. A successful push is not a deployed release. A successful deploy command is not proof that production is healthy.
- If high-risk integrity checks fail, report the mismatch. Never disable the checks just to pass.
Output
Provide a compact checkpoint ledger: repo/branch/HEAD (before), staged file list, verification evidence, actions performed or withheld, commit and parent (if created), remote/deployment state (confirmed or unknown), repo/HEAD/worktree (after), and unresolved risks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

