Storytelling Frameworks
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Storytelling frameworks for business, presentations, interviews, and persuasion. Hero's Journey, STAR, PAS, Pixar Story Spine, Nancy Duarte's Sparkline. Stories are how humans make sense of complexity and remember what matters.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
Every great leader, salesperson, and teacher is a storyteller
- Distinctive: line 90
Add these to make STAR stories memorable:
- Distinctive: line 241
When to use: Korean business presentations, writing for Korean audiences, any situation where the audience expects gradual build-up before …
- Distinctive: line 314
Create a Sparkline presentation structure.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Storytelling Frameworks (스토리텔링 프레임워크)
"The universe is made of stories, not atoms." — Muriel Rukeyser
"Stories are just data with a soul." — Brene Brown
Why Storytelling Matters (왜 스토리텔링인가)
- Facts inform; stories transform (사실은 알리고, 이야기는 변화시킨다)
- People retain 65-70% of information shared through stories vs 5-10% of statistics
- Stories activate the brain's motor cortex, sensory cortex, and frontal cortex — facts activate only Broca's and Wernicke's areas
- Every great leader, salesperson, and teacher is a storyteller
Framework 1: The Hero's Journey (영웅의 여정)
Origin
Joseph Campbell's The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949), refined by Christopher Vogler for Hollywood in The Writer's Journey (1992).
The 12 Stages
ORDINARY WORLD SPECIAL WORLD
| |
1. Ordinary World 7. Approach to Inmost Cave
2. Call to Adventure 8. Ordeal (Supreme Test)
3. Refusal of the Call 9. Reward (Seizing the Sword)
4. Meeting the Mentor 10. The Road Back
5. Crossing the Threshold 11. Resurrection
6. Tests, Allies, Enemies 12. Return with the Elixir| # | Stage | Korean | Business Application |
| 1 | Ordinary World | 일상 세계 | Current state of the customer/company |
| 2 | Call to Adventure | 모험으로의 부름 | The problem or opportunity appears |
| 3 | Refusal of the Call | 부름의 거부 | Hesitation, risk aversion, status quo bias |
| 4 | Meeting the Mentor | 멘토와의 만남 | Your product/service/advisor enters |
| 5 | Crossing the Threshold | 문턱 넘기 | Decision to act, commitment |
| 6 | Tests, Allies, Enemies | 시련, 동맹, 적 | Implementation challenges, partners |
| 7 | Approach to Inmost Cave | 가장 깊은 동굴 접근 | Preparing for the biggest challenge |
| 8 | Ordeal | 시련 (최고의 시험) | The crisis moment, the pivot |
| 9 | Reward | 보상 (칼 쥐기) | First results, validation |
| 10 | The Road Back | 귀환의 길 | Scaling, sustaining the change |
| 11 | Resurrection | 부활 | Final test that proves transformation |
| 12 | Return with Elixir | 영약과 함께 귀환 | New normal, lessons to share |
Business Shortcut: 5-Stage Hero's Journey
For presentations and pitches, condense to 5 stages:
- Status Quo — Here's how things are
- Disruption — Something changes/threatens
- Quest — The journey to solve it
- Transformation — What was learned/built
- New Normal — The better future
Framework 2: STAR Method (STAR 기법)
Origin
Developed for behavioral interview questions. Now used broadly for structured storytelling.
Structure
| Element | Korean | Description | Time |
| Situation | 상황 | Set the context | 10-15% |
| Task | 과제 | What was your responsibility/goal | 10-15% |
| Action | 행동 | What specifically you did (the "I", not "we") | 50-60% |
| Result | 결과 | Quantifiable outcome + what you learned | 20-25% |
STAR+ Enhancement
Add these to make STAR stories memorable:
- Stakes: What would have happened if you failed? (위험)
- Tension: What moment was most uncertain? (긴장)
- Insight: What did you learn that you still use today? (통찰)
Example Structure
S: "In Q3 2024, our largest client threatened to leave after a failed deployment." T: "As the account lead, I had 2 weeks to prevent a $2M annual revenue loss." A: "I flew to their office, conducted root-cause analysis with their engineering team, rebuilt the deployment pipeline myself over a weekend, and created a 30-day stabilization plan." R: "Not only did they stay, but they expanded the contract by 40%. I learned that showing up in person during a crisis builds more trust than any slide deck."
Framework 3: PAS (Problem-Agitate-Solution)
Origin
Classic direct-response copywriting framework. Used in sales, marketing, and persuasive presentations.
Structure
| Element | Korean | Purpose | Emotion |
| Problem | 문제 | Name their pain | Recognition: "Yes, that's me" |
| Agitate | 자극/심화 | Make the pain vivid and urgent | Anxiety: "This is worse than I thought" |
| Solution | 해결 | Present your answer | Relief: "There's a way out" |
Agitation Techniques
The "Agitate" step is what separates mediocre from great persuasion:
- Consequences (결과): "If this continues for 6 more months..."
- Comparison (비교): "Your competitors have already solved this..."
- Hidden costs (숨겨진 비용): "The real cost isn't the tool — it's the 4 hours/week your team wastes on..."
- Emotional cost (감정적 비용): "Every Sunday night, that pit in your stomach..."
- Social proof of pain (고통의 사회적 증거): "73% of teams report this exact frustration..."
PAS vs PASO
Extended version adds Outcome (결과):
- Problem → Agitate → Solution → Outcome
- Outcome = concrete vision of life after the solution
Framework 4: Pixar Story Spine (픽사 스토리 스파인)
Origin
Created by Kenn Adams for improvisational theater. Adopted by Pixar as a story development tool.
The Spine
Once upon a time, there was ___. (옛날에 ___가 있었다)
Every day, ___. (매일 ___했다)
One day, ___. (어느 날 ___가 일어났다)
Because of that, ___. (그 때문에 ___)
Because of that, ___. (그 때문에 ___)
Because of that, ___. (그 때문에 ___)
Until finally, ___. (마침내 ___)
And ever since then, ___. (그 이후로 ___)
The moral is: ___. (교훈은 ___)Business Example
Once upon a time, there was a factory that ran maintenance by gut feeling. Every day, machines broke unexpectedly, costing $50K in downtime. One day, they installed IoT sensors on every critical asset. Because of that, they could predict failures 72 hours ahead. Because of that, maintenance became proactive instead of reactive. Because of that, downtime dropped 80% in 6 months. Until finally, they became the benchmark plant in the company. And ever since then, every new factory starts with predictive maintenance. The moral is: The most expensive maintenance is the kind you didn't plan for.
Why It Works
- "Once upon a time" establishes normalcy — the audience relaxes
- "Every day" creates rhythm and expectations
- "One day" breaks the pattern — attention spikes
- "Because of that" (x3) creates causality — the brain craves cause-and-effect
- "Until finally" delivers resolution — satisfaction
Framework 5: Nancy Duarte's Sparkline (낸시 두아르떼의 스파크라인)
Origin
Nancy Duarte's Resonate (2010). Analyzed hundreds of great speeches (MLK, Steve Jobs) and found a common structure.
The Pattern: What Is vs What Could Be (현재 vs 가능한 미래)
What Could Be ─────╮ ╭────╮ ╭──── NEW BLISS
│ │ │ │
╰────╯ ╰────╯
────────────────────────────────────────
What Is ────────────╮ ╭────╮
│ │ │
╰────╯ ╰────────
← Beginning End →The speaker oscillates between:
- What Is (현재 상태): The current reality, the problem, the pain
- What Could Be (가능한 미래): The vision, the possibility, the promise
Each swing creates contrast and tension. The audience is pulled between dissatisfaction and hope.
Structure
- What Is — Start with the audience's current reality
- What Could Be — Paint the alternative
- What Is — Back to reality (the gap stings more now)
- What Could Be — Expand the vision further
- What Is — Final contrast
- New Bliss — End with the transformed future (the call to action)
Steve Jobs iPhone Launch (2007) — Sparkline
| Beat | What Is / What Could Be |
| 1 (What Is) | "Smartphones are not so smart. Hard to use." |
| 2 (Could Be) | "What if we made a phone that was truly smart?" |
| 3 (What Is) | "Stylus? Who wants a stylus? You lose them." |
| 4 (Could Be) | "We're going to use the best pointing device — your finger." |
| 5 (What Is) | "Current phones have fixed keyboards. Can't innovate." |
| 6 (Could Be) | "Multi-touch display. Every app gets the interface it needs." |
| Final | "iPhone. An iPod, a phone, and an internet communicator. Are you getting it?" |
Key Principles
- Contrast creates energy (대비가 에너지를 만든다) — Without "What Is", "What Could Be" has no weight
- End on "What Could Be" — Always leave the audience in the aspirational state
- The audience is the hero — You are the mentor. The sparkline shows THEIR journey, not yours.
- STAR moment — Every great presentation needs one "Something They'll Always Remember" moment
Framework 6: 기승전결 (起承轉結) — Korean/East Asian Narrative
The traditional Korean 4-act structure:
| Stage | 한자 | Meaning | Function |
| 기(起) | Rise | Introduction | Set the scene, present the topic |
| 승(承) | Continue | Development | Build on the introduction, add details |
| 전(轉) | Turn | Twist/Pivot | Unexpected turn, new perspective, the "but..." |
| 결(結) | Conclude | Resolution | Wrap up, lesson learned, call to action |
When to use: Korean business presentations, writing for Korean audiences, any situation where the audience expects gradual build-up before the point.
Framework 7: 두괄식 (頭括式) — Conclusion-First
Korean business standard: State the conclusion/recommendation FIRST, then support with evidence.
- Opposite of Hero's Journey (which builds to climax)
- Used in: Korean corporate reports, military briefings, executive summaries
- Structure: Bottom Line → Supporting Point 1 → Supporting Point 2 → Restatement
Sub-commands
/story
Analyze a communication need and recommend the best framework.
/story:korean
Apply 기승전결 or 두괄식 to your content. Analyzes whether your audience/context calls for gradual build-up (기승전결) or conclusion-first (두괄식).
Input: Your topic, audience, and context (Korean business? presentation? report?).
Output: Structured narrative using the appropriate Korean framework.
Input: What you need to communicate, to whom, and for what purpose.
Output:
## Storytelling Recommendation
**Best Framework**: [Hero's Journey / STAR / PAS / Story Spine / Sparkline]
**Why**: [rationale]
### Draft Structure
[framework applied to your specific content]
### Key Moments to Emphasize
- ...
### Alternative Framework
[second-best option with brief outline]/story:hero
Apply the Hero's Journey to your content. Full 12-stage or condensed 5-stage.
Input: Your topic, audience, and desired outcome.
Output: Stage-by-stage narrative outline.
/story:star
Build a STAR story for interviews, presentations, or case studies.
Input: The situation or achievement you want to describe.
Output: STAR structure with stakes, tension, and insight.
/story:pitch
Build a pitch using PAS or PASO.
Input: What you're selling/proposing and to whom.
Output: Problem statement, agitation angles, solution framing, and outcome vision.
/story:sparkline
Create a Sparkline presentation structure.
Input: Your topic and call to action.
Output: Alternating What Is / What Could Be beats, with STAR moment recommendation.
Anti-patterns (하지 말아야 할 것들)
- Data Dump Disguised as Story (데이터 덤프를 이야기로 위장) — Adding "Once upon a time" to a spreadsheet doesn't make it a story. Stories need character, conflict, and change.
- The Hero Is Always You (주인공이 항상 나) — In business storytelling, the customer/audience is the hero. You are the mentor/guide.
- No Stakes (위험 없음) — Without risk of failure, there's no tension. No tension, no attention.
- Burying the Lead (핵심을 묻어버리기) — Don't save the payoff for minute 30 of a 30-minute talk. Hook them in 30 seconds.
- Generic Stories (일반적인 이야기) — "A company had a problem and solved it" convinces no one. Specific details create belief.
- Forcing a Framework (프레임워크 강제 적용) — Not every situation needs the full Hero's Journey. A 2-minute update needs STAR, not 12 stages.
- Neglecting Emotion (감정 무시) — Logic makes people think; emotion makes people act. Every story needs an emotional beat.
- Happy Endings Without Struggle (고생 없는 해피엔딩) — Transformation without difficulty is unbelievable. Show the mess.
Framework Selection Guide (프레임워크 선택 가이드)
| Situation | Best Framework | Why |
| Keynote / TED Talk | Sparkline | Builds emotional momentum |
| Job interview | STAR | Structured, evidence-based |
| Sales pitch | PAS or PASO | Urgency + solution |
| Product launch | Hero's Journey (5-stage) | Dramatic arc |
| Team meeting update | Story Spine | Quick, causal, clear |
| Fundraising pitch | Hero's Journey + PAS | Vision + urgency |
| Case study | STAR + Sparkline | Evidence + aspiration |
| Brand narrative | Hero's Journey (12-stage) | Deep mythic resonance |
References
- Joseph Campbell, The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949)
- Christopher Vogler, The Writer's Journey (1992, 3rd ed. 2007)
- Nancy Duarte, Resonate: Present Visual Stories that Transform Audiences (2010)
- Nancy Duarte, slide:ology (2008)
- Kenn Adams, How to Improvise a Full-Length Play: The Art of Spontaneous Theater (1990)
- Robert McKee, Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting (1997)
- See: references/frameworks-detail.md
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- active-listeningSkill
- crucial-conversationsSkill
- descSkill
- Difficult ConversationsSkill
- getting-to-yesSkill
- howtotalkSkill
- influenceSkill
- Motivational InterviewingSkill
- never-splitSkill
- nvcSkill
- Radical CandorSkill
- scarfSkill
- Socratic MethodSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

