agentleFS
itmbastawiitmbastawi/product-skill-pack/product-manager/SKILL.md

product-manager

Skill7 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create comprehensive product requirements documents including BRD, PRD/SRS, functional requirements, non-functional requirements, user stories, and acceptance criteria. Use as step 3 of the product pipeline, after business analysis is complete. Requires `02-business-analysis.md` as input.

47 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use data-scientist, legal-advisor and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • belokonmSkill

    data-scientist

    Expert in statistical analysis, predictive modeling, machine learning, and data storytelling to drive business insights.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • lotosbinSkill

    legal-advisor

    法务顾问专家,精通法务合规、合同管理、知识产权、劳动法和风险管理

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • lotosbinSkill

    tech-lead

    技术负责人专家,精通技术架构设计、技术选型、代码审查和团队技术管理

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • belokonmSkill

    security-engineer

    Expert in infrastructure security, DevSecOps pipelines, and zero-trust architecture design.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • glinckerSkill

    qa-engineer

    QA specialist agent for test planning, execution, and regression analysis

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    frontend-engineer

    Pro frontend engineering discipline. Enforces build-test-verify workflow for every web project. Never declare done until the site is built, tested, responsive, accessible, and visually verified in a real browser. Use alongside vercel-cli for production-quality deployments.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from belokonm

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 34 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read @output_dir@/01-interview-brief.md and @output_dir@/02-business-analysis.md

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Every functional requirement must trace to at least one user story

    line 122
  3. Distinctive:

    Every user story must have acceptance criteria

    line 123
  4. Distinctive:

    Use MoSCoW prioritization — be ruthless about "Must" vs "Could"

    line 124
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep the PRD focused on WHAT, not HOW (that's architecture's job)

    line 127

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 34 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Product Manager — Step 3 of Product Pipeline

Goal

Translate business understanding into detailed, actionable product requirements.

Input

Read @output_dir@/01-interview-brief.md and @output_dir@/02-business-analysis.md

Output

Save to @output_dir@/03-product-requirements.md

Deliverables

1. BRD — Business Requirements Document

  • Business objectives
  • Success metrics (KPIs)
  • Scope (in-scope and out-of-scope)
  • Stakeholders
  • Timeline overview

2. PRD / SRS — Product/Software Requirements Document

  • Product overview
  • Target release
  • Assumptions and dependencies
  • Feature list with priorities (MoSCoW: Must, Should, Could, Won't)

3. Functional Requirements

For each feature:

  • Feature ID (e.g., FR-001)
  • Description
  • User story reference
  • Priority
  • Dependencies

4. Non-Functional Requirements

  • Performance (response times, throughput)
  • Security (authentication, authorization, data protection)
  • Scalability (concurrent users, data volume)
  • Reliability (uptime, error handling)
  • Usability (accessibility, responsiveness)
  • Maintainability (code standards, documentation)
  • Compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)

5. User Stories

Format: As a [persona], I want [action], so that [benefit] Group by epic. Each story should be:

  • Independent
  • Negotiable
  • Valuable
  • Estimable
  • Small
  • Testable

6. Acceptance Criteria

For each user story, define:

  • Given/When/Then scenarios
  • Edge cases
  • Error scenarios
  • Definition of done

Output Template

# Product Requirements: [Project Name]

## BRD — Business Requirements Document
### Business Objectives
### Success Metrics
### Scope
### Stakeholders
### Timeline

## PRD — Product Requirements Document
### Overview
### Target Release
### Assumptions
### Feature List

## Functional Requirements
### FR-001: [Feature Name]
### FR-002: [Feature Name]
...

## Non-Functional Requirements
### Performance
### Security
### Scalability
### Reliability
### Usability
### Maintainability
### Compliance

## User Stories
### Epic 1: [Epic Name]
#### US-001: [Story title]
#### US-002: [Story title]
...

## Acceptance Criteria
### AC for US-001
### AC for US-002
...

## Traceability Matrix
[Map requirements to user stories to acceptance criteria]

Rules

  • Every functional requirement must trace to at least one user story
  • Every user story must have acceptance criteria
  • Use MoSCoW prioritization — be ruthless about "Must" vs "Could"
  • Non-functional requirements must be measurable (not "fast" but "<200ms response time")
  • Flag any requirement that needs clarification from the user
  • Keep the PRD focused on WHAT, not HOW (that's architecture's job)
  • The user may begin requirements before prior steps are done. If 01-interview-brief.md or 02-business-analysis.md is missing or incomplete, list the missing step(s), ask the user to complete them, and proceed with explicitly labeled assumptions so nothing is silently invented.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.