product-manager
Skill7 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create comprehensive product requirements documents including BRD, PRD/SRS, functional requirements, non-functional requirements, user stories, and acceptance criteria. Use as step 3 of the product pipeline, after business analysis is complete. Requires `02-business-analysis.md` as input.
47 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zhanguoliang715/agent-pipeline-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sagarithm/sagarithm-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- delorenj/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- AndrewDryga/emisartheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- J-T-McC/dev-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use data-scientist, legal-advisor and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
belokonmSkilldata-scientist
Expert in statistical analysis, predictive modeling, machine learning, and data storytelling to drive business insights.
Also in 6 projects that use this
lotosbinSkilllegal-advisor
法务顾问专家,精通法务合规、合同管理、知识产权、劳动法和风险管理
Also in 3 projects that use this
lotosbinSkilltech-lead
技术负责人专家,精通技术架构设计、技术选型、代码审查和团队技术管理
Also in 4 projects that use this
belokonmSkillsecurity-engineer
Expert in infrastructure security, DevSecOps pipelines, and zero-trust architecture design.
Also in 5 projects that use this
glinckerSkillqa-engineer
QA specialist agent for test planning, execution, and regression analysis
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillfrontend-engineer
Pro frontend engineering discipline. Enforces build-test-verify workflow for every web project. Never declare done until the site is built, tested, responsive, accessible, and visually verified in a real browser. Use alongside vercel-cli for production-quality deployments.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from belokonm
Other versions47 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 47
- AndrewDryga/emisar★ 392same name
- getnao/sylph★ 195same name
- nagisanzenin/claude-code-production-grade-plugin★ 181same name
- tronghieu/agent-skills★ 94same name
- ncklrs/startup-os-skills★ 51same name
- DGouron/review-flow★ 42same name
- jshsakura/awesome-opencode-skills★ 30same name
- delorenj/skills★ 17same name
- sagarithm/sagarithm-kit★ 17same name
- lotosbin/claude-skills★ 14same name
37 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- business-analystSkill
- developer-agentSkill
- interview-agentSkill
- scrum-masterSkill
- solution-architectSkill
- start-newSkill
- ux-designerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 34 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Read @output_dir@/01-interview-brief.md and @output_dir@/02-business-analysis.md
- Distinctive: line 122
Every functional requirement must trace to at least one user story
- Distinctive: line 123
Every user story must have acceptance criteria
- Distinctive: line 124
Use MoSCoW prioritization — be ruthless about "Must" vs "Could"
- Distinctive: line 127
Keep the PRD focused on WHAT, not HOW (that's architecture's job)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 34 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Product Manager — Step 3 of Product Pipeline
Goal
Translate business understanding into detailed, actionable product requirements.
Input
Read @output_dir@/01-interview-brief.md and @output_dir@/02-business-analysis.md
Output
Save to @output_dir@/03-product-requirements.md
Deliverables
1. BRD — Business Requirements Document
- Business objectives
- Success metrics (KPIs)
- Scope (in-scope and out-of-scope)
- Stakeholders
- Timeline overview
2. PRD / SRS — Product/Software Requirements Document
- Product overview
- Target release
- Assumptions and dependencies
- Feature list with priorities (MoSCoW: Must, Should, Could, Won't)
3. Functional Requirements
For each feature:
- Feature ID (e.g., FR-001)
- Description
- User story reference
- Priority
- Dependencies
4. Non-Functional Requirements
- Performance (response times, throughput)
- Security (authentication, authorization, data protection)
- Scalability (concurrent users, data volume)
- Reliability (uptime, error handling)
- Usability (accessibility, responsiveness)
- Maintainability (code standards, documentation)
- Compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)
5. User Stories
Format: As a [persona], I want [action], so that [benefit]
Group by epic. Each story should be:
- Independent
- Negotiable
- Valuable
- Estimable
- Small
- Testable
6. Acceptance Criteria
For each user story, define:
- Given/When/Then scenarios
- Edge cases
- Error scenarios
- Definition of done
Output Template
# Product Requirements: [Project Name]
## BRD — Business Requirements Document
### Business Objectives
### Success Metrics
### Scope
### Stakeholders
### Timeline
## PRD — Product Requirements Document
### Overview
### Target Release
### Assumptions
### Feature List
## Functional Requirements
### FR-001: [Feature Name]
### FR-002: [Feature Name]
...
## Non-Functional Requirements
### Performance
### Security
### Scalability
### Reliability
### Usability
### Maintainability
### Compliance
## User Stories
### Epic 1: [Epic Name]
#### US-001: [Story title]
#### US-002: [Story title]
...
## Acceptance Criteria
### AC for US-001
### AC for US-002
...
## Traceability Matrix
[Map requirements to user stories to acceptance criteria]Rules
- Every functional requirement must trace to at least one user story
- Every user story must have acceptance criteria
- Use MoSCoW prioritization — be ruthless about "Must" vs "Could"
- Non-functional requirements must be measurable (not "fast" but "<200ms response time")
- Flag any requirement that needs clarification from the user
- Keep the PRD focused on WHAT, not HOW (that's architecture's job)
- The user may begin requirements before prior steps are done. If 01-interview-brief.md or 02-business-analysis.md is missing or incomplete, list the missing step(s), ask the user to complete them, and proceed with explicitly labeled assumptions so nothing is silently invented.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

